Appeal for Peace 1999 Join the Citizens Peace Conference in the Hague, the Netherlands
May 1999

While the specific details of our conference will continue to evolve over the coming months, the overall theme is one of Delegitimizing War – Leaving War Behind. The following text invites your organization’s support and active involvement. At the Hague you will be able to hold your own meetings, join a central congress, attend a concert, maybe even a peace film festival.

Won’t you please fax or mail us your response today?

Help us end this century on a note of non-violence and launch a new century with commitment to peace!Sincerely

Maj-Britt Theorin
President, International Peace Bureau

Sir Peter Ustinov
President, World Federalist Movement

Josepf Rotblat
Professor, Nobel Peace laureate

Why Organize a Peace Conference?

After a decade of world corganized along sectoral and geographic lines: on peace and religion, peace and art, peace and sustainable development, peace and women, etc.

Who will plan the conference?

The coordinating committee is forming an international steering committee of organizations from all regions and sectors who support the Hague Appeal for Peace. This Committee will develop and implement overall goals and programs for the conference.

We invite you to endorse the plans for the conference and indicate your interest in participating.Hague Appeal

It was the worst of centuries
and the best of centuries.

The past 99 years have seen more death, and more brutal death, from war, famine, and other preventable causes than any other timespan in history. They have seen the tender flame of democracy snuffed out again and again by crazed dictators and military men in pursuit of power. They have seen the widening of the gulf between the favored of the earth and the wretched of the earth and the growing callousness of the former toward the latter.

But the years have also witnessed the power of the people to resist and overcome present oppression as well as age-old prejudices of gender against gender, race against race, religion against religion, and ethnic group against ethnic group.

These years have witnessed an explosion of scientific and technical knowledge which make possible a decent life for all who inhabit this planet, the formulation of a set of universal rights which, if taken seriously, would translate that possibility into reality, and the infancy of a system of global governance which, if allowed to grow, could guide this transition.

We, members and representatives of people’s organizations from many cultures and spheres of society, mindful of the dual history of this century, issue the followimg appeal to ourselves and to those who profess to lead us:

  • As civilization has laegely left behind slavery, colonialism and apartheid, let the 21st century be the first century without war.
  • Let us find ways- and implement the ways already available- to prevent conflict by removing its causes, which include the unequal distribution of the world’s vast resources, the hostility of nations and of groups within nations toward each other, and the presence of ever more deadly arsenals of conventional weapons and weapons of mass destruction whose internal logic demand that they be used.
  • When conflicts arise, as they inevitably will despite our best efforts, let us find ways- and implement the ways already available- to resolve them without resort to violence.
  • Let us, in short, complete the work of the Peace Conference held in the Hague a century ago by returning to the grand vision of general and complete disarmament which flickered briefly on the world stage after the last World War. This will require new structures for peace and a fundamentally strengthened international legal order.

Specifically, let us find the moral, spiritual, and political will to do what our leaders know must be done but cannot bring themselves to do:

*Abolish nuclear weapons, land mines, and all other weapons incompatibel with humanitarian law;

*Abolish the arms trade, or at least reduce it to levels comatible with the prohibition of aggression enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations; and

*Use the tremendous resources liberated by an end or reduction of the arms race for the eradication of poverty and preservation of the environment.


In pursuing these goals, let us commit to initiating the final steps for abolishing war, for replacing the law of force with the force of law.

For Endorsement/Participation

Name and Title ____________________________________________

Organization ____________________________________________

Address ____________________________________________

____________________________________________

Phone/Fax ______________________________________

Email _______________________

My organization would like to participate
in the peace conference Hague Appeal for Peace 1999.

My organization endorses conferences on children, environment, human rights, social development, population, advancement of women, and habitat, we believe the last major peace conference of the century should be on peace. This time, civil society will organize the main conference, not governments.

While the specific details of our conference will continue to evolve over the coming months, the overall theme is one of Time to Abolish War-Deligitimizing War. During the last two centuries, humanity largely abolished and outlawed slavery, colonialism, and apartheid. Now, after the bloodiest century in history, it is time to take the final steps in outlawing war.

Why in 1999, in the Hague, Holland?

The city of the Hague is becoming the world’s international law capital.
In 1899, the first International Peace Conference took place in the Hague at the initiative of Russian Czar Nicholas II. The Hague Conference was unique- unlike almost all previous peace conferences, it was constituted not to conclude or settle a war, but to discuss the establishment of permanent mechanisms of international law for the purposes of disarmament, prevention of war, and the peaceful settlement of disputes. The 1899 peace conference was followed by a second in 1907, largely inspired by citizen peace societies. These conferences made historic advances in developing international humanitarian law, establishing the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA,) and planting seeds for the League of Nations, Permanent Court of Justice and their successors- the United Nations and the International Court of Justice. Both the PCA and the ICJ are located in the Peace Palace in the Hague.

As the draft vision statement describes (see reverse) after a century of terrible wars civil society is planning a major, end-of-the-century peace conference in The Hague to coincide with the 100th anniversary of the first International Peace Conference. We are also monitoring and supporting the plans of the Russian Federation, the Netherlands, and the Non-Aligned Movement for a major intergovernmental- perhaps UN- conference in 1999.

What form will the conference take?

We plan a core conference including the three major issues of the 1899 peace conference:

  • strengthening international humanitarian law and institutions
  • promoting fundamental disarmament measures,
  • reinforcing mechanisms for the peaceful settlement of international conflicts.

In addition, we will focus on the causes of war and the global measures necessary for achieving political and economic justice, respect for human rights, and international democracy.

The Hague Appeal will advance many proposals, such as the establishment of a permanent International Criminal Court, strengthened emergency humanitarian and peacekeeping mechanisms, agencies for early warning, conflict prevention, and post-conflict reconstruction, expanded authority in the regulation of weapons production and trade, and advancement of the culture and education for peace.

Please return to:

HAP-99, c/o WFM, 777 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017 USA fax 1-212-599-1332 or to

IALANA, Anna Paulownastr. 103, 2518 BC Den Haag, the Netherlands fax 31-70-3455951.

More information from

Patrick McCarthy, c/o The International Peace Bureau, Geneva.

Fax +41-22-738 9419 – Phone +41-22-741-4010- E-mail p_mccarthy@iprolink.ch

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...