PressInfo #57 – Procitajte civilni deo Sporazuma o Kosovu!

“Procitajte tzv. Sporazum o Kosovu, isti onaj o kom se
upravo ovih sati raspravlja u Parizu i budite sigurni da ce
vas puno toga sto on sadrzi zaista iznenaditi”, kaze Dr. Jan
Oberg, direktor TFF-a. ” Mislim da ni jedna suverena drzava
ne bi prihvatila sve CIVILNE odredbe a tako ni VOJNU
implementaciju predvidenu ovakvim planom. Nijedna drzava
nije odusevljena kad joj prete ultimatumom tipa “potpisi ili
cemo te bombardovati” a pogotovo ne kada takav navodni plan
u sebi de-facto sadrzi i kraj nje same kao suverene drzave
sa vlastitim teritorijalnim integritetom.

Uobicajeni izvestaji CNN-a, BBC-a i vodecih listova
prenose svetskoj javnosti utisak kako su bas Srbi ti koji
tvrdoglavo odugovlace pregovore o miru, dok je Albanska
strana kooperativna, sto se vidi i iz pisma sefa njihove
delegacije od 15. marta. Jugoslaviju treba kazniti dok
Albance treba pohvaliti zbog njihove “hrabrosti da naprave
ustupke kako bi se doslo do mira.” No to je samo lazna
slika, opsena i obmana. Prava slika je kudikamo
komplikovanija od ovoga” kaze Oberg.

“Mora da ste vec primetili kako niko ne postavlja jedno
savim prosto i logicno pitanje: Da li mozda postoji neki
RAZLOG za to sto Srbi kazu ‘ne’ a Albanci nagovestavaju kako
bi mozda mogli reci ‘da’? Zapitajte se zbog cega i mediji i
diplomati analiziraju jedino nacin na koji se vodi igra a ne
analiziraju i njenu sustinu. Da li VI oupste znate” pita Jan
Oberg “da dokument koji je stavljen na sto izmedju ostalog
sadrzi i sledece odredbe:

* samoupravno Kosovo sme da utice na jugoslovensku
politiku dok istovremeno vlastima SRJ nije dozvoljeno da se
mesaju u unutrasnje stvari na Kosovu? Ni SRJ ni Srbija ne
smeju da izmene Ustav ili druge zakone Kosova dok ce u isto
vreme gradjani Kosova i dalje biti birani u Saveznu i
Republicku Skupstinu, u obe vlade i sve sudove;

* Nigde nisu definisane “nacionalne zajednice” –
izraz koji se provlaci kroz citav dokument kao jedna od
njegovih osnovnih kategorija – no svejedno dokument govori o
njihovoj “postenoj zastupljenosti” kao i o njihovim
“dodatnim pravima”.

* (Ovaj) Sporazum nadjacava bilo koji drugi zakonski akt, tj. jugoslovenski zakonski akt?

* Svi ce imati jednaka prava i jednak pristup
javnim sluzbama, no uopste nije objasnjeno niti se vidi kako
ce to pravo ostvarivati 10 – 20 procenata stanovnistva
pokrajine koji NISU Albanci;

* Misija za Implementaciju sporazuma imace svoje vlastite radio i televiziju na Kosovu;

* SRJ ce biti onemogucena da istrazuje zlocine
vezane za ovaj sukob a Sporazum donosi i to da prethodne
politicke ili druge aktivnosti u pokretu otpora nece
predstavljati smetnju za buduce nosioce sluzbenih ovlascenja
na Kosovu;

* Svi organi vlasti u SRJ ce biti duzni da provedu sve odluke koje donese Vrhovni Sud Kosova;

* Dozvoljena je promena opstinskih i komunalnih
granica – sto kao verovatnu posledicu moze da izazove razne
manipulacije oko izbornih jedinica sa ciljem da se stvore
kompaktne jedinice sa sigurnom vecinom;

* OEBS ce nadgledati izbore uz konsultacije sa svim stranama; SRJ se ne smatra sposobnom da sama organizuje izbore;

