The Appeal of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates

Peace!

If the Third Millennium could begin under the sign of non-violence… It’s the dream of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates. They invite you to join them to influnece all governments of the planet.

The Appeal of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD”To Heads of States of all member states
of the General Assembly of the
United Nations.



Today, in every country throughout the world, there are many children silently suffering the effects and consequences of violence.

This violence takes many different forms: between children on the streets, at school, in family life and in the community. There is physical violence, psychological violence, socio-economic violence, environmental violence and political violence. Many children – too many children – live in a “culture of violence”.

We wish to contribute to reduce their suffering. We believe that each child can discover, by himself, that violence is not inevitable. We can offer hope, not only to the children of the world, but to all of humanity, by beginning to create, and build, a new Culture of Non-Violence.

For this reason, we address this solemn appeal to all Heads of States, of all member countries of the General Assembly of the United Nations, for the UN General Assembly to declare:

That the first decade of the new millennium, the years 2000-2010, be declared the “Decade for a Culture of Non-Violence”;

That at the start of the decade the year 2000 be declared the “Year of Education for Non-Violence”;

That non-violence be taught at every level in our societies during this decade, to make the children of the world aware of the real, practical meaning and benefits of non-violence in their daily lives, in order to reduce the violence, and consequent suffering, perpetrated against them and humanity in general.

Together, we can build a new culture of non-violence for humankind which will give hope to all humanity, and in particular, to the children of our world.With deepest respect,

The Nobel Peace Prize LaureatesSigned by

Mairead Maguire Corrigan,
Nelson Mandela,
Mother Teresa,
Aung San Suu Kyi,
The 14th Dalaï Lama (Tenzin Gyatso),
Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev,
Shimon Péres,
Elie Wiesel,
Mgr. Desmond Mpilo Tutu,
Adolfo Pérez Esquivel,
Yasser Arafat,
Mgr Carlos Felipe Ximenes Belo,
José Ramos-Horta,
Norman Borlaug,
Oscar Arias Sanchez,
UNICEF,
Frederik Willem de Klerk,
Betty Williams,
Lech Walesa,
Joseph Rotblat.

Why was this Appeal made ?
The conflicts of the second half of this 20th century with the devastating power of their atomic and chemical weapons have shown that the human species and its environment are under threat of extinction. Violence, under so many forms, has invaded human society.

It is therefore urgent to do everything in our power, with determination and tenacity, to reverse the processes which have made our 20th century the scene of the greatest carnage in history.

We will transmit to the children of the third millenium the wonders of our technology, with its promises of progress in all of Life’s spheres.But our legacy is also our sick planet, global economic war in our global economic village, a human family – broken and confused – worshipping before the altar of the Free Market.

If we are to escape from the ever-increasing threat of famines, war, poverty, exclusion and ecological catastrophees, then our children must acquire the wisdom that we lack.

This aim of Appeal is not senseless dramatisation. The aim of the Appeal is to bring people together to reflect, in the simplest of terms, on the future we want to build for ourselves and our children. Never in human history has mankind disposed so much power to transform himself and his world, the possibilities for creating a better life and a healthier environment – or – of destroying it all.

Life is permanent transformation by organic processes.

If we, as human beings, do not – at long last – sincerely opt for Peace, and give ourselves the means to achieve Peace through non-violence, then we will have opted for extinction. But Peace is not an inborn reflex. It is something to be accquired, learnt, merited.

We believe that it is our duty to participate in the eclosion of a peace generation. Our duty also to invite our children, and – through them – future generations, to avoid our own errors, and break free from the suicidal culture of violence that we live in. It is our duty to help them become aware of the possible alternatives, so that they may live in self-respect, at peace with their consciences, at peace with their world.

How the Appeal started
The first person to express the idea that non-violence should be taught to children at school was Thich Nhat Hanh (1).

Mme Marie-Pierre Bovy, president of IFOR (2) and member of a community founded by Lanza de Vasto, suggested during a community meeting in 1996 that there should be a “Year of Non-Violence.” Mr Pierre Marchand, founder of the humanitarian organisation “Partage avec les Enfants du Monde” 24 years ago, and IFOR delegate to the UNESCO in the Culture for Peace programme, decided to take up that challenge by launching a world-wide campaign.

Pierre Marchand met with the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Mairead Corrigan-Maguire, in Belfast and she agreed to lead the campaign. A generous donor, who has asked to remain anonymous, met the cost of these initiatives. Sri Loganathan, one of the leaders of the Gandhian movement and friend of Vinoba Bhavé, proposed that children should be taught about non-violence in kindergarten. The text of the appeal was written in a Children’s Village in India by Pierre Marchand.

From there, Pierre Marchand went on to Calcutta where Mother Teresa, recovering from her latest operation, signed the appeal in her hospital bed.

The third Nobel Peace Prize laureate to sign was Aung San Suu Kyi during a long discussion with Pierre Marchand in her Rangoon home – under the close surveillance.

Mairead Corrigan-Maguire and Pierre Marchand were then received in Washington by many dignataries, including the Dalai Lama, and by Mrs Sorensen – at the UN headquarters.

Mr Federico Mayor – Director General of UNESCO, Mrs Carol Belamy – Director General of UNICEF and Mrs Hildegard Goss-Mayr – Chairwoman of IFOR, have since signed letters in support of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate’s Appeal.

In a word – the consensus was there from the start. Today all the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates have signed the Appeal, (with the exception of two who we were unable to contact.)

At the end of May 1997, a letter was sent to all Heads of States to inform them of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate’s Appeal and their Proposed Resolution (text included below).

