The real story: How Milosevic was much more evil than you ever knew # 1

Generic thumbnail

By Jan Oberg, TFF director
Lund, Sweden – March 12-13, 2006

Here at his death, I think CNN, BBC and all the rest paint a much too flattering picture of Slobodan Milosevic. OK, they say that he was the butcher of the Balkans and that he was widely regarded as the architect of the Balkans carnage. CNN points out that he was responsible for 170.000 dead in Croatia, 250.000 in Bosnia, for the misery of today’s Serbia and for the 800.000 refugees running when NATO began bombing Kosovo in early 1999. And, yes, Sweden’s radio listeners were informed about a dozen of times that he started four wars and lost them.

All fine and good and true too, as you will see – but they never explain to us how he actually did it all.

I still think these excellent media people should offer the world some background to this Hitler replica instead of just sounding as if they were sour because he did not grant them the scoop interview they hoped for back then.

I think his death is the right moment to tell you how I believe he, he alone, caused all the troubles. The evil of Milosevic is grossly understated by Western politicians, diplomats and media, even by the millions and millions whose lives he single-handedly ruined. Indeed, there are reasons to believe that he can be tied also to the genocides in Rwanda and Burundi.

I know a bit about it because I met him eye to eye in 1995 and I’ve been in and out of former Yugoslavia some 80 times since 1974 first as a student, then as a conflict analyst and I have served as conflict-mitigator to Milan Panic’s various ministers – Panic and President Cosic were the alternatives to Milosevic in the early 1990s. And, for four year I was a goodwill advisor to another dead President, Dr. Rugova of Kosovo. So, I’ve been a witness. I can no longer keep silent.

Here is what my personal experience and objective research lead me to believe is the well-documented truth about him.

How Milosevic destroyed the YU economy

It was already in the early 1970s, at the age of 30, that Slobo started working on his devilish plan: to destroy old Yugoslavia in order to build a new Greater Serbia. He began working secretly with Western transnational corporations – remember he was trained in financial affairs through his relations with the Rockefeller family and knew how to exploit its network. At his advice they closed down their shipbuilding, textile, military, electronics and car industries in YU and set up shop instead in low-wage countries in Asia. “Destroy the industrial base and everything else will fall,” muttered this sly Marxist Communist to himself. The oil crisis that happened simultaneously was like a God-sent gift; he became director of a gas company in 1973.

Signs of economic crisis soon surfaced and YU ran into debt for the first time. So, while in the U.S., Slobo made friends with people in the IMF and the World Bank who agreed to come over and advise the unsuspecting politicians in YU. Little did they know who Slobo-the-Trickster was and how his inviting these great aid organizations was meant to cause disaster. The IMF and the World Bank ordered immediate privatisation, structural adjustment and they told YU not to have an ethnically balanced National Bank board.

Sooner rather than later, unemployment rose immediately to 40-60 percent here and there; the YU economy went further down the drain, inequality rose, and so did the foreign debt, and people began to see “the others” as the main cause of their deepening daily misery. He masterminded this economic destruction hiding as leader of a Belgrade bank between 1978 and 1983.

Then Tito died, what a chance! Having set in motion the destruction of YU’s economy Slobo now turns to his political destruction. Ruthlessly – what did you expect? – he begins to manipulate Serbia’s Communist Party from 1982.

If you are a nationalist and want a Greater Serbia all over the place, the old thing has to die first and be reborn in a new shape. That’s also how he thought he would become a Saviour and so he builds his plan with good-hearted allies who just don’t see the intrigue and stab-in-the-back drama he is directing. His manoeuvring leads to enormous socio-economic disparities. He knows how to play on the traumas of WW 2 that Tito had swept under the carpet.

How he made the Slovenes and Croats nationalists

Slovenia is just a detail, a stepping stone to invading Croatia. You may have heard that Alois Mock, Austria’s foreign minister, argued his best to get YU divided. That’s not true, of course, it’s just a nasty rumour. In fact he supported the U.S. at the time which argued for YU remaining a unified country. This irritated Slobo so much that he went straight for a military solution. With quite some sadism, he deliberately chose to send a Slovene general from the YU Army, JNA, to simply invade his own country.

No one understood why, because the Slovenes wanted so much to stay in YU. But as my analysis show, Slobo needed to destroy it all to build a new Greater Serbia. So he pretended that the JNA was the Army of all YU and that it’s job was to hold the country together. In reality, he used JNA to split and ravage it, saying one thing and doing the opposite while baselessly accusing Mock and the Slovenes of conspiracy against the State. Well, that invasion was anyhow a nice little tea party so let’s move on.

He calls up his friend Franjo Tudjman in Zagreb and suggests that he declare Croatia independent and begin to import weapons illegally. “You see, Franjo, I know from your participation in the nationalist Croatian Spring in the early 1970s that we can work together,” he argues. “Don’t worry about the Constitution, just go for independence. Use the memory of the old-fashioned Serbs over there and clamp down on them as much as you please. Your Croats will love you for it and it’ll give me a pretext to start a war on behalf of all Serbs. I’ll let you win it later, I promise, but it will make me a hero too that I tried!

