PressInfo #54 – Why These ‘Peace’ Efforts Can’t Bring Peace to Kosovo ” The international community lacks professionalism, resources and vision. “

In a large interview with the leading Kosovo-Albanian
weekly “ZËRI” on December 22, TFF director Jan Oberg
challenges the international community’s whole approach to
conflict-resolution and peace. He also believes that the
policy of positioning and the focus on formal status pursued
by the parties is counterproductive.

It’s time, he maintains, to listen to the needs of
citizens, to address real issues of daily life and to
introduce some new ideas and actors.

Governments have failed on all sides. Their diplomats
may be great lawyers but they lack professional knowledge
and training in conflict analysis, conflict psychology,
social issues and mediation techniques. This is simply not
the way to proceed if you want to help people to live in
peace.”

Read the
interview in its entirety

Here follow excerpts:

“Modern history is full of conflicts at least as bad as
that in Kosovo that have been overcome by nonviolence.”

“What I have said here applies also to the international
community’s “conflict managers”. Neither the US nor the EU
did anything systematic, based on analysis, about the Kosovo
conflict. They waited for a decade until the “only way” was
to threaten NATO bombings…”

“Some of you may think that the US/NATO would do
something here to support you – forget it.”

“The Milosevic-Holbrooke agreement is a ‘deal’ about
power and, like in Dayton, nobody will ask the people living
in the region whether they like it or not. Nobody who works
professionally with conflict-resolution, mediation and peace
would call this anything but a deal.”

“Whatever political solution will one day be found – the
citizens of Kosovo/a will need help to recover,
reconciliate, build trust. In the best of cases, peace can
be built from the ground-up.”

“So far in this ‘peace’ process, there is no negotiation
institution, only an American ambassador from Skopje who
cannot be neutral because he is American and Americans have
foreign policy interests here. OSCE is a government
organisation; no NGOs have been asked to help in this
situation – although there are hundreds like TFF around the
world who happens to know a bit. You see, governments think
they know best – but look at the world…”

“If I look at what the “international community” – in
reality some handful of ministers and presidents – has done
in Croatia and Bosnia and now in Kosovo since 1991, I would
prefer to talk about preventING diplomacy.”

“I am not a lawyer and would never perform in that role.
But lawyers, diplomats and military people never seem to
hesitate to perform a role in a field they have no
professional training in: that of mediation, peace proposal
production and conflict-resolution. You know, no
international organizations employ or train such people. So,
some modesty would be in place as it is a science and an art
to help people solve their conflicts. It’s an academic
subject at universities around the world.”

“If I was a mediator I would, after a ceasefire, have
started in the other end of the spectrum and asked: what are
the needs of the citizens who live in Kosovo? So, go out in
the streets of Pristina and the villages of Kosovo and ask:
what do you need, what do you want? I think people will
answer: good health care, better kindergartens and education
at all levels, a higher level of material wellbeing,
cultural expression, freedom of movement, freedom to think
and speak openly, safety, being treated with respect, a
clean environment, and they will ask for media they can
trust, etc.Then: Imagine that the parties sat down with
international expertise discussing all these substantial
issues and negotiated about them.”

“Somebody must have noticed that we are never going to
get to a result by stating positions: WE want a sovereign
Serbia! We want an independent Kosova! My question is: what
is good about this positioning if both alternatives means a
life in misery, repression, hate and fear for generations
ahead?”

“Trust can lead to negotiations in good faith about
formalities such as status of the province. Without that,
negotiations cannot lead to trust. Nothing can be achieved
before there is a minimum of trust. And trust comes from
listening, understanding and exploring better future
possibilities – together.”

“If people such as Milosevic, Rugova, Holbrooke, Hill,
Demaqi etc. had to listen and were forced to follow what
citizens told them – they would not find the whole game such
great fun and they would no longer belong to the immensely
powerful jet-set…”

“By letting the “international community” meddle in your
affairs you reduce yourselves to those who just react, your
conflict is stolen from you and the “solution” will be
theirs and none of the people of Kosovo/a will be
consulted.”

“Let is be the free market the Americans love and have
many competing, attrative plans for peace and a better
future – all the leagal stuff in Ambassaor Hill’s plans is
important – but secondary and far too limited to create
peace among human beings.”

“However, in the eyes of the big guys, the mighty policy
makers in Washington, London, Bonn, Moscow etc – you are
just a little piece in a jigsaw puzzle. I don’t want to be
cynical, but I don’t think they care much for your future,
my future or that of our children.”

“You would be better served by helping yourselves and not
keep on running stubborn position-policies which invites the
big internationals to intervene and look like saviours and
protectors of your rights and lives.

Only you can save yourselves – and my first advice is
always: Lay down the arms, stop using all kinds of violence.
Attack your problems, not the people on the other side.”

” If I sat in Belgrade I would say to myself: well, the
repression and police violence we used did not work, Serbia
is now put under administration by OSCE, NATO, the West
European Union – which is what we wanted to avoid. We must
change our strategy! If I sat in Pristina I would say: well,
passive violence didn’t work and the war conducted by KLA
was no good either. So, we must change our strategy! You
see, I am convinced that human beings can learn, can
change…”

© TFF 1999

Click NEW for more
interesting peace stuff – also on Kosovo

• You are welcome to re-print, copy, archive, quote
from or re-post this item, but please retain the source.

• TFF’s website has all the relevant links to Iraq,
the Balkans, including media there + peace research, and
non-violence

• Teacher, activist, journalist?? You’ll always find
something interesting at TFF.

• Get your daily global news from the leading media
on TFF’s site, all in one place.

• On January 4, Washington
Post called TFF an “organization which aggressively uses the
web” and quoted PressInfo 52 “Be Better Informed About the
Iraq Conflict”…

• They are right, this is a dynamic site, always serving concerned citizens.

• Now around 100.000 “hits” per month and featured regularly on OneWorld’s supersite.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...