Denmark’s UN ambassador’s disgraceful speech about Israel’s attack: It didn’t happen!

Jan Oberg

June 19, 2025

Does she think we are idiots? Does Denmark’s foreign policy establishment? I am a Danish citizen, and this fraudulent speech with a gross lie through omission is morally and politically unacceptable.

H. E. Ambassador, Christina Markus Lassen, spoke at the UN Security Council’s urgent meeting caused by Israel’s attack on Iran. Read her short – shocking – speech here.

She is an experienced Danish diplomat, partly educated in the US (of course), and has been her country’s ambassador to Syria, where she collaborated with the US (the famous Mr Ford!), France, and the UK to shape a “Western approach” – to changing the government of Bashar al-Assad, one must assume.

Perversely as hard to believe, she does not mention that Israel has attacked Iran!

No, she starts with the US/Israeli mantra – they are both major nuclear powers, of course – that Iran shall never be allowed to have nuclear weapons: “Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon. For years, Iran has continued to undertake activities in blatant violation of the JCPOA.”

Here she conveniently tells a lie; first, there is no international law-based decision anywhere that Iran shall never be allowed to acquire these weapons. It’s a US and Israeli determination, nothing else. She must, therefore, omit that Israel has between 50 and 400 nukes, depending on sources and estimates, and that the UN, where she speaks, has decided decades ago that the Middle East shall be a zone free of weapons of mass destruction. More about the basic facts here.

By omission, she lies again with the reference to the JCPOA. That extremely important agreement of 2015 – a brilliant piece of diplomacy – was abrogated unilaterally by Donald Trump in 2018. He called it “horrible” and we now see what a great alternative he has up his sleeve.

Furhtermore, there exists no report that Iran broke any provisions, even though the JCPOA was not binding with a major participant having left it. On the contrary, three months ago, Trump’s national security director, Tulsi Gabbard, stated that there were no signs that Iran was aiming at getting nuclear weapons.

This ambassador of omission and misinformation continues with another blatant lie about Iran – that “these activities constitute a threat to international peace and security and a threat to the global non-proliferation regime.” Had she had the decency to even mention Israel in her speech, she would have added that Israel felt threatened and that its attack was an act of self-defence, or ‘pre-emptive.’. Have no doubt!

Anyhow, Iran – which has never attacked or occupied another state (no matter what you may think of its theocratic policies) and has no nuclear weapons (but could have acquired them 2-3 decades ago if it wanted constitutes a threat to international security and peace! In contrast, Israel, which is a nuclear state, has repeatedly attacked Iran and other countries and conducted the worst genocide since 1945 does not constitute such a threat!

The rest of her speech is blah-blah, devoid of intellectualism – the work of security and peace illiterates. Kakistocrats. I mean, when you can only urge “all parties” to show restraint and de-escalate but can’t mention the aggressor, your political capacity resembles a snowball in hell.

These distortions and turning reality upside-down are, of course, made in order to please the two exceptionalist states with lots of historical blood on their hands that I call “USrael” – at the moment the two most dangerous states and leadership on earth.

H. E. the Ambassador knows what role to play at the stage of Western reckless interventionism, militarism and criminal warfare. No respect for reality. No respect for fairness. And to hell with ethics.

She says that “Denmark’s position is clear.” Which Denmark? Would all Danish citizens feel OK with this series of fake and omissions, with the Danish UN mission’s war-mongering statements in this crystal clear case of aggression in total violation of everything the UN and international stands for – letter as well as spirit? ‘

No, so mean and so primitive are not all Danes. I for one say: Not in my name. I don’t want the terrible war Mme Christina Markus Lassen recklessly promotes in this particular speech.

It is time that we citizens are given an opportunity to elect not only national “representatives” for a parliament but also those who “represent” – or are supposed to represent us – in international forums.

Furthermore, perhaps it was a good idea that the media – if they have any independent thinking left – began to monitor what is stated in the name of Denmark and the Danish people’s name abroad. Particularly if Denmark’s diplomats at the finest organisation we have, the UN, do nothing but defile both the UN’s Charter and Denmark’s name in an attempt to promote a USraeli war that may threaten to set the whole Middle East on fire.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

5 Responses

  1. How on earth are we able to deal with such a poverty of ideas when it comes to the stark realities of the military industrial complex? Most ordinary people have much more sense than any serving politician these days. They seem to be leading us into very dangerous territory.

  2. With its genocidal war against the Palestinians, Israel has not only committed one of the worst crimes of the past century, it has also forced its allies to violate and to undermine the United Nations, international law, and the UN Human Rights Charter which formed the basis of a new world order after the scourge of two devastating world wars. In their blind zeal to support Israel’s apartheid regime, Western governments have also allowed that monstrous regime to dismantle the UN-based international order. Israel has killed at least 60,000 defenceless Palestinians, mainly women and children, and has wounded and maimed tens of thousands more. It has barred UNRWA and other humanitarian organisations to feed the Palestinians and, instead, has set up a few militarised food distribution centres with the help of US mercenaries. However, instead of providing food to two million starving Palestinians, it has turned those few food distribution centres into abattoirs, killing dozens of desperate, hungry people every day. It has killed more than 400 Palestinians since setting up those killing zones. On top of all that, the criminal Israeli regime has launched an unprovoked, so-called pre-emptive attack on Iranian nuclear installations which is a blatant violation of international and NPT laws. Israel has also attacked dozens of residential areas, power and water installations, military sites, even hospitals and Iran’s main radio and television centre, killing hundreds of people. Instead of strongly condemning these heinous acts, nearly all Western countries have supported Israel in the name of its “right to defend itself”. These are the worst violations of international law since the Second World War. The West is paying a very high price in support of an aggressive, genocidal and apartheid regime. It has proved that it did not really believe in any of the principles of international law, except for propaganda purposes. They are pushing the world towards a very dark future.

  3. Well said Jo. Thanks for the article. We have to hope that all citizens currently victims of their own Kakistocracy are not judged by such lying morons. Regards, Susan.

  4. Thank you so much, dear Farhang. I am so very sorry also for what is happening now, June 22, to your country. Shame on “USrael.”

  5. Citizens elected such lying morons and then allowed them to run loose, calling ourselves victims for our failure to care or act. And the excuses, like ‘no time,’ ‘too depressing’ when it’s about life and law. And having set the stage, we’ll be shocked shocked shocked when Americans are murdered in retaliation? Or Iran will devise something appropriate. See Richard Medhurst’s tit-for-tat-timeline, any ethical moral idiot could have tracked it for themself. If they cared to. https://youtu.be/5dO4LWQVmeE?feature=shared

Related Posts

It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...