The United States, Britain and European nations have a history of ‘weaponising’ human rights in foreign policy.
Throughout late imperial history, China has rarely blamed other nations, their religion or race, for domestic problems.
Martin Powers
An opinion piece in South China Morning Post
March 4, 2021
The term “human rights” is properly a feature of the modern world, but people have been calling out cruelty for centuries. Who gets blamed for human tragedy reveals a lot about how a nation values human life.
Western nations, chief among them the United States, have long assumed the promotion of human rights as one of their natural duties, but in recent years some have questioned their qualifications for doing so.
Last Fall in the journal Foreign Affairs James Goldgeier and Bruce W. Jentleson itemised the failures of America’s “tarnished model”, taking note of that “internationally controversial war in Iraq” and a major financial crisis in 2008. Following a period of recovery under President Barack Obama, America then lurched “in a very different direction … by electing a racist reality TV host who blames American allies for the country’s ills”.And that was before White Nationalists attempted to bring down the government by storming the Capitol on January 6.
► Continue reading this excellent analysis at SCMP
If you find our articles enlightening and feel you benefit from them, please let us know that here. Thanks.
Why didn’t the United States pay for the war crimes conducted in Iraq? Is it the case that those in power dictate the rules, are not held accountable, and get to walk away scott-free when they commit genocide, yet try to claim the moral high ground when it comes to calling out other countries for real or perceived war crimes?