Jan Oberg’s Prime Minister Speech on the Corona crisis

Or your government leader’s Coronavirus speech that was never given.

Do not believe the future will be better before you hear leaders say something like this…

The speech can be seen as part of TFF’s Campaign “Convert Military Expenditures to Global Problem-Solving”.

https://vimeo.com/496060959

See and listen to the speech by clicking on Vimeo above, or read the transcript below.

Fellow Citizens, good evening

Tonight, I want to share with you the main lessons my government and I have drawn from the Coronavirus crisis – a crisis which has caused so much suffering and so many deaths. And a crisis that will take very long time for our economy to recover from.

That lesson – and my central message to you tonight – is that your suffering has been caused by our failed security policies. Only, secondarily, is this a crisis of our health system.

Therefore, I want to extend my most profound apology to each and everyone of you in our country on behalf of my government.

The pandemic as well as other purely civilian crises had been predicted. But we ignored the warnings. We now recognise our full responsibility and hope for your understanding and forgiveness.

So how could this pandemic take us by surprise? How could we be so unprepared?

First of all, let me say:

The main – only – reason for our Covid-19 policy failure is that we have been obsessively focused on purely military means for our so-called ”national security.” We’ve allocated literally all the resources (that is, your tax money) to the military sector – so much so that our society became highly militarized but also more and more vulnerable and indefensible. That was not the right way to spend your tax money. And not the right way to honour your trust in us!

Over time, we were blinded by arms production and export profit interests of tiny but powerful elites. We chose to listen only to advisers who were, in reality, not objective but repeatedly advocated higher military expenditures because it benefited themselves. We were also influenced by powerful lobbying groups. We chose to listen to other kinds of expertise.

In the process we created enemies and invented threats to be able to always justify these new weapons and higher military expenditures. But, in reality, we were our own worst enemies.

Because . . . if weapons could bring peace, we would today have a wonderful peaceful world with vision and optimism. We all know that we do not live in such a world.

The fact is that this government – also I myself – gave speeches about human security and common security and peace but never asked ourselves what those words meant. As a result, militarist thinking and the Military-Industrial Complex has become an unbearable burden on our civil economy and all of society. In addition, it threatens our democracy and our wellbeing as we have just seen in this crisis.

We cannot ourselves be safe with others if they do not feel safe with us. Self-defence is right and in accordance with international law; but having long-ranger offensive weapons that automatically threatens somebody far away can only lead to arms races, never bring peace, only endless war.

What we need now instead is confidence-building – bridges – not confrontation-building and walls. We need to build peace first and then secure it. Because it’s a proven fact that the present security thinking will never bring peace to the world.

Secondly…

Under my leadership, the government shall move away from the military-dominated security policies and give priority to human and common security for all.

Therefore, we have now established a national high-level and very broad-based Future Peace and Security Commission. It’s mandate is to – as quickly as possible – develop a strategy and a concrete three-years plan for a fundamental change in our defence, security and foreign policy.

This new policy shall, above all, allocate resources to provide human security in a wide sense, including protecting citizens’ lives, a first-class health care system, civil defence, storing the resources and goods needed during emergencies and prepare society’s various authorities to serve you, the citizens, in times of crises.

This new strategy called”Peace First” shall adapt our capacities and institutions to strictly adhere to the UN Charter – because all UN members – also our country – have signed that Charter and it states that ”peace shall be created by peaceful means” (Article 1).

We, the member states, must not continue to ignore international law.

Fellow citizens!

Someone has to take the first steps and we will. We’ll get nowhere if every country waits for someone else to take the first step. We will take it and thereby invite a much-needed snowball effect.

We shall then free resources – in fact billions upon billions of dollars – and re-allocate them to meet the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). We have human rights but we also have duties and one of them is to reduce suffering! There is no reason that people shall go hungry to bed.

Third – and finally: What will this mean for our country?

You can expect a reduction of our military expenditure by 50% within these three years and a conversion of industrial, administrative, scientific and other resources to boost civilian human security.

It is a safe strategy. No one will take advantage of our military reduction. Instead, the countries we have characterised as enemies will be grateful to no longer feel targeted by us and thereby we open up for cooperation instead of confrontation. Security with, not against, each other.

This also means that my government shall work for the abolition of nuclear weapons. For the first time in the nuclear age, we now have a legally binding Nuclear Weapon Ban Treaty that is ratified by over 50 governments around the world and aims at total nuclear abolition.

This is civilisational progress and we want our country to be among the pioneers of that desired nuclear-free and much safer world.

You may now ask: What about our country’s highly qualified military personnel? Here is my answer: Some will continue in their present roles while we transform our national defence forces to a purely defensive mode. Others will be transferred to new civilian security sectors. I want to assure you that no one will lose her or his employment but many will change jobs so their competence, skills and experience serve all society and not just a few.

That’s common sense too for two reasons. This policy will be a boost to our economy – secondly, I am sure that no human being wants to be employed to plan – ultimately – death and destruction if there are better alternatives for the common good. And of course there are!

My government and I have drawn the main lesson from the terrible Coronavirus: We abandoned you, the people, when you most needed us and it must never happen again.

My apology would, however, be empty words if we did not make concrete changes in the wake of what we have seen worldwide in 2020. The Corona crisis is an opportunity to learn important lessons about our failed security thinking and to do things right in the future.

So, we look forward to working with you all – in our own country and worldwide – to realize the only vision that truly matters now: To reduce the violence against other people, other cultures and against Mother Nature and create peace in diversity . . . peaceful coexistence.

The world’s multi-crises call for determined action now – no more piecemeal politics and muddling through. We know that tomorrow will be decided by the choices we make – or dont make – today. We must rise over petty differences and pull together. Our common interests on this planet are much stronger than our small differences.

Humanity is faced with an existential choice now: It’s either continued violence and no existence or co-operation and peaceful co-existence.

The sooner we make that right choice, the easier it will be to save humanity from impending catastrophes.

Thank you very much for your attention! I won’t ask God to bless you or our country. Instead, let’s bless each other as peacemakers.

Thank you!

If you believe this speech presented useful perspectives, TFF shall be grateful for your support here

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

5 Responses

  1. Sure you can build a secure state, but complete reduction of intelligent military does NOT make it safe. We need a modern effective peoples army for military safety and today that also means the ability to defend against an AI drone invasion.

  2. Thanks, Martin G – but I am sure you have missed something when you refer to “complete reduction” – I am talking about trans-armanent and not total disarament. But thanks anyhow! – Best Jan

  3. Civil resistance has its points when already invaded and might work against an army and another people with democracy and human feelings for you, but hardly against an army of lizard-brains and their robots that will only consider you low-life vermin. Then you will be slaughtered as a sitting duck. They will just use any method they can to eliminate you. Genocide. In this moment it ist too late to rethink strategy.

Related Posts

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...