PressInfo #151 – Three minutes silence for the deadin Afghanistan and three otherpeacemaking suggestions

Remember the innocent dead in Afghanistan too

In many countries around the world, including NATO and the EU, governments and citizens observed three minutes of silence for the innocent victims killed in the terrorist attack upon the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon on the 11th of September last year. In Denmark, for instance, a memorial service was also held in Copenhagen with representatives from the government, the Royal family and from The United States.

Out of a similar humanitarian consideration, it is my opinion that the same countries should show the innocent victims killed in Afghanistan the same honour. On the grounds of principle and because there is an obvious connection between the two events.

All religions maintain that each human life is sacred. Humanism is built, amongst other things, upon the premise that each and every human life is just as valuable as all others, no matter what the nationality, race, skin colour, gender, etc. There is therefore no doubt that the innocent human lives lost in Afghanistan are of exactly the same value as each of the almost 3000 innocent lives that were taken on the 11th of September.

Careful calculations have estimated that 3500 civilians have lost their lives as a result of the USA bombing campaign since the 7th October (Prof. Marc Herold, University of New Hampshire, USA). On top of this can be added the killing of half military groups and those the USA call illegitimate combatants, which are also not considered to be soldiers. As just one example from the months of bombing, the American Green Berets ‘Tiger 03’ team together with the bombers, killed 1300 supposed Taliban and Al-Quida men in one day, the 29th December (Ben Fenton, Telegraph, 8th January 2002). Since then, there have been many further reports of innocent deaths.

In addition to all this is all that we are as yet unaware of because, for differing reasons, it is kept secret. There are the people that have starved to death, or the children and the old that have been overcome fleeing from the bombs and by the acts of war. Then, over and above this is the well known phenomenon that a portion of the survivors will take their own lives after the worst of their experiences are over. And these also are a result of the continued effects of war.

An international war crimes tribunal for Afghanistan

Therefore, one cannot exclude the possibility that up to 5,000, maybe even 10,000 innocent civilians could have been killed by now. To achieve clarity over these and many other related questions, governments should firstly suggest the creation of a Hague-like tribunal for Afghanistan. This could function until the planned permanent International War Crimes Court has been established. It would allow for both the Afghani and the international sides of the conflict and their actions within the conflict to be explained in depth.

As is already known, the United States does not support the coming International Criminal Court because it will not accept that American citizens could be judged by anyone other than American authorities. The consideration paid to the letter and spirit of international justice, as well as to a sense of justice, should indisputably weigh heavier than considerations paid to the sensitivity of the United States since it is fighting a war against a country that has not attacked it.

And a Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Afghanistan

Truth and Reconciliation Commissions, TRCs, slowly win through, but they do not justify or promote, to the same degree as courts and tribunals do, the division into the good guys who can take on the role of judge, and the bad guys who shall receive punishment. They are not swayed by feelings of revenge. For exactly this reason, TRCs can play a vital role, possibly even more so than a court, in the long-term work of healing and normalising the life of communities after war.

It should therefore be completely natural that Western governments, either alone or together with others, should suggest the creation of (and take the lead in the financing of) an international TRC which will bring forth the truth about the past 25 years of conflict and war actions in Afghanistan.

It would include the activities of non-Afghani parties related to the conflict in and against Afghanistan, and cover a period from well before the Soviet Union’s invasion to the events of today. As in the Balkans, the population has fought internally against each other, but they have also been a pawn in a much larger game in relation to both the ‘old’ Cold War conflict formations and in the global restructuring and power struggle since 1989.

Such a commission would be able to lay open which roles foreign intelligence services have played, the roles of weapons dealers, the financing of the Taliban, the importance of the oil business, as well as how Afghanistan has come to play a central role in the world-wide drugs problem.

Focus on the deeply human dimension when rebuilding Afghanistan

The rebuilding of Afghanistan will take decades. The International community’s contributions after war are often limited to humanitarian assistance, loans and credit, and help rebuilding roads, power installations and telephone systems. At best, they attempt to support the civilian communities by establishing courts of justice, educating police and with other similar schemes. These contributions are necessary, but never sufficient in a country that is suffering the aftermath of war.

The purely human dimensions are seldom addressed: how should we help people through the sorrow, the anger, the trauma and the hatred? How should we help them to respect each other and to live together once again in tolerance? How do we reduce their fear of revenge from ‘the other side’ that could threaten their new future? How to help the children and the young who are always particularly vulnerable? How to create better school text books than those that merely bring forth the winner’s vision and therefore saddle generations of children and young with guilt for what has happened in the past?

All of this is not just about money. It’s about people being educated to support others psychologically and socially, people with both empathy – the ability to identify, to sympathise – and love. It could be doctors, nurses, social workers, psychologists, priests, youth leaders, educationalists, child psychiatrists, etc. If we can send soldiers, then we should also be able to send these kinds of people.

In the Nordic countries, for instance, we still find a tradition of fundamental humanism thanks to such things as the folk high schools, the free schools, the grass roots, gender equality and the welfare state model. These countries have traditionally ranked high in terms of giving foreign aid and being hospitable to refugees and others in need.

The Nordic countries are not considered imperialists by others in the world. These are assets of tremendous value and should be put to good use in times of crisis. We should consequently render an exceptional humanitarian, peace building contribution, which is directed specifically to the people of Afghanistan and rebuilds souls, not just buildings.

It will also make us greater humanists

Some would maybe believe that holding three minutes silence for the dead in Afghanistan, diminishes the meaning of the catastrophe in the USA. This point of view does not hold. We should remember that quantitatively the United States has approximately 12 times as many inhabitants as Afghanistan does. In purely quantitative terms, therefore, 3000 dead is 12 times the catastrophe for Afghanistan than it is for the U.S. Three minutes silence and a remembrance service for those that have died in Afghanistan would remove any doubt that we differentiate between human lives. It would make us greater humanitarians.

Western governments, the Nordic in particular, must take responsibility

I take for granted that even smaller sovereign states such as Denmark and Sweden can exercise a certain independence in foreign policies. I, therefore, call upon Western government in general and the Nordic in particular to take the initiative to make the following suggestions into practical policies:

1) demonstrate respect visibly for all innocent dead, including those of Afghanistan;

2) propose a war tribunal for Afghanistan, to be transferred at a later date to the coming International Criminal Court;

3) propose an International Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and

4) render a new type of contribution to peace and reconciliation that is directed towards the individual inhabitants of Afghanistan.

© TFF 2002

Translated from Danish by Theresa Marlan

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...