One year after the fall of Baghdad: how healthy is Iraq?

REPORT

of Medical Aid for the Third World, Belgium

28 April 2004

based on a fact-finding mission to Iraq, March 2004

Contact: Medical Aid for the Third World, Belgium, info@g3w.be, tel. +32/2 209.23.60 geert.van.moorter@skynet.be, tel. +32/486 79.37.98

May 18, 2004

Dr. Geert Van Moorter was already in Iraq on various missions for the Belgian non-governmental organization Medical Aid for the Third World, in April 2002; before, during and after the war in March/April 2003; in July/August 2003; and in March 2004. He made, together with Iraqi doctors and health workers, a random survey on the health situation and the health care infrastructure in Iraq, after one year of occupation. He visited hospitals and clinics in Baghdad and Basra. On a health conference in Basra, he was able to talk to colleagues from all over the country. He had contacts with Unicef, the World Health Organization, the new Ministry of Health and with several war victims of last year.

Dr. Van Moorter is specialized in emergency medicine and tropical diseases. He made a study and published on child mortality and has experience in public health and post traumatic stress disorder.

Summary:

Evidence that child mortality is on the rise

The purchasing power, the food situation and the living conditions of the majority of the population have all deteriorated. Half of the active population has no job and no income. The prices of basic necessities, food and transportation have doubled or tripled. The quality of the drinking water is not being controlled, the sewage system of Baghdad has been damaged by the bombings, there is no regular garbage collection. Iraq has become one big garbage belt. All these indicators put together point towards a rising child mortality, a fact being acknowledged by the WHO representative for Iraq. It also brings Unicef to the conclusion that child mortality will probably increase further.

Medical infrastructure and medicines: no improvement

The medical infrastructure and the medical material were already outdated and malfunctioning as a result of the twelve years’ embargo. One year after the onset of the war, these have not yet been renewed. War victims and other patients do not receive optimal treatment. Complicated operations cannot be performed. Everything is lacking, including medicines for acute as well as chronic ailments. This results in deteriorating conditions or even the death of patients, and in extra handicaps for the wounded. On March 17, right after the explosion at the Mount Lebanon Hotel in Baghdad, we helped care for victims in the Ibn Al Nafis hospital. We observed there that there were no disposable gloves, no appropriate intravenous fluid to treat shock, to ultrasound, no well-functioning monitors,…

Findings:

1. Testifying about the situation in the hospitals is made difficult.

2. The purchasing power, the food situation and the living conditions have deteriorated. An increase in child mortality is to be expected.

3. Insecurity creates psychological traumas.

4. Access to health care is severely limited.

5. The hospital infrastructure has not improved over the past year.

6. Medicines and medical material are lacking.

7. Depleted Uranium (DU): the population is not informed nor protected.

8. The plans of the CPA and the Ministry of Health are no solution.

9. Appendix: April 2004: US-led troops in Iraq are targeting hospitals, ambulances and civilians.

1. Testifying about the situation in the hospitals is made difficult.

Access to hospitals is very limited, the press is hardly allowed to enter. It was only with difficulty and through personal contacts with medical doctors that we could enter several hospitals. Doctors who dare to testify before the camera are intimidated and put under pressure. We talked to two doctors who had given an interview. Afterwards, someone from the Ministry of Health visited them. They were forced to sign a letter stating that they wouldn’t give any interviews anymore, or else that they would lose their job in the hospital.

2. The purchasing power, the food situation and the living conditions have deteriorated. An increase in child mortality is to be expected.

According to the CPA (Coalition Provisional Authority, the US administration led by Paul Bremer), 35% of the active population is jobless. Other sources speak of 60 to 70%.

During the embargo, several foodstuffs were distributed for free among the population; it concerns dry goods such as rice, tea, beans, sugar, wheat, milk powder, oil, salt and things such as washing powder and soap. This distribution is being continued, but regularly some goods are lacking. E.g. in March, there was no rice. As a consequence, everybody was forced to buy rice on the free market, which pushed prices up. And anyhow, the food that is not contained in the food basket – vegetables, fruits, meat, fish, cheese, eggs,… – has to be bought on the market. Their prices have increased two- or threefold over the past year.

The majority of the population has less cash available, while the cost of living has increased. The purchasing power has diminished, access to food is less assured. Many families depend entirely on the food basket. Unicef notes that malnutrition today is higher than after the first Gulf War of 1991, and the number of children with acute malnutrition rose sharply in the first months after the onset of the 2003 war.

