PressInfo #64 – The West is in Moral Trouble if there is an Ethnic Cleansing Plan – and if there isn’t

Documents show that NATO ignored risks

Delivered-To: tff@transnational.live

From: “stevan babic” <batabab@ntscan.com>

Subject: Translation to Serbian of PI # 634

Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 18:25:43 +0200

MIME-Version: 1.0

X-Priority: 3

X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3

X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: tff@transnational.live

X-Return-Path: batabab@ntscan.com

Dear Jan,    with a small delay, please find bellow the translation to Serbian of your PI # 64.   Best regards   Stevan   ******************************************************************  

Ukoliko postoji plan o etnickom ciscenju onda je Zapad u moralnoj krizi,

– a pogotovo ako ne postoji    Dokumenti pokazuju da se NATO nije obazirao na upozorenja   TFF Press Info # 64   “Rekli su nam kako je predsednik Milosevic jos prosle jeseni imao razradjen plan da etnicki ocisti pokrajinu Kosovo od Albanaca. Medjutim dok je neosporna cinjenica da su jugoslovenske snage zloupotrebile NATO-ovu kampanju bombardovanja za proterivanje Albanaca na takav nacin i u tako velikom broju da to zasluzuje svaku moralnu osudu, nedokazana optuzba da je za to postojao unapred pripremljen plan vise govori o NATO-u nego o predsedniku Milosevicu. A ono sto nam ta cinjenica govori, NATO-u ni najmanje ne sluzi na cast,” kaze direktor TFF-a, Jan Oberg.   “Odvratno proterivanje Albanaca s Kosova se nicim ne moze opravdati. Jugoslovenske vlasti koje to sprovode ili dopustaju drugima da to sprovode, nicim pa ni NATO-ovim bombardovanjem ne mogu opravdati takvo i toliko krsenje ljudskih prava. Istina je da ce Jugosloveni  u NATO-ovom  razvaljivanju Jugoslavije prepoznati “narudzbu” Kosovara- Albanaca/OVK, ali zbog toga je Jugoslavija trebala silom da se odupre NATO-u a ne da se sveti na neduznim civilima.   Sad kad smo vec sve ovo rekli da kazemo jos i sledece: Ni NATO-u ni Zapadu se niposto ne sme zdravo za gotovo poverovati kad pokusavaju da svoju balkansku bombardersku brljotinu opravdaju navodnim “dokazima” koje tvrde da imaju o planu za etnicko ciscenje a da nam pri tom nisu predocili ni  najmanji dokaz o tome. Evo nekoliko razloga zasto je to potpuno neodgovorno i zasto se time potkopavaju i NATO-ova vlastita uverljivost i uverljivost slobodnih novinara koji jednostavno NE PITAJU ona kljucna, kriticna pitanja.   Prvo i osnovno, do trenutka dok NATO-ove bombe nisu pocele da padaju nismo nikada nikoga culi da je i jednu jedinu rec rekao o takvom planu.   Drugo, razlog za bombardovanje je nadjen u odbijanju Jugoslavije da potpise diktat iz Rambujea. Uopste nismo nikoga culi da je ikada izgovorio kako ce Jugoslaviju bombardovati ako samo pokusa da sprovede plan o etnickom ciscenju.   Trece, ukoliko je istina da su za taj plan znali jos jesenas, kako je Zapad sebi uopste dozvolio da u Pariz pozove predstavnike tako ubilackog rezima? Kako su SAD mogle da sebi dozvole da posalju ambasadora Holbruka u Beograd ne bi li u zadnjem minutu ipak sklopio dil sa takvim “serijskim etnickim cistacem?”   Cetvrto i verovatno od svega i najgore – ako je Zapad za takav plan znao zasto onda nije uradio APSOLUTNO NISTA da se planski pripremi i pomogne da se ublazi humanitarna kriza za koju se moralo znati da bi je takav plan neminovno proizveo? Zasto se Beogradu vec tad nije aktivno pripretilo da bi se nesreca sprecila ILI zbog cega bombardovanje nije pocelo jos ranije? Zar ne mislite da je potpuno nemoralno znati za postojanje takvog plana a ne preduzeti apsolutno nista u vezi s njim?   