BREAKING: TFF Statement – “Convert Military Expenditures To Global Problem-Solving”

Summary
On top of all the global problems we must solve as soon as possible comes the Corona. This statement argues that the priorities of the world are – well, perverse; everything the UN does amounts to 3% of the global military expenditures.
TFF’s Board suggests that all countries reduce their military by 50% immediately. That would save about US$ 1000 billion. And that that huge sum should be re-allocated to solve the problems we had and the socio-economic consequences of the Corona pandemic.
That would also – finally – be a step to prove that governments are willing to implement a policy for true disarmament and move towards human and common security for the common good.
In a civilised world, this should be common sense.

If you do not want to read the whole argument, just scroll down and sign this statement.

“We’ve likely only seen the beginnings of the worldwide economic consequences of the Coronavirus. For those who want to see, there are forecasts of a deep economic crisis written on all the walls.

Before the Corona, the world faced huge problems that – among other resources – require funds to solve: huge sums. Think the 17 UN Development Goals, think technological innovation; think the global climate/warming crisis; think the rebuilding of war-torn countries and think the reduction towards zero and repatriation of the world’s 80 million displaced people.



And think funds to convert the present military systems towards another, less costly way of creating security. We have just experienced how the outdated non-human security has deprived us of the needed resources when the Corona hit. Recklessly, virtually all governments had ignored a predictable civilian challenge but wasted billions of taxpayer money on weapons and war.

The Corona should be a wake-up call.

Crisis means both…

So we ask: Where are the funds going to come from to solve humanity’s most urgent problems before they become too big to solve? 

It seems that most governments believe that the annual world military expenditures – ranging around US$ 2000 billion, the highest ever – can be maintained. Some even believe their national expenditures must increase substantially.

The same governments believe that the world’s most important organisation of which they are all members – the United Nations and its organisations – can do what it must on a regular budget of US$ 3 billion and total annual expenditures of US$ 50-60 billion. That is 3 per cent of the costs of global militarism.

Those are the priorities of our world. It’s not sustainable in Corona times – if it ever were. It is ethically indefensible too. And it produces neither security nor peace.

Perhaps the incomprehensible sum of US$ 2000 billion would be justified if the world experienced solid defence and security as well as trust, cooperation and peace.

But the fact is that there are more tension, hatred, dominance attempts, new kinds of wars added to old ones and much more terrorism than before the US-led Global War on Terror.

Furthermore, one country after the other has been destroyed since the end of the First Cold War in 1989-90. It has been possible thanks to a systematic violation of international law, including in particular the UN Charter.
 

• •

What to do?

Imagine that every country in the world would reduce its military expenditures by at least 50%. Then we would have US$ 1000 billion.

Is it a large or small sum?

It’s equivalent to what China in 2013 put behind the Belt and Road Initiative, BRI – a cooperative effort around infrastructure, fast physical and digital communication, sea and land transport, education and cultural exchange, and much more. Today it involves around 80 countries, some on all continents and it is open to everyone.

The philosophy behind it is, at least theoretically, one of peace. It dates back to the Panchsheel Treaty of 1954, the five principles of peaceful coexistence.

Beyond doubt, this is the largest and most positive cooperation project in today’s world. It is the project that will give birth to – if it has not already? – a new multi-polar world order based more on cooperation than confrontation.

There is, therefore, no doubt that a substantial conversion of, say, US$ 1000 billion from the military to the solution of humanity’s common problems would provide a desperately needed boost for the common good.

(This argument does not rest on any assumption that money is the primary tool to solve problems; that takes lots of non-material qualities. But with economies falling apart at a moment when all economies need funds for” rebooting humanity,” this is a straightforward thing to do with a rather large bang for the buck).

Additionally, lots of human and other resources, knowledge, experience and equipment today operated by the military could be converted and put to civilian tasks.

Such a conversion would boost employment – as there exists no documentation for the often-stated assertion that military investments boost employment more than civilian investments. It is, rather, comparatively wasteful.

It’s time for more global cooperation and less confrontation

Ours is not the time for more militarism, warfare and antagonism. The net effect of military investments is suffering, destruction (of lives, capital and property) and unavoidable environmental destruction.
 
