Resist and Build Alternatives to the Trump Regime Now: Part 2

PART 2 — Diplomacy, Law and Nonviolent Power

By Jan Oberg
TFF co-founder and director

January 26, 2026

This is the second of four TFF-created idea portfolios designed to curb the global reach of the United States and, in both the short and long term, help catalyse a worldwide nonviolent resistance to what many observers describe as the Trump administration’s uniquely confrontational, destructive and world-threatening policies.

These portfolios outline what governments and citizens across the world can do through dynamic diplomacy, creative initiatives, and strictly nonviolent means.

They are typical TFF works in that we do not only tell what the problem is and how bad it will go – as 90+% of all commentators, experts and scholars do – we tell what we think can be done, inviting you to think of what you think you can do.

It seems painfully clear to me that the current political dynamics in Washington increasingly resemble the most dangerous pattern that ended in 1945 and was supposed to never happen again.

If that assessment holds, then passivity is no longer an option. A coordinated, global, nonviolent mobilisation is essential — not least because nonviolence is the one type of power and language a heavily militarised superpower is least prepared to counter.

All power rests on others accepting and carrying out its orders. Even the strongest leader in the world cannot round up criminals or fight wars with his own hands. Power is always dependent – dependent on someone who finds it legitimate, and do the dirty job on the strongman’s order. If young people were not brainwashed to accept warfare, there would be no wars. This is why nonviolence can be extremely effective and make an overarmed country look morally weak. That’s what Gandhi taught the world when using this theory to rid India not of the British as people but of the British Empire’s dominance structure.

If politicians will not do any of the proposals below – and similar ones – it is a citizens duty to puch them to take concrete step and not just talk.

◆

A. Diplomatic Downgrading & Political Signalling

Diplomatic withdrawal is the fastest, safest way to communicate that the relationship is no longer “business as usual.”

Immediate Measures (within a week)

Recall ambassadors from Washington 
A peaceful but unmistakable alarm bell signalling a breakdown in trust.

Downgrade relations to chargé d’affaires level 
A visible step that reduces political prestige without escalating conflict.

Suspend bilateral strategic dialogues 
Energy, security, and trade talks are paused to signal deep concern.

Coordinated walkouts in NATO, UN, OECD – and No more invitations to world Economic Forum
A symbolic but powerful way to delegitimise unilateral behaviour.

Longer-Term Measures

Lawful Order Contact Group 
A coalition of states committed to international law, excluding the U.S. if necessary.

Block U.S. candidates for leadership roles 
A peaceful way to limit influence in multilateral institutions.

Refuse joint communiqués 
Ensures the U.S. cannot claim consensus where none exists.

Public archive of violations 
A permanent record documenting breaches of international law.

Begin re-orienting the foreign policy everywhere
European and other countries step by step reduce their blind following of the US and open up, big and small, to the rest of the world and to the emerging multipolar world – also to reduce their own crisis, the day the US Empire is finally gone.

B. International Law, Treaties & Normative Pressure

The law is the world’s nonviolent weapon; using it consistently can delegitimise unlawful behaviour.

Immediate Measures (within a week)

Invoke UN Charter mechanisms 
Emergency UNGA sessions under “Uniting for Peace.”

File formal diplomatic protests 
Citing specific treaty violations and Arctic governance norms.

Request an ICJ advisory opinion
Clarifying Greenland’s status under international law.

Elevate Indigenous Greenlandic voices 
Ensuring those most affected speak in UN and Arctic forums.

Refuse to join Trump’s “Peace” Board
Saying no to his bizarre idea of replacing the UN with an institution run by himself and a successor appointed by him. This board has nothing to do with peace and everything to do with Trump.

Raise the option of impeaching Trump worldwide
His violations of international law and legimising domestic state violence justifies such a move.

Longer-Term Measures

New Arctic demilitarization treaty 
A structural safeguard against unilateral military moves and enable peaceful cooperation and sustainable development.

