Jan Oberg is awarded the North – South Cultural Communication Prize 2004

On January 17, Jan Oberg was awarded the 

North-South Cultural Communication Prize for 2004 by 

Mahdi Elmandjra, President of the Research Fund for the Study of the Future of North-South Cultural Communication in Rabat, Morocco.

Dr. Elmandjra is a famous Moroccan intellectual with a remarkably broad scholarly production covering economics, futures studies, architecture, international relations and human rights. Few have received so many distinguised awards and medals as he has. TFF is very proud that he is also, since 2002, an Associate of the foundation. Elmandjra writes:

“In 1991 I created the North-South Cultural Communication Prize which is given annually on the 17th of January – the date of the American attack on Iraq in 1991. All the details about the Prize and who got it earlier can be found 

here.

Having observed your dedication to the promotion of peace through your personal action as well as the contribution of TFF and its website, I have decided to grant you the Prize for the year 2004. It will be announced on 17 January 2004. With the Prize comes US$ 1.000.”

The Prize is always given to two personalities simultaneously – one from the North and one from the South. This year Khaireddine Haseeb and his Center for the Study of Arab Unity in Lebanon receives the other prize. Magrebarts covers that here.

Says Jan Oberg,

“I am overwhelmed and very very grateful. To be chosen by a distinguished intellectual such as 

Mahdi Elmandjra is enough to feel humble. It makes me even more happy because I am awarded this particular North-South Prize together with an Iraqi scholar.

We at TFF have worked so hard on Iraq, visited the country and produced so many articles, lectures, a photo series and a forthcoming book – all to promote a peaceful solution and raise the level of awareness about the plight people of Iraq – you can see it all at the foundation’s Iraq Forum.

So, receiving this recognition and appreciation from an Arab cultural institution is moving, simply moving. We could ask no better now we are fundraising to continue our work in Iraq. I happily donate the money to TFF. Every dollar helps us get things done and remain an independent and a free voice! It’s also a proof of the tremendous impact of the Internet. Now we know for a fact that there are many out there where it matters most who listen.”