* ef OEBS-ove i EU Misije za implementaciju (CIM)
ce biti ovlascen da svim stranama uputi obavezujuce
direktive po vlastitom nahodjenju i u vezi bilo cega za sta
sam zakljuci da je potrebno; isto kao i u Bosni, i ovde ce
on biti ovlascen da otpusti osoblje sluzbe javne bezbednosti
ili da sam smeni ili postavi javne sluzbenike i da pritom
zaobidje ili preskoci postojece institucije – sto znaci da
moze da ponisti i rezultate izbora; mogucnost da SRJ moze da
stavi veto na bilo koju odluku jednostavno nije
predvidjena;

* Kosovo ce se organizovati kao slobodna trzisna privreda, kako je i predvidjeno u njegovom “ustavu”;

* SRJ ce ustupiti Kosovu ravnopravan udeo u
prihodima od svih medjunarodnih transakcija dok ce privredni
potencijal i prihodi same pokrajine biti prerasporedjeni
prema “rasporedu ovlascenja i odgovornosti predvidjenih ovim
Sporazumom.” Tesko je reci da ovo pojasnjava sta ce se
uraditi sa znacajnim prirodnim bogatstvima i industrijskim
postrojenjima u pokrajini;

* Obecana je i znacajna privredna pomoc i
odrzavanje donatorske konferencije. Ni pomena nema o bilo
kakvoj pomoci kojom bi se normalizovalo stanje u
jugoslovenskoj privredi, ukinule joj se sankcije ili na bilo
koji drugi nacin pomoglo 650.000 izbeglica koji se nalaze u
SRJ, najveci broj u bilo kojoj pojedinacnoj zemlji
Evrope;

* Za tri godine ce se sazvati medjunarodni
sastanak na kom ce se “utvrditi mehanizmi za konacno resenje
za Kosovo, na osnovu narodne volje, misljenja odgovarajucih
organa” itd. Ne govori se nista o tome ko ce sazvati taj
sastanak, Kontakt grupa se do tada moze promeniti ili
raspasti ili je moze zameniti neko drugo telo. Zasto se ne
koristi rec “referendum”? Ukoliko je istina da su 85%
stanovnika Kosova Albanci, nije tesko pogoditi da narodna
volja u stvari znaci nezavisno Kosovo. Jasno je da i Srbi na
Kosovu a i oni u SRJ to znaju dok sam dokument to precutkuje
dok na pr. istovremeno ne predvidja nikakve odredbe po
kojima se eventualno nezavisno Kosovo ne bi smelo ujediniti
sa Albanijom.

* Na samom kraju, u ovom, civilnom delu dokumenta
potpuno nedostaje bilo kakav spomen gradjanskog
obezbedjivanja mira, mera za uspostavljanje poverenja,
pomirenja na osnovama gradjanskog drustva, radionica o
razresavanju sukoba, podrske nevladinim organizacijama,
obucavanja, treninga za mir i zastitu ljudskih prava, itd.
Na taj nacin sanse da ce kroz ove tri godine Albanci, Srbi i
ostali gradjani zaista poceti da izgradjuju medjusobno
poverenje i da uce kako da miroljubivo zive jedni pored
drugih, ostaju ravne nuli.

Ovaj tekst krije dve vrste semantickih varki: Prva je ta
sto se u njemu Jugoslavija, jedna suverena i priznata drzava
kroz jezik kojim je pisan i kroz odredbe koje on sadrzi
tretira na potpuno istoj ravni sa albanskom
samo-proglasenom, nepriznatom drzavom Kosovo i sa njenim
vojnim jedinicama, Oslobodilackom vojskom Kosova, OVK. Kako
bilo da bilo, to je ipak pravni dokument i kao takav navodi
da se 70-80 procenata u njemu izlozenih odredbi odnosi na
SRJ a ne i na Kosovo, jer – boze moj- samo prvo-pomenuta ima
sve institucije, pravna sredstva i snagu potrebnu da ovaj
sporazum i sprovede. Tako kada se na mnogo mesta u Sporazumu
procita “Strane se obavezuju” to se u stvari odnosi samo na
SRJ.