Furthermore, every military dollar stands in the way of precisely  that global cooperation without which we are doomed. And it is not matched by a security or peace effect.

Time is up for those who strut about and try to master others by violence or the threat of it. Militarism and warfare are now as outdated and indefensible as is slavery, absolute monarchy, dictatorship, child labour, rape and discrimination. These are phenomena we have decided, in the name of civilisation, to abolish or condemn.

If you feel we cannot, very quickly, reduce or abolish militarism, nuclearism and warfare but should uphold at least some self-defensive military capacity, that should be discussed. It’s in line with Article 51 of the UN Charter.

That would mean much more dis-armament than the suggested 50% and it would mean trans-armament toward a new way of handling our unavoidable conflicts, create security in diversity and with defensive military and civilian means, and – thereby – realise the peaceful future which 99% of citizens around the world strongly desire.
 
There are, indeed, alternatives. But minds, as well as other resources, need to be liberated before it’s too late.

So, to begin with: Reduce everybody’s military expenditures equally much, say 50%. And see the marvellous positive results – politically, economically and in terms of peace. Then move on.

A better world is possible. And the Corona is a benign wake-up call compared with World War III.

We need to use the Corona crisis constructively.

In this 11th hour, humanity’s situation makes it abundantly clear to us that it is either cooperation and coexistence or destruction and no existence.”


TFF’s Board

Annette Schiffmann
Thore Vestby
Jan Oberg

Christina Spännar, co-founder

Almost 400 TFF Associates and friends of the foundation have already endorsed this statement – see them all further down. They are some of the most peace competent and concerned citizens in the world.

You can trust their judgement, and now it is your turn!

Thanks a lot!

TFF Associates

John Avery
Ina Curic
Gordon Dumoulin
Scilla Elworthy
Richard Falk
Mira Fey
Erni Friholt
Ola Friholt
Johan Galtung
Brajna Greenhalgh
Tim Hayward
Fredrik Heffermehl
Hazel Henderson
Christian Hårleman
Farhang Jahanpour
Jorgen Johansen
Jesper Munk Jakobsen
Peter Jarman
Liu Jian
Claus Kold
David Krieger
Evelin Lindner
David Loy
Mairead Maguire
Dragana Maksimovic
Jelena Mair
Kamran Mofid
Yusra Moshtat
Chantal Mutamuriza
Radmila Nakarada
Jens Jørgen Nielsen
Elaheh Pooyandeh
Neelakanta Radhaskrishnan
Shastri Ramachandaran
Chaiwat Satha-Anand
Soren Sommelius
Hans von Sponeck
David Swanson
Maj Britt Theorin
Biljana Vankovska
Tom Weber
Gunnar Westberg

Friends and supporters of TFF

1-50
Hilal Elver • Susanne Sklar • Diana Johnstone • Dessislava Boneva • Søren Nielsen-Man • Charles Webel • Bente Petersen • Sanford Kelsen • Jan Kjærgaard Hansen • Michael Moutoussis • Siavosh Bigonah • K G Hammar • Povl Madsen • Enver Masud • Ljubodrag “Bob” Djukic • Manuel Herranz Martin • Daniel Ruiz • Göran Palm • Nasila Selasini Rembe • Johanne Margrethe Hartwig • Nicolas J. S. Davies • Jens Rundberg • Ylva Göransson
Peter Warner • Fredrika Gårdfeldt • Ailly Dou • Christopher Black • Andy Carl • Bruce Hawkins • Julie M. Dyer • Theodore N. Iliadis • Peter (Petrus) Jochems • Rolf Czeskleba-Dupont • Stephanie Thiel • Mostafa Eil • Len Bjorkman • Judy Bjorkman • Brita Bastogi • Hanne-Margret Birckenbach-Wellmann • Ulrich Duchrow • Bo Edvinson • Birgitta Edvinson • Thomas Kruse • Jack Gilroy • Deanna Twenge • Göte Rudvall • Marianne Bidstrup • Rosemary Spiota • George Kent • Robert Green.

