Resist and Build Alternatives to the Trump Regime Now: Part 2

PART 2 — Diplomacy, Law and Nonviolent Power

By Jan Oberg
TFF co-founder and director

January 26, 2026

This is the second of four TFF-created idea portfolios designed to curb the global reach of the United States and, in both the short and long term, help catalyse a worldwide nonviolent resistance to what many observers describe as the Trump administration’s uniquely confrontational, destructive and world-threatening policies.

These portfolios outline what governments and citizens across the world can do through dynamic diplomacy, creative initiatives, and strictly nonviolent means.

They are typical TFF works in that we do not only tell what the problem is and how bad it will go – as 90+% of all commentators, experts and scholars do – we tell what we think can be done, inviting you to think of what you think you can do.

It seems painfully clear to me that the current political dynamics in Washington increasingly resemble the most dangerous pattern that ended in 1945 and was supposed to never happen again.

If that assessment holds, then passivity is no longer an option. A coordinated, global, nonviolent mobilisation is essential — not least because nonviolence is the one type of power and language a heavily militarised superpower is least prepared to counter.

All power rests on others accepting and carrying out its orders. Even the strongest leader in the world cannot round up criminals or fight wars with his own hands. Power is always dependent – dependent on someone who finds it legitimate, and do the dirty job on the strongman’s order. If young people were not brainwashed to accept warfare, there would be no wars. This is why nonviolence can be extremely effective and make an overarmed country look morally weak. That’s what Gandhi taught the world when using this theory to rid India not of the British as people but of the British Empire’s dominance structure.

If politicians will not do any of the proposals below – and similar ones – it is a citizens duty to puch them to take concrete step and not just talk.

◆

A. Diplomatic Downgrading & Political Signalling

Diplomatic withdrawal is the fastest, safest way to communicate that the relationship is no longer “business as usual.”

Immediate Measures (within a week)

Recall ambassadors from Washington 
A peaceful but unmistakable alarm bell signalling a breakdown in trust.

Downgrade relations to chargé d’affaires level 
A visible step that reduces political prestige without escalating conflict.

Suspend bilateral strategic dialogues 
Energy, security, and trade talks are paused to signal deep concern.

Coordinated walkouts in NATO, UN, OECD – and No more invitations to world Economic Forum
A symbolic but powerful way to delegitimise unilateral behaviour.

Longer-Term Measures

Lawful Order Contact Group 
A coalition of states committed to international law, excluding the U.S. if necessary.

Block U.S. candidates for leadership roles 
A peaceful way to limit influence in multilateral institutions.

Refuse joint communiqués 
Ensures the U.S. cannot claim consensus where none exists.

Public archive of violations 
A permanent record documenting breaches of international law.

Begin re-orienting the foreign policy everywhere
European and other countries step by step reduce their blind following of the US and open up, big and small, to the rest of the world and to the emerging multipolar world – also to reduce their own crisis, the day the US Empire is finally gone.

B. International Law, Treaties & Normative Pressure

The law is the world’s nonviolent weapon; using it consistently can delegitimise unlawful behaviour.

Immediate Measures (within a week)

Invoke UN Charter mechanisms 
Emergency UNGA sessions under “Uniting for Peace.”

File formal diplomatic protests 
Citing specific treaty violations and Arctic governance norms.

Request an ICJ advisory opinion
Clarifying Greenland’s status under international law.

Elevate Indigenous Greenlandic voices 
Ensuring those most affected speak in UN and Arctic forums.

Refuse to join Trump’s “Peace” Board
Saying no to his bizarre idea of replacing the UN with an institution run by himself and a successor appointed by him. This board has nothing to do with peace and everything to do with Trump.

Raise the option of impeaching Trump worldwide
His violations of international law and legimising domestic state violence justifies such a move.

Longer-Term Measures

New Arctic demilitarization treaty 
A structural safeguard against unilateral military moves and enable peaceful cooperation and sustainable development.

Strengthen UNDRIP-based protections 
Embedding Greenlandic self-determination in international law. (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples = UNDRIP.

National laws against recognizing forced territorial changes anywhere 
A legal firewall against coercive annexation.

Global legal coalition 
A network of states defending small nations against big power arrogance and militarist interventionism.

C. Military & Security Rebalancing (Nonviolent)

Security cooperation is voluntary; suspending it is a peaceful but powerful signal of disapproval.

Immediate Measures (within a week)

Suspend all joint military exercises 
A nonviolent way to say: “We no longer trust your judgment.”

Freeze NATO modernization projects involving U.S. leadership 
A pause that signals strategic recalibration.

Restrict U.S. military overflight permissions 
Territorial access is a privilege, not a right.

Limit U.S. naval port calls 
A peaceful but visible reduction in military cooperation.

Launch national reviews of U.S. base agreements 
A legal and political reassessment of foreign military presence.

