The real story: How Milosevic was much more evil than you ever knew # 3

Generic thumbnail

By Jan Oberg, TFF director
Lund, Sweden – March 12-13, 2006

How soft-headed to call Milosevic a butcher only

My objective research lead me to conclude that there is some strange kind of softness or sentimentalism now this evil man has died. The media and the Western diplomats who speak about him these days should grasp the broader and deeper dimensions of his conspiracy, his intrigue and his Fascist plan and not only call him a butcher. “Butcher” is kind of too homy, if you see what I mean, makes this Balkan Monster too human. But he was a beast.

There is no doubt that every massacre that happened, every village that was torched and any woman who was raped all happened because of his personal cruel Master Plan and on his order. History, economy, the activities of other actors in former YU don’t mean a thing. He is guilty of it all and we should not be afraid of saying it aloud just because he has died.

Thank God we woke up in time

Therefore let us all celebrate that the Slovenes, Croats, Bosniaks, Albanians, the EU, the U.S. and everybody else in the international community started comparing notes and recognized – just before it would have been too late – that they were all pawns in Milosevic’ game. They had all been lured into his cobweb of lies, false promises and calculated moves to play their mutually compatible and individually innocent roles in his sadistic drama. Had they not woken up in time, they would all live in Greater Serbia – and so would the rest of us in Europe presumably.

Fortunately, Bill Clinton helped Franjo, last moment, to drive the Serbs out of Croatia. They had to pay that price although they had lived there fore 400 years and defended Europe against the Turks once upon a time. You can’t win them all, as they say! Fortunately we did not give Serb minorities anywhere in YU the support we gave the other minorities – so they ran to Serbia and became refugees with no right to return.

Sanctions on Serbia was only fair. Remember Slobo took steps early that ruined the economy as we have shown above. What a luck that we revealed in time that names like Stupni Do, Merkhala, the Bread Queue Massacre, Srebrenica and Racak etc. was all the work of this sadistic maniac.

The only good thing about him was that his policies permitted us to stand up for principles of human rights, freedom and dignity that we Westerners believe so deeply in. Thus we could bomb in Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo and Serbia proper with good conscience and look back upon everything we did as good and fair and just. Now there is true peace everywhere.

Slobo and his Serbs only got what they deserved: just war. The dream of Greater Serbia became a de facto Smaller Serbia. We were all fooled by him but, thank God and Praise the Prophet, we got it all right before it was too late.

Now he is dead. Serves him right. His death was a little abrupt – presumably part of some new Plan in this monster’s mind. It would perhaps be more fair if he had gotten a lifetime sentence and suffered for years in his cell half dying with inadequate medical assistance. We don’t know and why bother? We did the right thing and got Serbs and Serbia on their knees because they were the last nationalists in our globalizing world, stubborn, backward and self-pitying.

Just a few questions remain to be investigated

There isn’t much more to say. It’s all clear. But I am aware that research is an ongoing process. You have to re-search and challenge even your own assumptions and results. I know I must study much more questions such as these:

  • Why were everybody else in former YU so naïve? Why did they willingly act out the roles he assigned to them, from the Slovenes to the Albanians?
  • How come that so many Westerners were so easy to fool? Why were they so innocent and why did they go along with this monster for so long? Why did ministers, mediators, ambassadors, Contact Group members queue up outside his office or meet him at international conferences year after year?
  • Why on earth did they let him, the man guilty of everything – and they must have known it at some point – sign the Dayton Agreement under the leadership of Richard Holbrooke in 1995?
  • How come one mission after the other was established in Belgrade and Kosovo and why did this Holbrooke – who the day after Milosevic’ death in a CNN interview used Hitler and Mao and Pol Pot and Stalin to describe his evil – do business with him as later as autumn 1998?

I am sure it could not possibly be because they were of the same stock.

The medialised sentence and public opinion based distribution of guilt

Permit me to end this analysis with a few serious and slightly more truthful observations than the above fiction.

Slobodan Milosevic was undoubtedly responsible for much of the suffering, of that I am totally convinced too. But I have a nasty mind. I sense the international so-called community is happy that the final proof of what Slobodan Milosevic was responsible for will never be presented to the world. We’ll never know how big is the difference between the facts and the accusations against him. Leading media already give full throttle to prejudice, biases, propaganda and factual mistakes – no risk of being proven wrong or seen as exaggerating later by a Hague sentence.

At the end of the day, what does it matter? Holbrooke made a surprisingly innovative distinction when interviewed by CNN’s Becky Anderson on March 12, namely the one between the not-so-important legal procedure and sentence in the Hague (that we will never get now) and the judgment or verdict of years by what he called the world public opinion. The truth was, he said, that the latter had already condemned Milosevic and so his death was actually nothing but rough justice.

So we should feel good about the fact that no one any longer respects the principle that a person shall be considered innocent until proven guilty. General public opinion that is based on the media, at least for those who have no personal relation with or can visit the hot spot in question and see for themselves, is enough. War reporters, commercialised media, commentators and selected experts are now the real judges in the – Holbrooken – future.

Exit analysis, complexity, fairness, impartiality and truth-seeking. The truth about the world is constructed and medialised and it serves as the final moral High Judge.

As you will have understood by now, most of this article contains stories, lies and inventions. I could find no other tools to explain at a deeper level what made Milosevic and the Serbs – and only them the architects of Evil in the new medialised court room.

Those who blame exclusively the Serbs and Milosevic for the Balkan tragedy and invoke Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot must base themselves on an analysis fairly close to the invented story I have told above. If not, would they please present their analysis so anyone can judge for themselves the words they freely throw around.

If they don’t, the medialised Justice will continue to be nothing but racism in disguise.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...