By Jan Oberg

• Message sent to Facebook in response to its blocking attempt and change of algorithm, both serious restricting my freedom of communication.

 

Blocking personal messages to friends

Yesterday it was my birthday and roughly 500 people sent me thoughts, pictures and good wishes – also for the international peace issues I work for every day.

Today I send a thank-you message to everyone of them (as replies to their messages on my profile, not through Messenger of on their profiles) – with a link to the new platform outside Facebook that we have felt was necessary to build – for the reasons I explain below.

Here is the text of that standard message:

“Thank you so much for remembering me ! 🙂
May I urge you to visit TFF’s new peace portal and magazine:
/ – look around and use Get the News on top right.
We take parts of the debate out of Facebook because it collects too much about us and censors.
And you can use the Donate button on top too 🙂
My best to you!
Jan”

 

After about 120 response messages or so, your system refuses to post my message and threatens me with being blocked from posting if I continue.

In summary, Facebook prevents me from thanking my friends for their kind words on my own profile. And it is not a security issue as you state in your message to me across the page.

I do not appreciate your giving me trouble when I try to thank my Facebook friends.

Your system should be able – given everything else it can do – to distinguish between spam and messages of gratitude exclusively to people who are my friends here.

If you used humans to just check things when you get suspicious – instead of relying blindly on technologies – you would not risk doing such an unkind thing that is also a clear limitation to my freedom to interact with my friends.

Mind you, I am not selling – and never have – any product. I am a peace and future researcher working for a less violent world.

It doesn’t feel good to do so at Facebook which, when doing what you do to me today, indisputably and deliberately violates my freedom of communication.

 

Change of algorithm

While I am at it, permit to raise a larger issue:

I am working with global issues and have thousands of friends and likers plus an organsational page and a public figure page. Sine 2007 I’ve always interacted with people all around the globe.

Some months ago you changed the algorithm in a way that markedly and seriously limits my global reach.

Presumably because I had reported from the war zone in Syria, presented some non-mainstream views and perspectives – and got thousands of new friends who appreciated exactly that.

Over 90% of the feeds I reach now – and the likes, comments and interaction I experience today – are from Sweden and Denmark (I live in Sweden and I am a Danish citizen). Only.

 

My foundation and I have therefore set up a platform outside to enhance the free debate without limitations – some appropriately call it censorship – that you now practise (because, as it seems, of direct pressure by certain countries/governments on Facebook).

What the foundation and I stand for has nothing to do with fake news. It’s known to be truth-seeking during its existence since 1986. A source relied upon by millions every year.

Facebook’s development is very unpleasant to witness, given your enormous power.

Undoubtedly, there are millions who are dismayed by your policies which are political.

Deliberately limiting a researcher with 40 years of experience (as you can see on Facebook) and a research foundation that is committed to the UN Charter goal of making peace by peaceful means – which is a Gandhian principle – is, without a doubt, a political act and political acts are in the service of some interests that you know best yourself and about which I can only guess.

But it does raise the issue of whether we come to a point where Facebook as a politicised media ought to be boycotted.

Now, I would appreciate to a) be informed about algorithm changes in advance so I can shape my foundations’ and my own communication strategy in relation to it – and b) I’d appreciate a personal response to what I write here.

It is certainly possible technically and financially for Facebook to show that much respect for those of us who use Facebook and also pay, from time to time at least, for promotion of our work (now the earlier organic growth options have also, for all practical purposes, been destroyed).

If your system can check my messages to my friends and block me/them, you certainly also have the capacity to answer me personally rather than hiding behind the shield that you are “not able to review individual reports”.

Finally, being a future researcher with a global academic perspective, my prediction is rather straightforward:

Either Facebook will, sooner rather than later, stop this politicisation and moral decay or more and more people will reduce their use of or leave Facebook entirely over years to come, migrate to other platforms and build new free(er) networks.

Your sense of ethics and responsibility for your editorial policies must be made to match the importance you have as the world’s and history’s largest communication network/platform.