Cancel the policy of wasting 5% of GDP on weapons
It was a US demand and there is no reason to adhere to it now. Back to decent threat analysis and dialogue with Russia and others.

Longer-Term Measures

Demand transparency on U.S. nuclear deployments and raise the issue of the U.S. withdrawal from Europe 
A peaceful tool that exposes imbalances of power. Long-range goal: A European Nuclear Weapons Free Zone and common security to Russia, including a mutual Non-Aggression Pact.

Require U.S. forces to pay full environmental and infrastructure costs 
A fairness measure that reduces dependency.

Develop European strategic autonomy 
Building civilian and political capacity to act without U.S. leadership.

Stop military cooperation with the US, first on smaller weapons, and then on the successively larger projects.
European components should not sit in US systems that threaten and bomb around the world. The Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex, MIMAC, must be undermined, slowly but surely.

Build defensive defence, early warning, conflict resolution and common security – a kind of European UN
Time to scrap deterrence, armament and nukes, all American inventions now outdated as NATO is in existential crisis as a non-peacemaking and offensive nuclear-based alliance.

European Arctic Security Framework 
A regional approach independent of great-power rivalry. Common security, coexistence and sustainable development – see forthcoming constructive proposal.

All Nordic countries refuse to host US military bases, personnel and weapons.
Sweden and Finland start an investigation of strategies for leaving NATO and gaining a new neutrality with common Nordic security. Hosting the US makes the hosting nations complicit in US crimes around the world and increases the risk of being dragged into US conflicts instead of creating trues security.

D. Symbolic & Normative Actions

Symbols shape legitimacy; legitimacy shapes power.

Immediate Measures (within a week)

Parliamentary resolutions condemning attempts to alter Greenland’s status and other US steps, including Gaza and Venezuela
A democratic chorus of disapproval.

European Parliament warning on Arctic sovereignty 
A unified political signal from the continent: Don’t touch or we will isolate you even more.

Public diplomacy campaign 
Explaining why Greenland matters to global order in contrast to Trump’s personal grabbing it.

Longer-Term Measures

Rename public spaces after Greenlandic leaders. Change street and square names if American. 
Symbolic act of both solidarity and refusal of support.

Awards for defenders of international law & peace 
Elevating voices that resist coercion. Developing alternatives to the corrupt Nobel “Peace” Prize.

Global narrative coalition 
A long-term effort to frame Arctic stewardship as a globally shared responsibility.

PART 2 SUMMARY

Diplomacy and international law offer powerful nonviolent tools that can be deployed within hours. Immediate actions send shock signals – “we find the Trump Regime’s behaviour offensive and unacceptable.” Long-term measures reshape the political environment and reinforce a lawful, cooperative world order. Nonviolence will prove much more effective than military means for combating the US Empire.

◆

Introduction: How Governments and Citizens Can Stop the Trump Regime’s World-Threatening Designs

Part 1 – Media, Culture and Information Sovereignty

Part 2 – Diplomacy, Law and Nonviolent Power

Part 3 – Economics, trade and financial sovereignty

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...

Recent Articles

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
Read More
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
images-2
Advocates of nuclear disarmament are regularly dismissed by the champions of nuclear deterrence as naïve and unrealistic, utopian or even irresponsible. Yet this ‘doctrine’ of deterrence, regarded by France as the ‘cornerstone’ of its national security, is based on quasi-religious beliefs, a theory that cannot be proven, risky gambles and fragile assumptions. So much so that one might legitimately ask which side the ‘Care Bears’ are on. Marc FinaudVice-President of Initiatives for Nuclear Disarmament (IDN) October 9, 2026 This article was originally published on Pressenza When it comes to these things being treated as religious concepts, look here. Idealists and realists It was Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand’s former Foreign Minister, who repeatedly coined the phrase: ‘Europeans are a sort of Care Bears who don’t realise they’re living in Jurassic Park’. He applies this reference to the cartoon for well-behaved children not only to what he regards as weakness or idealism...
8824b09f-33a5-43f9-9fd0-550f28cda24d_1536x1024
What the West Borrowed from Asia and What It Left Behind Jan Krikke October 8, 2026 The article was originally published here In the late 1960s, the musical Hair announced that the Age of Aquarius was dawning. Its opening anthem promised a transformation of human consciousness: an era of peace, harmony and understanding. Half a century later, a familiar echo of that promise is a meditation app offered by your employer. You can find it in the same list of benefits as the pension plan and the gym discount. How did a spiritual revolution become an employee benefit? The answer lies in the history of the movement known as New Age: where it came from, what it borrowed from Asia, and why the meaning of what it borrowed changed in the process. Two definitions will help. New Age is a loose label for a wide range of spiritual practices and...
Screenshot 2026-10-04 210142
Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....