The French Communique About the PrizeLe Prix de la Communication Culturelle Nord-Sud 2004 décerné à Khaireddine HASEEB (Irak) et Jan OBERG (Danemark)Le Prix de la Communication Culturelle Nord-Sud 2004 a été décerné à Khaireddine HASEEB (Irak) et Jan OBERG (Danemark). L’honneur, en cette treizième année du Prix, revient aux études sur la paix, le futur et l’unité trois essentiels objectifs de la communication culturelle. La distinction va à la Scandinavie qui a toujours été un centre névralgique pour les recherches sur la paix et à un chercheur émerite du monde arabe.Khaireddine HASEEB, chercheur et militant de l’unité dirige depuis près de 30 ans le Centre des Etudes sur l’Unité Arabe qu’il a créé à Beirut en 1975. Le Dr. HASEEB est né en 1929 Mossul en Irak. Il a fait ses études supérieures au Royaume Uni à la London School of Economics et à Oxford où il obtint un doctorat en finances publiques. Il a dirigé l’Institution Economique Arabe à Bagdad et prépara l’étude qui servit de base pour la nationalisation du pétrole en Irak. En sa qualité de Directeur général du Centre des Etudes sur l’Unité Arabe il a supervisé la publication de plus de 400 études ainsi que la vente de plus d’un million de livres du Centre qui édite une revue mensuelle « Al Mustaqbal Al Arabi » (l’avenir arabe) depuis mai 1978 sans interruption. Cette revue a déjà été diffusée à plus de 2 millions d’exemplaires.Durant les deux dernières décennies le Centre a été le principal lieu de rencontres et d’échanges de points de vue entre les différents spécialistes arabes et musulmans de toutes tendances confondues. Le Prix va donc, non seulement, à Khaireddine HASEEB l’homme qui combat avec sa foi dans l’unité et sa plume, mais également au Centre, son personnel et ses collaborateurs qui lui ont tous permis de vivre, survivre et produire. Je connais Khaireddine depuis 50 ans lorsqu’on était ensemble à l’Université à Londres. Je salue sa constance, sa rigueur, sa probité intellectuelle et ses grandes qualités humaines. See Centre des Etudes de l’Unité Arabe.Jan OBERG est le Président de la Fondation Transnationale pour les recherches sur la Paix et le Futur (TFF) qui est une institution non-gouvernementale financée entièrement par des donations volontaires. Il est né au Danemark en 1951 et a obtenu un doctorat en sociologie et a été Directeur de l’Institut des Recherches sur la Paix de l’Université Lund en Suède (LUPRI) et ancien Secrétaire général de la Fondation Danoise pour la Paix. Il a enseigné dans des universités européennes et japonaises. Les publications académiques du Dr. OBERG représentent près de 4000 pages et comprennent une dizaine d’ouvrages dont il est auteur ou co-auteur. Il écrit fréquemment dans les journaux scandinaves et régulièrement dans la page culturelle du Helsinborg Dagblad en Suède. Il obtint en 2003 le Prix de la Paix de la municipalité de Castel Nuovo en Italie.La Fondation Transnationale pour les Recherches sur la Paix et le Futur (TFF) que dirige Jan OBERG a consacré beaucoup d’efforts aux conflits dans les Balkans et le Moyen-Orient et a su utiliser les facilités de l’Internet d’une manière très efficace pour le re-équilibrage de l’information et la promotion de la paix. Il suffit de consulter son site pour s’en convaincre. C’est pour cela que cet octroi est destiné aussi bien à Jan OBERG qu’à la TFF et tous ceux qui collaborent avec ce réseau consacré à la construction de la paix pour un meilleur futur.LE PRIX DE LA COMMUNICATION CULTURELLE NORD-SUDCe Prix a été créé en 1991 par le Professeur Mahdi ELMANDJRA à la suite de la publication de son livre «Première Guerre Civilisationnelle». Il est attribué annuellement le 17 janvier, date anniversaire de la guerre meurtrière qui fut déclenchée, en 1991, contre le peuple irakien et qui se prolonge encore à ce jour avec une considérable perte de vies innocentes.Ce Prix est financé par les droits d’auteur des écrits de son initiateur. Il a été octroyé, pour la première fois en 1992, à Ahmed SANOUSSI (Maroc), satiriste et à Larbi SEBBAN (Maroc), caricaturiste des journaux «Al Alam» et «Al Quds». Les lauréats de 1993 furent Ramsey CLARK, ancien ministre de la Justice (Etats-Unis) et Mounir BASHIR (Iraq). Il a été décerné en 1994 à deux hommes de théâtre, Ibrahim SPAHIC (Bosnie) et Taib SEDDIKI (Maroc). Il fut remis, en 1995, au Professeur Yuzo ITAGAKI de l’Université de Tokyo (Japon), en 1996 aux Professeurs François BURGAT (France) et Ahmed LAKHDAR-GHAZAL (Maroc). Il fut attribué en 1997 à l’Association internationale FUTURIBLES (France) et à l’Agence de Presse et d’édition Chiraa Tanger (Maroc). En 1998, il a été remis à Ahmed BEN YESSEF un des maîtres peintres des écoles de Tétouan et Séville et El Mostafa REZRAZI, le premier marocain à obtenir un doctorat d’une université japonaise.Le Prix fut attribué en 1999 à l’enfance Irakienne collectivement, d’une part, et à un homme de cœur, de probité et de grand courage : Denis HALLIDAY (Irlande) qui démissionna de son poste de Coordinateur de l’Action Humanitaire des Nations Unies le 31 octobre 1998 en signe de protestation contre les effets néfastes de l’embargo imposé à l’Irak et dont plus de 500.000 enfants furent victimes. Les lauréats de l’an 2000 furent Kiichi FUJIWARA (Japon) Professeur de Relations Internationales (International Politics) à l’Université de Tokyo et à Amal BOUJEMAA qui fut la première fille née à la Maternité du Souissi à Rabat en l’an 2000. Les lauréats de 2001 étaient : le martyr Mohamed Jamal AL-DURREH (Palestine) et tous les enfants de l’INTIFADA et Talal ABU RAHMA, reporter de France 2. Le Prix pour l’année 2002 a été attribué au Professeur Riccardo PETRELLA (Italie) Conseiller auprès de la Commission Economique Européenne et enseignant à l’Université Catholique de Louvain ainsi qu’au Dr. Said ZULFICAR (Egypte) ancien fonctionnaire international de l’UNESCO, ancien Secrétaire général du Prix d’Architecture de l’Aga Khan et actuellement Secrétaire général de « Patrimoine Sans Frontières ». En 2003 le Prix fut attribué à Ignacio RAMONET (France) Rédacteur en Chef du « Monde Diplomatique » et Abdel Barri ATWAN (Palestine) Rédacteur en Chef du journal AL QUDS publié à Londres. Mahdi ElmandjraRabat, le 17 janvier 2004

Selected international news coverage of the 2004 Prize

Al-Quds Al-Arabi

Maghreb Arabe Presse

TunisNews

Le Matin

Other coverage

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...