Drugi trik je taj sto dokument ponavlja na puno mesta
kako se “postuju suverenitet i integritet Jugoslavije” dok
se istovremeno uveliko mesa i u jedno i u drugo i to na dva
izrazena nacina: a) uspostavljanjem ocigledno asimetricnog
rasporeda medjusobnih mogucnosti uticanja i obaveza izmedju
SRJ i samo-upravnog Kosova i b) postavljanjem efa civilnog
dela Misije za implementaciju, CIM, za de-facto vladara
pokrajine, a prema modelu iz Dejtonskog Sporazuma i po
ugledu na tako nastali tamosnji Ured visokog
predstavnika.

Dokument je svima na uvidu i dostupan je preko Interneta.
Kako to da niko jos nije analizirao ove stvari? Kako to da
se nije pokrenula strucna debata o tome koliko ovo jeste ili
nije posten sporazum koji ce dovesti do uspostave mira i
poverenja? Zbog cega je sva paznja javnosti usmerena na samu
igru pa niko ne (zeli da) vidi koja su tu ona prava i
sustinska pitanja i problemi? Ovo nije neki obican sportski
dogadjaj! Ovde su u igri sudbine oko 10 miliona ljudi i
njihovih buducih pokolenja.

Po svemu sto ja vidim, NIJEDNA zapadna drzava – a sigurno
ne ni jedna od clanica Kontakt grupe, ne bi cak ni pomislila
da odobri neku samoupravu kao sto je ova ovde zacrtana, a na
koju bi je prisiljavali vojnim pretnjama i sporazumom o
vojnoj implementaciji” kaze dr. Oberg, koji je sa TFF
pregovarackim timom aktivno prisutan u ovom konfliktnom
regionu jos od 1992. U svom zakljucku on jos kaze i ovo:

“Poglavlje 7, Vojna Implementacija Sporazuma, jos je
najinteresantnije. Zadovoljni smo sto cemo vam u sledecoj
Press Informaciji moci prikazati i ovaj deo Sporazuma. Jeste
li znali da se u citavom tekstu Sporazuma nigde ne spominje
rec OVK? Da Sporazum predvidja da NATO treba da postane
najvisi vojni autoritet na tom delu teritorije suverene
Jugoslavije? Da se Jugoslaviji sprecava da sama definise
odbranu vlastitih granica a da se nigde u Sporazumu ne
definise demilitarizacija OVK? No, o tome vise u TFF Press
Info 58…”

Go to http://www.transnational.org, “Highlight”
or “Links” to find the
Kosovo Interim Agreement!

© TFF 1999

• You are welcome to re-print, copy, archive, quote
from or re-post this item, but please retain the source.

• TFF’s website has all the relevant links to Iraq,
the Balkans, including media there + peace research, and
non-violence

• Teacher, activist, journalist?? You’ll always find
something interesting at TFF.

• Get your daily global news from the leading media
on TFF’s site, all in one place.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Read More
Screenshot 2026-10-26 115647
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Screenshot 2026-10-15 141837
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
images-2
Advocates of nuclear disarmament are regularly dismissed by the champions of nuclear deterrence as naïve and unrealistic, utopian or even irresponsible. Yet this ‘doctrine’ of deterrence, regarded by France as the ‘cornerstone’ of its national security, is based on quasi-religious beliefs, a theory that cannot be proven, risky gambles and fragile assumptions. So much so that one might legitimately ask which side the ‘Care Bears’ are on. Marc FinaudVice-President of Initiatives for Nuclear Disarmament (IDN) October 9, 2026 This article was originally published on Pressenza When it comes to these things being treated as religious concepts, look here. Idealists and realists It was Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand’s former Foreign Minister, who repeatedly coined the phrase: ‘Europeans are a sort of Care Bears who don’t realise they’re living in Jurassic Park’. He applies this reference to the cartoon for well-behaved children not only to what he regards as weakness or idealism...