51-100
Gary E. Doupe • Jovo Bakić • Marian Larsen • Antonio Rosa • Kim Henriksen • Carl Arne Øberg • Domenica Toro Zambrano Simone • Christian Mose-Christensen • Anna Hoas • Hilary J. Jahanpour • Ann Green • Conny Hansson • Majken Jacoby • Jan Strömdahl • John Graversgaard • Barbara Hanst • Gudrun Schyman • Gordon Ward • Phineas A. Washer, Jr. • Torben Konggaard • Svante Karlsson • Mihajlo Buvac • Fatemeh Shadi Afrooz • Hans Genefke Jørgensen • Stefan Vernét • Jacques Öhlund • James H. Mittelman • Jillann W. Richardson-Rohrscheib • Ronald Forthofer • Souad N. Al-Azzawi • Jens-Petter Kjemprud • Ingeborg Breines • Arne Hansen • Holm Hedegaard • Karin Utas Carlsson • H. Peter Langille • David R. Morton • Lena Lövendahl • Stig Broqvist • Orlando Arango • Luís Bravo • Marita Gray • Synnøve Kåset • Reinhard Haverkamp • Sigyn Meder • Julie Jeeg • Øyvind Wistrøm • Synøve Faldalen • Jana Damjanov • Nils Enrum.

101-150
Hanga Hasznos • Bo Alvberger • André Brochu • Jens Thoft • Kjell Næss • Roland von Malmborg • Anders Jacobson • Eva Amborn • Poul Gam • Svetlana Kosenko • Nancy Hammond • Allan Ingster • Maija Savolainen • Linus Höglin • Mikael Gabrielsson • Annika Trägårdh • Karin Wiklund • Nandini Das Halldin • Ingmarie Jacobsen • John Gustavsen • Leila Zand • Gudrun Tibbe Tiberg • Louis Wilms • Udaya R. Tennakoon • Magdalena Liebendörfer-Nilsson • Vladislav Krasnov • Solveig Roth Johansson • Monica Westberg • Saeed Aalaei • Pierre Chataigné • Dominic Turinde • Marie Hedberg • Agnese Pietrobon • Leo Semashko • Solveig Landen • Irene Reintjens • Michèle Naur • George Chakko • Cecilia Björk • Harriet Johansson Otterloo • Linda Roininen • Francesco Castellani • Úrsula Oswald Spring • Olufemi Oluniyi • Sölvi Brädefors • Margit Anderberg • Daphne Wassermann • Gitt Karlsson • Gregor Putensen • Hanne Héli Saler.

151-200
Margaret Flowers • Javid Saraie • Frances Foulkrod • Mitchell L Gold • Andreas Griewank • Örjan Appelqvist • Lai Yin Stenqvist • Cris Morgan • Patrik Fridlund • Gunnel Almberger • Jan Almberger • Betty A. Reardon • Janet Gerson • Wilo Abdille Osman • Göran Dahlman • Andrea Selven • Tibor Varady • Gertrud Eriksson • Jan Svensson • Poul Erik Rasmusen • Mari Larsson • Ingela Stinasdotter • Jan O. Møller • Olof Vennergrund • Ingela Brymér • David Langille • Annika Göthberg • Sven Oscarson • Séverine Renard • Geraldine Gillen • Fin Egenfeldt-Nielsen • Stina Rengman • Anne Sjögren • Li Wångblad • Troels Laier • Fred Eriksson • David Andréas • Lena Maloney • Birte Skovløkke • Erika Waldman • Annika de Mello • Bo Stawreberg • Markus Otterloo • Elin Weber • Rehema Aanyu • Charlotte Thornberg • Emil Forsén • Randi Myhre • Anita Nilsson • Inayat Singal.