Peto, ako su Milosevic, Srbija i Jugoslavija hteli da se oslobode Albanaca zasto su za tu rabotu odabrali tako nepovoljan moment, dok su OEBS-ovi verifikatori krstarili uzduz i popreko pokrajine, i kad su svojim ocima i usima pokrili citav taj region? (Da vas samo podsetim, Jugoslavija je ukinula prethodni mandata OEBS-a jos 1992. kao uzvratnu meru na odluku OEBS-a da suspenduje clanstvo Jugoslavije.) Zasto je Jugoslavija dopustala da lider kosovskih Albanaca, dr. Rugova i njegovi sledbenici odrze paralelne izbore, uspostave vladu, bez ometanja putuju po zemlji i u inostranstvo i da uspostavljaju paralelene drzavne ustanove? Zasto je id 1993. na ovamo dozvolila da OVK naraste do te mere da je prosle godine bila u stanju da drzi 30% jugoslovenske teritorije? Sve ovo je, da je htela, mogla daleko ranije da spreci.   Sesto, kako to da ni OEBS ni bilo koja od brojnih humanitranih organizacija koje su bile na Kosovu nije upozorila svet da se jedan tako neverovatan, tako veliki i nehuman plan priprema i da ce biti sproveden?   Sedmo, ukoliko su NATO i obavestajne sluzbe vodecih NATO clanica koje su vec bile prisutne u regionu, sve vreme znale za postojanje takvog plana, a pogotovo posle oktobra 98. kad je super-pregovarac SAD-a, Ricard Holbruk, napravio dil sa Milosevicem – zbog cega onda NATO nije svoje bombaske napade bolje ili drugacije isplanirao? Diplomatskim jezikom receno, ta kampanja deluje dosta zbunjeno i lose isplanirano.   Verujem da nam NATO lideri duguju barem nekoliko dobrih odgovora na navedenih sedam pitanja. Potpuno suprotno,” kaze dr. Oberg, “postoje dokazi da su SAD i NATO dobro znali kakav ce haos izazvati bombardovanjem. Mi smo o tome zabelezili sledece cinjenice:   Dokaz # 1, Makedonija i OEBS upozoravali su jos u julu 98.   Na Ohridskom jezeru u Makedoniji (BJRM) Severno-Atlanski Savet (parlamentarci zemalja clanica NATO-a) je odrzao seminar “Bezbednost u jugoistocnoj Evropi” od 4. do 6. jula 1998. Za to vreme je vec besneo rat izmedju OVK/UCK i srpsko/jugoslovenskih snaga a manevri NATO vazduhoplovstva “Odlucni soko” su bili izvedeni u junu. Izvestaj [AR202. SEM 98 7] koji je objavljen februara ove godine sadrzi i sledece zanimljive informacije:   Ucesnici su diskutovali o tome kako da se zaustave borbe na Kosovu; stav NATO-a se “iskristalisao” jos u junu 98. i ministri odbrane zemalja clanica su odrzali sastanak 10. i 11. juna s namerom da daju savet Vojnom komitetu da razmotri nacine kako mogu da se upotrebe brojne vojne mogucnosti koje im stoje na raspolaganju a s ciljem da se (a) zaustavi nasilje, (b) iskljuce iz borbe jugoslovenske snage i (c) osiguraju pregovori.   Zamenik sefa misije OEBS-a u Skoplju, g. Dzulijan Pil Jeits, na tom seminaru je izrazio misljenje da su junski manevri nad Makedonijom izazvali kod Makedonaca suprotstavljena osecanja i utiske. Uglavnom su ih shvatili kao ohrabrenje OVK-u a to je doprinelo jos izrazenijoj podeli stanovnistva prema nacionalnosti. Stavise, to bi dalje citavu zemlju moglo “izvesti na kurs sukobljavanja s Jugoslavijom.” “G. Blagoje Handzijski, makedonski Ministar inostranih poslova, takodje je okazao na takvu opasnost.” Dalje se u tekstu kaze: “g. Aleksandros Papadogonas (Grcka) je primetio da bi eventualna vojna intervencija mogla proizvesti “etnicko ciscenje Srba a time bi se uspostavio opasan presedan. Dzulijan Jeits je takodje upozorio na opasnosti koje prete ukoliko se ne odoli iskusenju da se upotrebom sile ispuni nastali politicki vakuum.” A “predstavnici regiona su jednoglasno zahtevali da budu ukljuceni u sve ubrzane konsultacije pre preuzimanja bilo kakvih operacija.”   Ono sto iz ovoga vidimo” kaze direktor TFF-a “je jasan dokaz da su i prestavnici vlada regiona a i OEBS-a upozoravali parlamentarce NATO-a i to jos u junu 98. o tome da postoje i odredjeni rizici koje bi eventualna NATO-ova vojna akcija nuzno izazvala: destabilizacija Makedonije, makedonsko-jugoslovenski sukob i etnicko ciscenje. Sve to dogodilo se mesecima pre nego sto je NATO poceo da razmatra razlicite opcije.   