Strengthen UNDRIP-based protections 
Embedding Greenlandic self-determination in international law. (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples = UNDRIP.

National laws against recognizing forced territorial changes anywhere 
A legal firewall against coercive annexation.

Global legal coalition 
A network of states defending small nations against big power arrogance and militarist interventionism.

C. Military & Security Rebalancing (Nonviolent)

Security cooperation is voluntary; suspending it is a peaceful but powerful signal of disapproval.

Immediate Measures (within a week)

Suspend all joint military exercises 
A nonviolent way to say: “We no longer trust your judgment.”

Freeze NATO modernization projects involving U.S. leadership 
A pause that signals strategic recalibration.

Restrict U.S. military overflight permissions 
Territorial access is a privilege, not a right.

Limit U.S. naval port calls 
A peaceful but visible reduction in military cooperation.

Launch national reviews of U.S. base agreements 
A legal and political reassessment of foreign military presence.

Cancel the policy of wasting 5% of GDP on weapons
It was a US demand and there is no reason to adhere to it now. Back to decent threat analysis and dialogue with Russia and others.

Longer-Term Measures

Demand transparency on U.S. nuclear deployments and raise the issue of the U.S. withdrawal from Europe 
A peaceful tool that exposes imbalances of power. Long-range goal: A European Nuclear Weapons Free Zone and common security to Russia, including a mutual Non-Aggression Pact.

Require U.S. forces to pay full environmental and infrastructure costs 
A fairness measure that reduces dependency.

Develop European strategic autonomy 
Building civilian and political capacity to act without U.S. leadership.

Stop military cooperation with the US, first on smaller weapons, and then on the successively larger projects.
European components should not sit in US systems that threaten and bomb around the world. The Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex, MIMAC, must be undermined, slowly but surely.

Build defensive defence, early warning, conflict resolution and common security – a kind of European UN
Time to scrap deterrence, armament and nukes, all American inventions now outdated as NATO is in existential crisis as a non-peacemaking and offensive nuclear-based alliance.

European Arctic Security Framework 
A regional approach independent of great-power rivalry. Common security, coexistence and sustainable development – see forthcoming constructive proposal.

All Nordic countries refuse to host US military bases, personnel and weapons.
Sweden and Finland start an investigation of strategies for leaving NATO and gaining a new neutrality with common Nordic security. Hosting the US makes the hosting nations complicit in US crimes around the world and increases the risk of being dragged into US conflicts instead of creating trues security.

D. Symbolic & Normative Actions

Symbols shape legitimacy; legitimacy shapes power.

Immediate Measures (within a week)

Parliamentary resolutions condemning attempts to alter Greenland’s status and other US steps, including Gaza and Venezuela
A democratic chorus of disapproval.

European Parliament warning on Arctic sovereignty 
A unified political signal from the continent: Don’t touch or we will isolate you even more.

Public diplomacy campaign 
Explaining why Greenland matters to global order in contrast to Trump’s personal grabbing it.

Longer-Term Measures

Rename public spaces after Greenlandic leaders. Change street and square names if American. 
Symbolic act of both solidarity and refusal of support.

Awards for defenders of international law & peace 
Elevating voices that resist coercion. Developing alternatives to the corrupt Nobel “Peace” Prize.

Global narrative coalition 
A long-term effort to frame Arctic stewardship as a globally shared responsibility.

PART 2 SUMMARY

Diplomacy and international law offer powerful nonviolent tools that can be deployed within hours. Immediate actions send shock signals – “we find the Trump Regime’s behaviour offensive and unacceptable.” Long-term measures reshape the political environment and reinforce a lawful, cooperative world order. Nonviolence will prove much more effective than military means for combating the US Empire.

◆

Introduction: How Governments and Citizens Can Stop the Trump Regime’s World-Threatening Designs

Part 1 – Media, Culture and Information Sovereignty

Part 2 – Diplomacy, Law and Nonviolent Power

Part 3 – Economics, trade and financial sovereignty

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...