PressInfo #193 – PressInfo 193 Give Burundi’s Peace a Chance

A donors’ conference, co-sponsered by the Burundian government, the Belgian government and UNDP will be held in Brussels January 12-13, 2004. This PressInfo offers a perspective on its urgency. See also TFF’s new Burundi Forum.


Imagine for a moment that politics is about goodness and generosity. Where could a few million dollars of government aid and a few civil society organisations – guaranteed – win the hearts of extremely poor millions who want peace and already work hard to achieve it after 10 years of war and genocide?

The answer is Burundi, the heart-shaped country in the heart of Africa. Burundi makes a good story from Africa. But what does the world know about Burundi, its problems and struggles?

Burundi’s tough reality

Here are the basic facts. Burundi’s population is about 7 million and it is number 171 out of the 175 countries on the UNDP’s human development index. Their life expectancy is 41 years. 69 per cent of its people are under-nourished. It has 290,000 internally displaced citizens and there are about 800,000 Burundian refugees outside of the country waiting to get home. The GNP per capita is US $145. While half of the people are illiterate, 50 per cent of primary school kids don’t have access to schools and those who have lack some 80-100 per cent of the textbooks needed.

There is one (1) doctor per 100,000 citizens and one single psychiatrist in the whole country. The health system has collapsed and 70 per cent of its hospital beds are occupied by AIDS patients. 40,000 die annually because of AIDS; that is13 times the victims of September 11. There are a quarter of a million AIDS orphans in the country. So, humanists of the world, Burundi is your best choice this year!

There is extreme poverty, rampant emotional, social and sexual violence; there is increasing corruption. There is an extremely unequal distribution of wealth and power. The infrastructure is virtually non-existent; travelling to certain provinces requires special security; there is no railway and the country does not have any national museum. And, yes, there is still some fighting because a rebel movement, said to number less than 1,000 soldiers-cum-looters, refuses to join the peace process. Burundi last hit the front pages in July 2003 when these rebels managed to launch an attack on the capital, Bujumbura, in the so-called Tutsi-Hutu ethnic conflict. It is far from only an ethnic conflict – if at all – but that’s the generalised interpretation by people who are more interested in violence and war than in the underlying conflicts.

The good story – wanting peace

So much for the sad facts about Burundi. Fortunately, there is a much better story to tell from this former “Oasis of Peace” in Africa: it could become such an oasis again. The good news is that, with the exception of the mentioned few rebel fighters, all parties are now inside the framework of the Arusha Peace and Reconciliation Agreement and they all participate in the peace process, the second-last rebel movement joining in August 2003.

Burundi is one of few countries in the world that has a minister for peace and reconciliation, and a minister for human rights and good governance, the latter a former rebel leader. There is an African peace-monitoring mission that works. Any visitor who meets politicians and intellectuals will find out that there is a surprising number of open-minded, simply good-hearted, women and men who have both good visions and good will.

Irrespective of all this, the peace process will invariably fail without an international community – EU countries in particular – that shows similar qualities: good hearts, vision and the will to do something. Burundi does not have diamonds or oil – perhaps a good thing so it won’t be the object of some “humanitarian” intervention – but it has a good climate, excellent natural conditions for feeding its people and, being exceptionally beautiful, an indisputable potential for tourism.

Most important of all, the people are now completely exhausted – neither Hutus (84 percent) nor Tutsis (15 per cent) nor Twas (1 per cent) want one day more of fighting. That is a marked difference from when I visited Burundi four years ago. The Burundians have learned the hard way that war, genocide and other violence only brought grief and devastation on everybody except for a few corrupted politicians and looters (who, as usual, also got rich here through ill-conceived international sanctions hitting only the wrong people). Few people could work with deeper conviction for peace and development after the hell on earth they have gone through.

How to survive 2004 and beyond?

So, what are the immediate challenges in 2004? There is demobilisation and a military that will have to find civilian jobs. During the war years, the army swelled to perhaps 60,000 soldiers; it has to transform into a unified military of maximum 20,000. It desperately needs to secure that demobilised soldiers, returning refugees and the rest of the people have something to eat, something to do, schools to send their kids to and somewhere to get medical treatment.

In 11 months from now, the present transitional government and parliament shall be replaced by new ones through elections. I ask how on earth they will be able to carry through fair, honest and reliable elections on top of all the other problems and without a census and election law. Top level politicians tell me that the country simply must, that it is stipulated in the Arusha Agreement and that even bad elections are better than none.

