Denmark’s UN ambassador’s disgraceful speech about Israel’s attack: It didn’t happen!

Jan Oberg

June 19, 2025

Does she think we are idiots? Does Denmark’s foreign policy establishment? I am a Danish citizen, and this fraudulent speech with a gross lie through omission is morally and politically unacceptable.

H. E. Ambassador, Christina Markus Lassen, spoke at the UN Security Council’s urgent meeting caused by Israel’s attack on Iran. Read her short – shocking – speech here.

She is an experienced Danish diplomat, partly educated in the US (of course), and has been her country’s ambassador to Syria, where she collaborated with the US (the famous Mr Ford!), France, and the UK to shape a “Western approach” – to changing the government of Bashar al-Assad, one must assume.

Perversely as hard to believe, she does not mention that Israel has attacked Iran!

No, she starts with the US/Israeli mantra – they are both major nuclear powers, of course – that Iran shall never be allowed to have nuclear weapons: “Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon. For years, Iran has continued to undertake activities in blatant violation of the JCPOA.”

Here she conveniently tells a lie; first, there is no international law-based decision anywhere that Iran shall never be allowed to acquire these weapons. It’s a US and Israeli determination, nothing else. She must, therefore, omit that Israel has between 50 and 400 nukes, depending on sources and estimates, and that the UN, where she speaks, has decided decades ago that the Middle East shall be a zone free of weapons of mass destruction. More about the basic facts here.

By omission, she lies again with the reference to the JCPOA. That extremely important agreement of 2015 – a brilliant piece of diplomacy – was abrogated unilaterally by Donald Trump in 2018. He called it “horrible” and we now see what a great alternative he has up his sleeve.

Furhtermore, there exists no report that Iran broke any provisions, even though the JCPOA was not binding with a major participant having left it. On the contrary, three months ago, Trump’s national security director, Tulsi Gabbard, stated that there were no signs that Iran was aiming at getting nuclear weapons.

This ambassador of omission and misinformation continues with another blatant lie about Iran – that “these activities constitute a threat to international peace and security and a threat to the global non-proliferation regime.” Had she had the decency to even mention Israel in her speech, she would have added that Israel felt threatened and that its attack was an act of self-defence, or ‘pre-emptive.’. Have no doubt!

Anyhow, Iran – which has never attacked or occupied another state (no matter what you may think of its theocratic policies) and has no nuclear weapons (but could have acquired them 2-3 decades ago if it wanted constitutes a threat to international security and peace! In contrast, Israel, which is a nuclear state, has repeatedly attacked Iran and other countries and conducted the worst genocide since 1945 does not constitute such a threat!

The rest of her speech is blah-blah, devoid of intellectualism – the work of security and peace illiterates. Kakistocrats. I mean, when you can only urge “all parties” to show restraint and de-escalate but can’t mention the aggressor, your political capacity resembles a snowball in hell.

These distortions and turning reality upside-down are, of course, made in order to please the two exceptionalist states with lots of historical blood on their hands that I call “USrael” – at the moment the two most dangerous states and leadership on earth.

H. E. the Ambassador knows what role to play at the stage of Western reckless interventionism, militarism and criminal warfare. No respect for reality. No respect for fairness. And to hell with ethics.

She says that “Denmark’s position is clear.” Which Denmark? Would all Danish citizens feel OK with this series of fake and omissions, with the Danish UN mission’s war-mongering statements in this crystal clear case of aggression in total violation of everything the UN and international stands for – letter as well as spirit? ‘

No, so mean and so primitive are not all Danes. I for one say: Not in my name. I don’t want the terrible war Mme Christina Markus Lassen recklessly promotes in this particular speech.

It is time that we citizens are given an opportunity to elect not only national “representatives” for a parliament but also those who “represent” – or are supposed to represent us – in international forums.

Furthermore, perhaps it was a good idea that the media – if they have any independent thinking left – began to monitor what is stated in the name of Denmark and the Danish people’s name abroad. Particularly if Denmark’s diplomats at the finest organisation we have, the UN, do nothing but defile both the UN’s Charter and Denmark’s name in an attempt to promote a USraeli war that may threaten to set the whole Middle East on fire.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

5 Responses

  1. How on earth are we able to deal with such a poverty of ideas when it comes to the stark realities of the military industrial complex? Most ordinary people have much more sense than any serving politician these days. They seem to be leading us into very dangerous territory.