201-250
Irene Gillin • Francisco-Javier Campos • Martin Weber • Monica Påhlsson • Gunnar Uppman • Inger Gustavsson • Vérane Loriot • Doris Kruckenberg • Kirsti Kolthoff • Roy Berg • Poka Laenui • Asger Nyrup • Ulf Karlström • Angelica Weber Vernét • Ingeborg Viola Löfgren • Eva B Mannheimer • Gunnar Vagerstam • Britt Hirase • Terence Barry • Adam Greenwell • Noor M. Larik • Tomas Karlsson • Tomas Magnusson • Anita Boström • Jack Ljunggren • Elisabeth Gerle • Gabor Mester • Ninna Urhammer • Håkan Rosén • William J Greenberg • Svend Sorensen • María Cristina Azcona • Steve Amoah • Ayo Ayoola-Amale • Matjaž Mulej Slovenia • Rajko Klajic • Ashokchakravarthy Tholana • Andrei Kozhev • Silvo Devetak • Hannu Virtanen • Tine Jarnum • Elsa Crafoord • Christina J. Gabrielsson • Rabbi David Rosen • Nada Kronja Stanic • Titti Wahlberg • Søren Thuesen • Al Burke • Efraim Laksman • Elisabet B Guðmundsdottir.

251-299
Luigi Viglino • Karin Lundberg • Ann Banks • Karin Nordberg • Ann-Margret Lindborg • Olivia Fuchs • Helena Fernandez • Per Holscher • Jörgen Hassler • Hortense Reintjens • Peter Norrthon • Ida Harsløf • Karolina Kazlauskaite • Christopher Mitchell • Grith Fjeldmose • Verena Falkeström • Ayo Ayoola-Amale • Allan Vokstrup • Sara Soumah • Benjamin Ulbricht • Hasina Parvin • Carla Pagliero • Ruth Noel • Jesper Ammitzbøll • Anker Schjerning • John Hedqvist • Lisbeth Lindell • Geoff Tansey • Inger Raaby • Bjarne Rasmussen • Riitta Heinonen • Rune Klarskov Jensen • Lotte Jakobsen • Marianne Lindström • Jann Fredsö Pedersen • Elfi Sverdrup • Carsten Andersen • Miguel Mendonca • Bozica “Becky” Klajic • Cecilia Dautovic Bergh • Elli von Planta • Anita Christoffersson • Nina Klajic • Charlotte Bhattarai • Takako Kuniyuki • Julie Brink • Stasa Klajic • Pia Sundhage • Katarina Michanek • Annika Göthberg.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

1972-2003 IT and business-related education by IBM in economy, sales, marketing and business development.1971-1972 Military service1968-1971 Gymnasium, mathematics and physics1965-1968 High-school

Related Posts

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...

Recent Articles

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
Read More
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
images-2
Advocates of nuclear disarmament are regularly dismissed by the champions of nuclear deterrence as naïve and unrealistic, utopian or even irresponsible. Yet this ‘doctrine’ of deterrence, regarded by France as the ‘cornerstone’ of its national security, is based on quasi-religious beliefs, a theory that cannot be proven, risky gambles and fragile assumptions. So much so that one might legitimately ask which side the ‘Care Bears’ are on. Marc FinaudVice-President of Initiatives for Nuclear Disarmament (IDN) October 9, 2026 This article was originally published on Pressenza When it comes to these things being treated as religious concepts, look here. Idealists and realists It was Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand’s former Foreign Minister, who repeatedly coined the phrase: ‘Europeans are a sort of Care Bears who don’t realise they’re living in Jurassic Park’. He applies this reference to the cartoon for well-behaved children not only to what he regards as weakness or idealism...
8824b09f-33a5-43f9-9fd0-550f28cda24d_1536x1024
What the West Borrowed from Asia and What It Left Behind Jan Krikke October 8, 2026 The article was originally published here In the late 1960s, the musical Hair announced that the Age of Aquarius was dawning. Its opening anthem promised a transformation of human consciousness: an era of peace, harmony and understanding. Half a century later, a familiar echo of that promise is a meditation app offered by your employer. You can find it in the same list of benefits as the pension plan and the gym discount. How did a spiritual revolution become an employee benefit? The answer lies in the history of the movement known as New Age: where it came from, what it borrowed from Asia, and why the meaning of what it borrowed changed in the process. Two definitions will help. New Age is a loose label for a wide range of spiritual practices and...
Screenshot 2026-10-04 210142
Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....