 

Sincerely

Jan Oberg, dr.hc., research director
The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, Lund Sweden – tff@transnational.live

January 14, 2018.

PhD, Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer, Professor Emeritus and media commentator

3 Responses

  1. Well spoken Jan. I am disgusted and feel imprisoned by Facebook. I will not hesitate to join a more free social media platform in the near future. I just regret leaving behind so many beautiful persons behind such as you.

  2. The problem is that facebook has now taken an important role in how society works. on my way through the education system in Denmark facebook has taken an increasingly larger role i social life. And since the schools offer no realistic alternative it will stay this way. Facebook has also become a central part of accounts on other websites and services since it is now possible to link all of these accounts to your facebook account. This monopoly should be unacceptable to a nation. It should not rely on a foreign company to sustain it’s citizens. I believe it will be hard to escape. Funnily enough i see that this website also allows Facebook as an option to log in…

  3. Hi Mathis – thanks for your comment. This website – The Transnational – does not like the fact you mention at the end but since it is hosted by WordPress.com and they allow that, there is nothing we can do about it. And that’s now a very common phenomenon all over the Internet. TFF itself would not allow it if we could avoid it.

Related Posts

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
The MSC’s closed groupthink militarism offers only one prescription — more weapons — even as record military expenditures, squeezed from taxpayers in economic crisis, destroy diplomacy and drive escalation to the highest war risks in decades. Jan Oberg TFF director February 13, 2026 From Dialogue Forum to Militarised Ritual For decades, the Munich Security Conference (MSC) – which opened today and runs till Sunday – was one of the few places where adversaries could meet without theatrics. Founded in 1963 as the Wehrkundetagung, it served as a discreet Cold War dialogue forum between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even at moments of high tension, Soviet and later Russian representatives were present, and Munich allowed uncomfortable messages to be delivered directly rather than through press releases or military manoeuvres. That era has vanished. The MSC has become something entirely different: a €13–20 million annual gathering of a closed Western security elite, a polished meeting...

Recent Articles

Photo above: Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd’s Non-Violence outside UN Headquarters in New York. Kirill Levin, CC BY-NC-SA 2. Jan Oberg November 3, 2026 I am happy to be published in Horizons which is produced by the Center for International Relations and Sustainable Development, CIRSD, in Belgrade. My contribution brings out a radical re-thinking of what concepts such as defence, security, deterrence – and peace – may mean if we want to create a more peaceful world. It also summarises a few things I have been working with the last few decades. Please read it here Og her er den på dansk, takket være Johnny Baltzersens lynhurtige oversættelse
UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Photo above: Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd’s Non-Violence outside UN Headquarters in New York. Kirill Levin, CC BY-NC-SA 2. Jan Oberg November 3, 2026 I am happy to be published in Horizons which is produced by the Center for International Relations and Sustainable Development, CIRSD, in Belgrade. My contribution brings out a radical re-thinking of what concepts such as defence, security, deterrence – and peace – may mean if we want to create a more peaceful world. It also summarises a few things I have been working with the last few decades. Please read it here Og her er den på dansk, takket være Johnny Baltzersens lynhurtige oversættelse
UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
Read More
knotted gun
Photo above: Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd’s Non-Violence outside UN Headquarters in New York. Kirill Levin, CC BY-NC-SA 2. Jan Oberg November 3, 2026 I am happy to be published in Horizons which is produced by the Center for International Relations and Sustainable Development, CIRSD, in Belgrade. My contribution brings out a radical re-thinking of what concepts such as defence, security, deterrence – and peace – may mean if we want to create a more peaceful world. It also summarises a few things I have been working with the last few decades. Please read it here Og her er den på dansk, takket være Johnny Baltzersens lynhurtige oversættelse
TFFPortfolioVign
UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
JoGSS-Silent
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
Screenshot 2026-10-26 115647
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Screenshot 2026-10-15 141837
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...