“Breaking Point: The War That Changed The Rules”

Jan Oberg

March 26, 2026

Those who have followed TFF over the decades will remember that we were engaged in conflict-mitigation in all parts of Yugoslavia from 1991 and beyond 2000. It is all to be found in our 2200-A4 pages equivalent online documentation, Yugoslavia – What Should Have Been Done? – which is unique for two reasons. First, it was written on the go, so to speak, and not years after it all happened. Not one comma has been changed, so everyone can see where, at the time, we were right and where we were wrong.

Secondly, it is a systematic documentation of the de-facto peace prevention conducted by NATO/EU countries that understood woefully little of the complexities of Yugoslavia, ignored international law – like when recognising Slovenia and Croatia out of Yugoslavia and thereby making the war in Bosnia unavoidable and when ruthlessly bombing Kosovo and Serbia without a UN mandate and making every peaceful solution to that conflict impossible and violated the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Yugoslavia.

We also criticised the Dayton Accords and predicted they would never bring true peace to Bosnia-Hercegovina.

I am happy also to also remind you that TFF was the first organisation to propose, in September 1991, that UN Peace-Keeping missions be deployed to the Krajina areas of Croatia – in September 1991. It turned out that former Secretary of State, Cyrus Vance – who was one of a handful together with Lord Carrington and a number of UN leaders who did understand the complexities of the region – was working at the same time on exactly that idea with the leadership in Belgrade and Zagreb. You’ll find TFF’s proposal for that in the report – embedded in “Yugoslavia – What Should Have Been Done?” called “After Yugoslavia – What?”

Our conflict-mediation team spent 1995-1999 doing mediation in the conflict between the Kosovo-Albanians, who, under the nonviolent leadership of Dr Ibrahim Rugova wanted to secede from Serbia/Yugoslavia in which it had a wide-ranging autonomous status and become an independent state, on the one hand, and three governments in Belgrade, among them that of Milan Panic, and we also met with President Milosevic who took a serious interest in our independent work.

The report just mentioned contains, among many numerous other articles, the framework proposal in the shape of a legal document that could have secured a negotiation process in peace and towards peace. It was the only independent proposal that obtain widespread positive reaction in both the Serbia and tehe Kosovo-Albanian media.

NATO’s reckless bombing of course destroyed all those elements of a peaceful solution to the conflict. Instead of that, the West helped establish and arm a then-murky force behind the back of Dr Rugova called the Kosovo Liberation Army – KLA or UCK. It was the German intelligence service BND, CIA and other violence-promoting actors who built the KLA to become NATO’s ground troops and provide intelligence on the ground for NATO’s bombing.

The whole thing was sold to the world with arguments like Milosevic was Europe’s new Hitler (Bill Clinton), he was planning a genocide on the Albanians in Kosovo and this – none other, by the way – was a case where the newly invented concept of humanitarian intervention/The Responsibility To Protect – had to be use. None of us who were there and worked 24/7 believed a word of all these de facto lies.

Sadly, as series of intellectuals in both Eastern and Western Europe believed this fake and omission, and the black-and-whiting if everything into the simplifying Serbs as only bad guys and everybody else as only good guys.

This was also the war in which the marketing of simplifying narratives and sophisticated media warfare became systematic and powerful. However, contrary to today’s wars and genocides, there were cracks in the media walls where experts like those in TFF’s conflict-mitigation team could get through to media like CNN, public service media in Scandinavia, German and many other media with view from on the ground. This ended 100% with the – failed – regime-change attempt by the US/NATO in Syria and the liberation of Aleppo in December 2016 from 4,5 years of terrorist occupation.

I have just returned from Belgrade, where I participated in the premiere of a very important and revealing new documentary that was shown to half a million viewers on RTS on March 24, 2026, the day that marked the 27th memorial anniversary of NATO’s first illegal, out-of-area bombing of a country and its capital. This documentary, excellently produced by Sladjana Zaric of RTS, is special in the sense that only foreigners participate in it (I am one of them).

In my view, it also reveals how much of what was done – allegedly to help Yugoslavia and preserve peace – was either ill-informed, ill-willed or simply a cynical use of the country’s crisis and dissolution processes for self-serving purposes, such a exploiting the weakness of Russia, getting the US Bondsteel Base in Kosovo, divide-and-rule by splitting up a confederation into smaller states that could later become NATO and/or EU members and – implicitly perhaps – to undermine the tremendous importance of the United Nations.

Tragically, Yugoslavia became a testbed for everything we have seen ever since. In this sense, as I argued at the time, much more important to world history than the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Since 1999, NATO has been a criminal organisation in the sense that this operation had no UN mandate, and it was a clear violation of NATO’s own Treaty, which is a copy of the UN Charter, advocates purely defensive help to other members if they are attacked and states that disputes shall be transferred to the UN. As I have argued ever since, NATO had nothing to do anywhere in former Yugoslavia or in any other place we’ve seen it, including for instance Libya and Ukraine.

And it is certainly only defensive in its treaty words, not in what it does. The word “defensive” is nothing but propaganda since it also builds on the concept of offensive deterrence both in its conventional sphere and as a nuclear weapons- and first-use-based construct.

Some of the readers may remember that RTS’s building was bombed and 16 media staff were killed on the spot. This is what it looks like today:

And here follow some images from the press conference at the RTS Club, the morning news studio, Sladjana Zaric with images of a couple of the 32 RTS documentaries – or films as she calls them – that she has produced over 20 years, and a peep into one of RTS’s offices.

And here is the documentary that – it goes without saying – that I recommend that you see and reflect a bit on. My own thought at seeing it is this is that – in spite of today’s instant communication – perhaps it does take about a quarter of a century before the lies and propaganda are revealed and at least some elements of the larger truth begin to surface.

My thoughts on this video, therefore, also go to the victims in Venezuela, in Gaza and in Iran these very days. I wish it shall not take that long for people to recognise that they are being fed with narratives, fake and propaganda, to cover up for systematic international law violations and bestial cruelty by the US and Israel.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

One Response

  1. I remember Milosevic, who was not guilty of any crime, saying that a breakaway part of the country wanted 35% of the country but only represented 15% of the population and the land they were after was the richest part of the country. He was not being unreasonable merely pointing out the facts. Furthermore he was not whipping up violence but dialogue with the murderous NATO members. I did not, then, understand how NATO could justify their presence, but came to understand later, there was never any justification and it was all about balkanisation and nothing to do with “humanitarian intervention/The Responsibility To Protect”. So thank you for this article, much appreciated.

Related Posts

It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
How Oxford University Press allowed a personality‑driven narrative to masquerade as scholarship. Jan Oberg, dr hc, TFF director This article has also been published on TFF Substack where more readers react and withdraw their interviews from the project. A Special Issue in a scholarly journal is not an ordinary publication. It is a collective, curated […]

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...