Kjell Magnusson, en av Sveriges främsta Balkan-experter, skrev en klok och välinformerad artikel OM konflikten i Makedonien, Baftije Mehmedi ett partsinlägg I konflikten. Bådadera hör hemma i en fri debatt, men bör inte förväxlas. Mehmedis tonläge gör nog karaktären av partsinlägg klart för de flesta. Grundläggande osanningar bör dock påpekas för dem som inte kan alla detaljer. Jag håller mig till Makedonien och låter Kosovo ligga.

Uppgifterna om folkräkningar är osanna. År 1991 skattades den albanska befolkningen till 21 procent, vilket var högre än 1981. Den internationellt förberedda och kontrollerade folkräkningen 1994 kom upp till 23 procent. Då etniskt albanska kvinnor föder omkring sex barn och etniskt makedoniska litet över två, kan dagens tal rimligen vara c:a 27 procent. Bägge folkgrupperna har många utlandsarbetare, så eventuella skillnader i relativt antal kan högst förskjuta detta tal c:a en procent uppåt. Det har förekommit omfattande illegal invandring från Albanien och Kosovo, som det just därför är svårt att sätta procenttal på. Illegala invandrare skulle i svenska folkräkningar inte medräknas utan utvisas.

De mera bisarra påståendena kan vederläggas omedelbart. Makedonien blev en republik i Jugoslavien 1945, då makedoniska blev officiellt språk både i republiken och i hela landet (vid sidan av slovenska och serbokroatiska). Språket ligger närmast bulgariska, och bulgariska nationalister, vilka Mehmedi tydligen tror på, hävdar att det är en dialekt. Med samma rätt kunde man hävda att norska inte finns, men är en dialekt av danska. Gudskelov är de albanska partiledningarna i Makedonien mycket klokare än Mehmedi och vet att man inte kan komma i dialog med en motpart genom att förneka hans existens.

Makedoniens ledning, regeringen, har i tio år bestått av politiska partier från båda folkgrupperna. De har förhandlat om frågor som är besvärliga, eftersom båda (även efter regeringsskifte) sitter i klämma mellan sin regeringspartner och oppositionspartiet inom sin egen folkgrupp. Makedoniens grundlag och relevant lagstiftning blev 1991 godkända av EU:s Badinterkommission i fråga om mänskliga rättigheter och minoritetsskydd.

På papperet har albanerna i Makedonien det i dessa avseenden minst lika bra som de större ryska minoriteterna i Estland och Lettland (och oändlig mycket bättre än kurderna i Turkiet). Hur det ser ut i verkligheten är i samtliga fall en annan fråga.

Vid vilken procent har en minoritet rätt att komma med bland statens officiella språk vid sidan av det största? Om vi går efter Schweiz, så har albanerna den rätten, men tillsammans med turkar, roma och serber. Går vi efter Finland, har de den ensam. Och går vi efter Estland och Lettland, så har de inte den. Låt oss bara hoppas att ryssarna i dessa stater inte griper till uppror/terrorism för att förbättra sitt förhandlingsläge.

Sveriga har bara statliga universitet, andra länder kombinerar statliga privata och konfessionella. Där gör alla arbetsgivare en rangordning av dem efter kvalitet. Mehmedi säger att det privata universitetet i Tetovo och det statliga i Skopje kan jämföras med Lund och Uppsala. Även de minst nationalistiska makedoniska professorer jag talat med säger att det kan de absolut inte. Själv kan jag inte ha en välgrundad uppfattning, men det kunde OSSE ju låta en expertgrupp ta ställning till.

En del stridsfrågor är i första hand symboliska – och därför svårlösta eftersom BÅDA parter lägger stor vikt vid symboler. Andra handlar om fördelning av olika godor, i första hand jobb. Men Makedonien är ruinerat av Väst de sista tio åren (utan att detta var avsikten). Effekterna för landet (och alla grupper i det) av ekonomiska sanktioner mot Jugoslavien, det tysk-grekiska spelet om erkännanden, bombningarnas effekter på ekonomier och flyktingar, o.s.v., är att Väst har kostat det bortåt 100 miljarder kronor. Detta är flera års BNP. Man har bara fått en rent symbolisk kompensation. I dag driver Väst på för ännu högre arbetslöshet genom nedskärningar av offentliga jobb, privatiseringar, o.s.v. Innan Väst bättrar sig på dessa punkter, finns det ingen chans för förbättringar för NÅGON folkgrupp i Makedonien. Landet behöver pengar, inte pekfingrar, från Väst.

Det kanske vore bäst för både makedoner och albaner att ett område lämnar Makedonien – om man kan finna ett fredligt avtal om principerna för gränsdragning – och kommer under internationell förvaltning a la Kosovo. Det senare har varit en välsignelse för Jugoslavien ur rent ekonomisk synpunkt. Men så ser de flesta serber inte saken, och de flesta makedoner skulle också vara totalt emot. Stormakterna har hängt upp så mycket prestige på att folk som inte vill leva samman i en stat i alla fall skall göra det (och de som vill får inte lov) att denna lösning nog är helt utesluten. Makedoner och albaner är dömda till samlevnad. Politiskt våld kan bara göra den värre för alla parter. Om albanska grupper anser att de har “rätt” till det, skall det nog snart komma makedoniska grupper med samma uppfattning, oavsett vad regeringen tycker. Så är helvetet löst, särskilt som risken för regional spridning är långt större än i något av de tidigare krigen.

*Artikeln blev refuserad av Aftonbladet.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Photo above: Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd’s Non-Violence outside UN Headquarters in New York. Kirill Levin, CC BY-NC-SA 2. Jan Oberg November 3, 2026 I am happy to be published in Horizons which is produced by the Center for International Relations and Sustainable Development, CIRSD, in Belgrade. My contribution brings out a radical re-thinking of what concepts such as defence, security, deterrence – and peace – may mean if we want to create a more peaceful world. It also summarises a few things I have been working with the last few decades. Please read it here Og her er den på dansk, takket være Johnny Baltzersens lynhurtige oversættelse
UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Photo above: Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd’s Non-Violence outside UN Headquarters in New York. Kirill Levin, CC BY-NC-SA 2. Jan Oberg November 3, 2026 I am happy to be published in Horizons which is produced by the Center for International Relations and Sustainable Development, CIRSD, in Belgrade. My contribution brings out a radical re-thinking of what concepts such as defence, security, deterrence – and peace – may mean if we want to create a more peaceful world. It also summarises a few things I have been working with the last few decades. Please read it here Og her er den på dansk, takket være Johnny Baltzersens lynhurtige oversættelse
UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
Read More
knotted gun
Photo above: Carl Fredrik Reuterswärd’s Non-Violence outside UN Headquarters in New York. Kirill Levin, CC BY-NC-SA 2. Jan Oberg November 3, 2026 I am happy to be published in Horizons which is produced by the Center for International Relations and Sustainable Development, CIRSD, in Belgrade. My contribution brings out a radical re-thinking of what concepts such as defence, security, deterrence – and peace – may mean if we want to create a more peaceful world. It also summarises a few things I have been working with the last few decades. Please read it here Og her er den på dansk, takket være Johnny Baltzersens lynhurtige oversættelse
TFFPortfolioVign
UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
JoGSS-Silent
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
Screenshot 2026-10-26 115647
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Screenshot 2026-10-15 141837
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...