Another huge issue is that of reconciliation and trust-building. Some tell me that the country should establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission like that in South Africa. Some tell me that Burundi is different and special and that such a process could do more harm than good. Also, there were simply too many who committed crimes to be given legal processes in court rooms – not to mention that the legal system itself is in ruins. Thus, the only thing that is likely to work constructively seems to be informal, everyday people-to-people, municipality-to-municipality reconciliation and forgiveness.

I met many peace heroes in Burundi. There are excellent, visionary intellectuals; there are devoted, hard-working NGOs; there is an emerging civil society gaining strength and trying with inhumanly small resources to anchor and solidify the elite and the party system’s peace agreement among the millions of destitute. It is common knowledge that this peace agreement leaves very much to be desired. And it is common recognition that there is no faster or better road to the future.

Can the madness return? Where to turn when you want peace aid?

But I am afraid that, if we don’t assist Burundi now, many will be so frustrated that they will likely return to the mountains and resume their fighting and their genocidal policies. That does not have to happen.

If a new genocide happens, you will hear about it. But you won’t hear that we – the “international community” – caused it by not doing what easily could be done. Such is the angle on Africa. It is not fair, it is not objective journalism, and it certainly does not increase the willingness of governments and development agencies to get involved when time is ripe. And the time is ripe now! Not helping Burundi through 2004 could be a recipe for a new hell in Africa.

When countries have natural resources we want or when extremist groups inside a country take to violent methods, various groups in the international community stand ready to provide arms, ammunition, mercenaries, propaganda and media attention. But to whom can countries turn for empathy, assistance and compassion when they struggle to get out of war and maldevelopment? Where shall they turn to obtain peace assistance on their own terms?

Get the priorities right and help make Burundi an Oasis of Peace

Here is an African country that ought to hit our headlines for its struggle towards development and peace. What human folly and what wrong priorities in our world that powerful countries in Europe and the US itself try to create impossible peace where they are not wanted and ignore the places where peace is perfectly possible! The Bush administration spends US $1 billion a week in Iraq without, it seems, winning the hearts of the 24 million Iraqis.

The fact is that it would be very cheap to help Burundi. The UN Consolidated Appeals Process, CAP, calls for US $72 million to meet the immediate humanitarian needs for 2004. The country has an accumulated debt of US $1.2 billion. In global terms, this is peanuts! Of course, true development over the next decade would require much more aid and investment. But the first precondition is that people survive and kids get to school. They will if we help them.

Let’s reward the Burundians because they turned to peace, give them that humanitarian assistance and cancel that debt in full. That would be conflict-management, violence prevention and humanitarianism in one. It would show others that peace pays.

Here is a good story in the making! This is the place where you can win 7 million hearts. This is where people and governments who are serious about their wish to see a better world have a golden opportunity. Let’s work with the Burundians to re-create their desired Oasis of Peace!

© TFF 2004

Related Posts

Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
Read More
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
images-2
Advocates of nuclear disarmament are regularly dismissed by the champions of nuclear deterrence as naïve and unrealistic, utopian or even irresponsible. Yet this ‘doctrine’ of deterrence, regarded by France as the ‘cornerstone’ of its national security, is based on quasi-religious beliefs, a theory that cannot be proven, risky gambles and fragile assumptions. So much so that one might legitimately ask which side the ‘Care Bears’ are on. Marc FinaudVice-President of Initiatives for Nuclear Disarmament (IDN) October 9, 2026 This article was originally published on Pressenza When it comes to these things being treated as religious concepts, look here. Idealists and realists It was Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand’s former Foreign Minister, who repeatedly coined the phrase: ‘Europeans are a sort of Care Bears who don’t realise they’re living in Jurassic Park’. He applies this reference to the cartoon for well-behaved children not only to what he regards as weakness or idealism...
8824b09f-33a5-43f9-9fd0-550f28cda24d_1536x1024
What the West Borrowed from Asia and What It Left Behind Jan Krikke October 8, 2026 The article was originally published here In the late 1960s, the musical Hair announced that the Age of Aquarius was dawning. Its opening anthem promised a transformation of human consciousness: an era of peace, harmony and understanding. Half a century later, a familiar echo of that promise is a meditation app offered by your employer. You can find it in the same list of benefits as the pension plan and the gym discount. How did a spiritual revolution become an employee benefit? The answer lies in the history of the movement known as New Age: where it came from, what it borrowed from Asia, and why the meaning of what it borrowed changed in the process. Two definitions will help. New Age is a loose label for a wide range of spiritual practices and...
Screenshot 2026-10-04 210142
Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....