  2. With its genocidal war against the Palestinians, Israel has not only committed one of the worst crimes of the past century, it has also forced its allies to violate and to undermine the United Nations, international law, and the UN Human Rights Charter which formed the basis of a new world order after the scourge of two devastating world wars. In their blind zeal to support Israel’s apartheid regime, Western governments have also allowed that monstrous regime to dismantle the UN-based international order. Israel has killed at least 60,000 defenceless Palestinians, mainly women and children, and has wounded and maimed tens of thousands more. It has barred UNRWA and other humanitarian organisations to feed the Palestinians and, instead, has set up a few militarised food distribution centres with the help of US mercenaries. However, instead of providing food to two million starving Palestinians, it has turned those few food distribution centres into abattoirs, killing dozens of desperate, hungry people every day. It has killed more than 400 Palestinians since setting up those killing zones. On top of all that, the criminal Israeli regime has launched an unprovoked, so-called pre-emptive attack on Iranian nuclear installations which is a blatant violation of international and NPT laws. Israel has also attacked dozens of residential areas, power and water installations, military sites, even hospitals and Iran’s main radio and television centre, killing hundreds of people. Instead of strongly condemning these heinous acts, nearly all Western countries have supported Israel in the name of its “right to defend itself”. These are the worst violations of international law since the Second World War. The West is paying a very high price in support of an aggressive, genocidal and apartheid regime. It has proved that it did not really believe in any of the principles of international law, except for propaganda purposes. They are pushing the world towards a very dark future.

  3. Well said Jo. Thanks for the article. We have to hope that all citizens currently victims of their own Kakistocracy are not judged by such lying morons. Regards, Susan.

  4. Thank you so much, dear Farhang. I am so very sorry also for what is happening now, June 22, to your country. Shame on “USrael.”

  5. Citizens elected such lying morons and then allowed them to run loose, calling ourselves victims for our failure to care or act. And the excuses, like ‘no time,’ ‘too depressing’ when it’s about life and law. And having set the stage, we’ll be shocked shocked shocked when Americans are murdered in retaliation? Or Iran will devise something appropriate. See Richard Medhurst’s tit-for-tat-timeline, any ethical moral idiot could have tracked it for themself. If they cared to. https://youtu.be/5dO4LWQVmeE?feature=shared

Related Posts

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...

Recent Articles

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
Read More
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
images-2
Advocates of nuclear disarmament are regularly dismissed by the champions of nuclear deterrence as naïve and unrealistic, utopian or even irresponsible. Yet this ‘doctrine’ of deterrence, regarded by France as the ‘cornerstone’ of its national security, is based on quasi-religious beliefs, a theory that cannot be proven, risky gambles and fragile assumptions. So much so that one might legitimately ask which side the ‘Care Bears’ are on. Marc FinaudVice-President of Initiatives for Nuclear Disarmament (IDN) October 9, 2026 This article was originally published on Pressenza When it comes to these things being treated as religious concepts, look here. Idealists and realists It was Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand’s former Foreign Minister, who repeatedly coined the phrase: ‘Europeans are a sort of Care Bears who don’t realise they’re living in Jurassic Park’. He applies this reference to the cartoon for well-behaved children not only to what he regards as weakness or idealism...
8824b09f-33a5-43f9-9fd0-550f28cda24d_1536x1024
What the West Borrowed from Asia and What It Left Behind Jan Krikke October 8, 2026 The article was originally published here In the late 1960s, the musical Hair announced that the Age of Aquarius was dawning. Its opening anthem promised a transformation of human consciousness: an era of peace, harmony and understanding. Half a century later, a familiar echo of that promise is a meditation app offered by your employer. You can find it in the same list of benefits as the pension plan and the gym discount. How did a spiritual revolution become an employee benefit? The answer lies in the history of the movement known as New Age: where it came from, what it borrowed from Asia, and why the meaning of what it borrowed changed in the process. Two definitions will help. New Age is a loose label for a wide range of spiritual practices and...
Screenshot 2026-10-04 210142
Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....