Dokaz # 2 General Selton je upozoravao da ce se etnicko ciscenje pojacati   28. marta je Sandi Tajms u izvestaju “NATO napada” rekao i da su 15. marta Klinton i clanovi njegovog kabineta medju kojima su bili i Vilijem Koen, Ministar odbrane, i Sendi Berger, Savetnik za nacionalnu bezbednost, sedeli u tisini dok je Selton (general Hju Selton, predsednik zdruzenog staba nacelnika stabova) objasnjavao sta im govore rezultati analiza. Rekao im je da postoji opasnost da ce se, suprotno od namere da se obuzda divljastvo Srba na Kosovu – sto je bio moralni imperativ koji je izlozio predsednik – vazdusnim udarima samo izazvati srpske vojnike da pocine jos vece krvoprolice. Vazdusni udari sami za sebe, rekao je, nece spreciti Srbe da pobiju Kosovare.” Dakle, i americka vojna ekspertiza najviseg ranga upozorila je da vojna akcija moze dovesti do “krvoprolica” a da samo vazdusni udari nece biti dovoljni da to sprece.   Dokaz # 3 Predsednik Klinton se bavio aferom Levinski   Pored toga, Njujork Tajms od 18. aprila i Tajms od 19. aprila saopstili su svojim citaocima da predsednik Klinton nije ucestvovao u pravljenju planova za rat: “Njegovu paznju je odvukao skandal Levinski, predsednik Klinton nije cak ni prisustvovao sastanku u januaru kad je uoblicen plan da se upotrebi pretnja vazdusnim udarima da bi se od Srba iznudilo da prihvate mirovni ugovor za Kosovo koji su trebale da sprovedu kopnene trupe NATO-a. Sastanak u Beloj kuci od 19. januara, na kojem je Medlin Olbrajt, Drzavni sekretar, uspela da se izbori za zauzimanje mnogo tvrdjeg stava protiv Berograda bio je odlucujuci momenat na putu u rat. g. Klinton je bio zauzet postupkom za njegov impicment, a o tome je javio jucerasnji Njujork Tajms uz karikaturu na kojoj se vidi kako je Predsednikova paznja usredsredjena na nesto drugo u trenutku u kom Kosovo eksplodira. Na januarskom sastanku je g-dja Olbrajt uspela da prevlada rezervisanost drugih visih savetnika i zacrtala je plan kojim bi se od Srba po prvi put zahtevalo da pod pretnjom sile pristanu na prisustvo NATO trupa na Kosovu. Plan je kasnije poslan na odobravanje predsedniku Klintonu koji je tog trenutka bio zauzet pisanjem Izvestaja o stanju drzave i nacije a u vreme dok je Senat SAD-a preslusavao argumente da li da ga izbace iz Ovalnog ureda.”   Jan Oberg komentarise: “Imajuci u vidu ovakvu pozadinu dogadjaja te uvidevsi svu groznicavu retoriku i neuspeh bombardovanja po sopstvenim kriterijumima – da stvori mir u Evropi, da spreci humanitarnu katastrofu i da prisili Beograd da prihvati sve zahteve Zapada – covek biva prinudjen da poveruje kako su, ipak, citavu ovu katastrofu kojoj smo svedoci ovih dana PROUZROKOVALI vodeci ljudi, oni koji odlucuju, jer se nisu obazirali na blagovremena upozorenja i iz regiona i od vlastitih vrhunskih vojnih eksperata, zato sto je predsednikova paznja bila “na drugom mestu” i zbog losih procena i bezobraznog podcenjivanja slozenosti problema o kojima se odlucivalo a i o visini uloga koji su igri. Ili, ako hocete, zbog opasne kombinacije samouverenosti i ljudske gluposti, prevelike vojne moci u kombinaciji s nedovoljnom intelektualnom moci.   Dogod nam se ne pokaze empirijski dokaz da je zaista postojao veliki jugoslovenski plan o etnickom ciscenju i dogod nam predsednik Klinton, Drzavni sekretar Olbrajt, Premijer Toni Bler, Ministar inostranih poslova Joska Fiser i danski Premijer Pol Nirup Rasmusen, Glasnogovornik Stejt departmenta Dzejms Rubin i glasnogovornik NATO-a Dzejmi Sej ne pruze bar nekoliko dobrih odgovora na pitanje zbog cega je NATO ipak odlucio da deluje i pored gore pomenutih upozorenja i ociglednih rizika – nemamo nimalo razloga da verujemo ono sto nam govore.   Navedeni plan verovatno postoji jedino u propagandnim odelenjima po prestonicama NATO zemalja. Novinari koji tragaju za istinom moraju njih da bombarduju pitanjima o ovome. Zasto? Zato sto ovakva NATO-ova humanitarna misija koju treba objasnjavati i njenu legitimnost graditi na ovako labavim i nesigurnim cinjenicama i moralno sumnjivim osnovama i treba da nas duboko zabrine. A dosla je posle varke kojom je Diktat iz Rambujea prozvan “mirovni plan.”   Secam se necega sto je Zorz Brak jednom rekao: Istina uvek postoji, jedino njoj suprotnu laz uvek treba ponovo izmisliti.”      

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...