The General Assembly of the United Nations should be able to examine this text during the next session in October 1997.If, as we hope, this resolution is adopted we will have made but the first step. Then the real work will begin: to transform the best intentions of the world’s governments into concrete measures.As we stated earlier, education is the key factor. Education nourishes Culture. It is an interactive process which starts at the earliest instants of life.We already know that we can count on the support of several hundred organisations throughout the world to help us start programmes adapted to the culture and living conditions of children, young people and adults.

Among these organisations ready to help are the Serpaj in Latin America, The Peace People in Ireland, the Mouvement Social in Lebanon, Compartir in Lebanon, ASSEFA in India, The House of Grace in Israël, Milijuli in Nepal and most of all – IFOR.

Founded in 1915, IFOR was the first organisation for education in Non-Violence. IFOR has branches in over forty countries and brings together thousands of men and women committed to Non-Violence. IFOR’s role will be to co-ordinate the neccesary measures with governmental and non-governmental organisations, teachers, artists .. throughout the World.

1.UNESCO and UNICEF have agreed to integrate the spirit and the objectives of this Appeal into their programmes.Ex-president of the World Conference of Religion for Peace, Doyen of Van Anh University, author of seventy five books, Thich Nhat Hanh was proposed by Martin Luther King for the Nobel Peace Prize.

2.IFOR: The International Fellowship of Reconciliation, (Movement international de la réconciliation), has consultative status at the UN.

PROPOSED RESOLUTION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS

In response to the “Appeal for the Children of the World”, addressed by Nobel Peace Prize Laureates to each Head of the Member-States of the United Nations from Bethlehem in May 1997;

Recognising the reality of the different forms of violence which inflict today suffering on countless numbers of children, and conscious of the fact that this violence can be transformed to free ourselves, in order to live and to behave without being the cause of suffering, with a deep respect for Life, for the duties, the rights and the dignity of every human being and – specifically – of each child;

Aware of the rich spiritual heritage of humanity, manifest in our different religious traditions, handed down from generation to generation since the dawn of consciousness in the human species, and

Aware of the need to live our lives according to this heritage, to live mindfully and to transmit this heritage carefully to future generations, for it is the basis of a non-violent and meaningful art of living all together;

Recalling that the aim of the United Nations is to promote harmony and reconciliation between all members of the human family, and with our environment;

Recalling that the mission of UNESCO is to promote Peace through Education, Science and Culture, particularly through the “Culture of Peace” programme;

Considering the spirit of the International Convention on the Rights of the Child, signed and ratified by almost all of the United Nations member states;

Considering the Heads of State’s Summit and Action Plan for Children, convened in 1990 by UNICEF;

Recalling the Report of Mrs Graça Machel, in 1996, about the horrifying and unacceptable impact of armed conflict on children;

Recalling the constructive work done, since 1919, by all the members of the “International Fellowship of Reconciliation”, particularly with the Mahatma Gandhi and the Reverent Martin Luther King, to promote non-violence as a new way of living mindfully;

The Assembly General of the United Nations :

* Declares the decade 2000 – 2010 “The decade for a Culture of Non-Violence” ;

* Declares the year 2000 “The Year of Education for Non-Violence” ;

* Invites each member state to take the necessary steps so that Non-Violence be taught at every level in our societies during this decade, so that children become aware of the real, practical meaning and benefits of Non-Violence in their daily lives, in order to reduce the violence – and consequent suffering, perpetrated against them and humanity in general.

* Invites the president of the International Foundation “Appeal of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates : Share with the Children of the World” to deliver a report to the United Nations Secretary General on January 1st 2000, containing propositions for achieving these aims of mindful art of living, with the active support of the member states, the different organs of the United Nations and relevant N.G.O.s. as the “International Fellowship of Reconciliation”, the “Peace People” and “Servicio Paz y Justicia”.

This resolution involves no specific U.N.O. budget for it’s application. The International Foundation “Appeal of the Nobel Peace Prize Laureates: Share with the Children of the World” calls upon individuals and collectivities (Nations, U.N. agencies, organisations, state enterprise and private companies, etc.) to share their resources, freely and willingly in order to build, all together with women and men of good will, without any discrimination of any kind and nobody left behind – specifically with all our children – a new way of life for all : A Culture of Non-Violence.

Letter of Support for the Appeal of The Nobel Peace Prize Laureates

I support the Appeal of The Nobel Peace Prize Laureates, so that The Year 2000 be named “The Year for the Education of Non-Violence”

The Years 2000 to 2010 be named “A Decade for The Culture of Non-Violence” so that education in Non-Violence may be taught and made available to all.

Title, Name and Firstname ____________________________________________

Full Address _______________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

Post /Zip Code _______________Country _______________________________

Profession______________________________________________ Age_______

Signature_________________________________________

By fax +33 3 44 86 39 07 or e-mail partage@wanadoo.fr

N.B. Please ask your friends and relatives to sign also; children can sign too.You can photocopy this page or copy it by hand on a sheet of paper.Please write clearly in capital letters your name and address so we can authenticate your signature.

This movement was started by committed individuals who prefer to keep it independent of any state intervention. This independence requires financial autonomy that in turn depends on private donations.

Any donations should be addressed to:

The Appeal of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates:
Sharing with the Children of the World
BP 20797
60207 Compiegne Cedex 2, France.
Fax + 33 (0)3 44.86.39.07
Internet: perso.wanadoo.fr/partage

Using either:

Our Post Office Bank Account (“CCP”) N° 42.207.77.S at La Source, France,

– or –

A Bank to Bank Transfer to our account in our local bank via l’Union des Banques in Paris, France. (UBP-France) using SWIFT DIRECT.
The Swift Code is: LUBPFRPP. Our local bank is the “Banque de Picardie – Compiègne – France”. Their ID number is : 30938 and our account with them is :0010-000130450.0042.

We thank you sincerely for your support !

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...