This was an offer Tudjman could not refuse. As a typical Western democrat who had no trace of East European authoritarianism – he was a good Catholic too – he loathed any type of nationalism and personality cult. But he had a little weak spot and thought he could go along with it for a short while, much against his principles of course. So he invents a nationalist and semi-fascist rhetoric that scares the hell out of Croatia’s Serbs – and sends his interior minister on a shopping tour to Western arms dealers. Poor Franjo doesn’t see that he is just a pawn in Slobo’s sinister game, of course.

Then he gets the EU to recognise Croatia and Slovenia

Slobo keeps at least part of his promise to Franjo. Always ahead of the rest, he begins to persuade the EU to recognize Croatia and Slovenia before they have the faintest understanding of YU as such or the faintest idea about what to do with the rest of YU. He knew Franjo would love him for it. What he also knew was that that would lead to war in Bosnia. Here is how he did it.

Slobo contacts Germany’s foreign minister, Hans-Dietrich Genscher, and tells him that he ought to spearhead Croatia’s independence in the EU. “We’ll share it without consulting Franjo,” says Slobo the fox. “You get the coast for your German tourists, I make a contiguous Greater Serbia where the Serbs live. Step two, dear Hans-Dietrich, is that you and I know that that move will make life impossible for Alija Izetbegovic, but you don’t like Muslims anyhow, do you? Tudjman is a fool and he will probably try to get control over those parts of Bosnia where Croats live. See – what an arms sales potential for you, other EU countries and the U.S.! And while Tudjman falls into our Bosnian trap, I take Vukovar behind his back and you turn a blind eye; to him half of Bosnia is much more important than Eastern Slavonia. Keine Hexeri and Nema problema!”

Genscher was very interested in that coast, as was his predecessor Klaus Kinkel who, before serving as foreign minister, had headed the West German intelligence service, BND. And Slobo knew how to appeal to the old German-Croatian ties during the 2nd World War. Genscher’s united Germany could need that coast and a divided YU.

Perhaps more important, he hoped that the EU could run this backyard so the Americans didn’t get there. It was time for big thinking now the Soviet Union had fallen apart and Europe – Maastricht Europe – was on the move under what he hoped would be German leadership.

YU didn’t fit, could not be neutral and certainly not orthodox and socialist. It had to be changed and take part in Western globalisation. Good to have at least some of it linked to Germany and the Vatican.

Slobo almost overdid it when he said that “After all, you know, we Serbs and you Germans can work together. But don’t listen to Lord Carrington or to UN’s Butros-Ghali and please don’t listen to your Ambassador here in Belgrade. I know they all tell you not to recognise Slovenia and Croatia. Just don’t listen to them. They are Yugo-nostalgics. Both Serbs and Germans can play a new role in new Europe, can’t you see?

The otherwise most experienced Genscher here met his Waterloo or Sloboloo. He was too good for this eloquent but cunning Balkan dictator and didn’t understand that Slobo only used him too: Start wars here and there, lose some and gain some, play one European against another (France/Britain), and all of Europe against the U.S. – what a strategist he was at a time when Europeans focused on the huge changes under Gorbachev and the fall of the Wall and turned their backs to the Balkans!

Slobo was a Master in teasing and timing. Genscher fell for him. And later he fell also as a Foreign Minister.

So, in that fateful December night in 1991, the EU – totally innocent as it were – carried out Slobo’s plan with the naïve Genscher as its agent. It recognized Croatia and Slovenia and thus served Slobo, on a silver plate, the third war he had already fomented in his sick mind: the war in Bosnia.

PhD, Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer, Professor Emeritus and media commentator

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Read More
TFFPortfolioVign
UNITE-tillid, DREAM-velstand og andre konstruktive komponenter Normally we publish articles in English here. But this is a translation of a very important TFF document that should reach as many as possible in Denmark since this country’s government has been one of the most hardline in Europe and, up till now at least, has refused to use diplomacy and, instead, spent tremendous sums on arming Ukraine with the express goal of defeating Russia. Thus this – unique – article is in Danish. Vi er Johnny Baltzersen og hans Fælles Sikkerhed – Fælles Fremtid på Substack overmåde taknemmelige for at have oversat og publiceret TFF’s 2025-portfølje for fredsidéer med henblik på Ukraines fremtid. Vi håber den nu kan nå mange flere danskere – som også vil sprede den og skabe debat – nu den danske regerings og folketingspartiernes politik på dette område siden 2022 står nu – forudsigeligt – ved vejs ende....
JoGSS-Silent
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
Screenshot 2026-10-26 115647
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Screenshot 2026-10-15 141837
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...