The provision of electricity in Baghdad has deteriorated. Water services are still in worse condition than before the war, and nobody knows the quality of the drinking water. In some places there is still no water coming out of the faucet.

The sewage system was already in precarious condition before the war. It has been hit by the bombings and hasn’t been repaired ever since. In many poor quarters of Baghdad, dirty water is standing in the streets. Garbage collection is not yet well organized. Garbage is all around the place.

The three main factors that influence child mortality (under five mortality) at the level of the family are the purchasing power, the food situation and the living conditions. All three of them have deteriorated over the past year in Iraq. The local Unicef representative confirmed that child mortality will probably increase further.

3. Insecurity creates psychological traumas.

According to the director of the psychiatric centre in Baghdad, lots of children are faced with serious emotional and behavioural problems as a direct result of the war, the fear, the hate, the occupation. This is what is called Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Symptoms of this are bedwetting, aggressive behaviour (verbal and physical), sleeping and eating disorders, depression, fear, nightmares, concentration and memory disorders, auto-mutilation, developmental disorders and phobias.

Repeated exposure to war dead and wounded has resulted in widespread emotional and psychological traumas among medical emergency teams of doctors and nurses.

Together with the bad economic situation, the insecurity is today’s major problem, causing quite some psychosomatic disorders. There is insecurity because of the presence of the occupation troops. And there is the problem of the inefficiency of the police, which has led to an increase in criminality.

4. Access to health care is severely limited.

The problems with the telephone networks make it difficult to impossible to call an ambulance. Because of the insecurity, patients as well as doctors don’t dare go to the hospital at night. We experienced ourselves how, after a major car accident, an unconscious patient could not be brought to the hospital in an ambulance. He had to be brought with a taxi.

High transportation costs are another factor that renders going to the hospital difficult. Same thing with the road blockades. A recent Unicef report states that less than 50% of the Iraqi population has access to the health care they need, because of the insecurity.

5. The hospital infrastructure has not improved over the past year.

We visited some 25 hospitals, clinics and pharmacies. Nowhere had any new medical material arrived since the end of the war. The medical material, already outdated, broken down or malfunctioning after twelve years of embargo, had further deteriorated over the past year. In places where looting had taken place, there is now less material than before, as in Baghdad’s rehabilitation centre, which is supposed to provide the entire country of prostheses. Or as in the burns section of the Al Nour Hospital, where there is no possibility of sterile treatment, as a result of which all patients with major burns are doomed to die. Or as in the intensive care unit of the Kadhemya Hospital – which has 8 of the 16 high intensive care beds for Baghdad -, where only three respiration machines are functioning.

6. Medicines and medical material are lacking.

In the hospitals, some specific medicines are lacking, e.g. for burns. In several emergency units, live-saving drugs are not available.

In the ‘popular clinics’, for outpatients, there is a constant lack of medication. The Ministry of Health itself is distributing lists of medication, where for every drug the amount of products delivered is mentioned. We saw one such list containing 32 products. For 10 of them… 0% had been delivered! Many patients don’t get their medicines, or they get only half of the dose they need. Results: life quality diminishes, while the risk at early death increases. This is the case for e.g. epilepsy, hypertension, angina pectoris, diabetes, chronic asthma,…

Doctors may prescribe, but patients, who used to get their medicines for free, have to buy them now on the private market. For most of them, this is beyond reach. And many needed drugs are not always available on the market. There are also doubts as to the quality of these medicines, as they are not being stored in optimal conditions.

There is also a lack of disposable material, such as gauze, cotton, syringes, gloves, sutures,… In one ‘popular clinic’ we visited, three doctors had to share one single stethoscope, while one and the same iron tongue depressor was being used for all patients.

7. Depleted Uranium (DU): the population is not informed nor protected.

In August 2003, we were only able to obtain unofficial, ‘off the record’ information from the World Health Organization (WHO) concerning Depleted Uranium. The WHO had asked the US Armed Forces leadership information about the use of DU. They requested to be given a map indicating the places where the US Armed Forces had used ammunition with DU, in order to be able to undertake precautionary measures and prevent the contamination with and the spread of DU particles. The US Armed Forces leadership refused to provide this information. In March 2004, according to WHO sources, the attitude of the US Armed Forces and of the CPA (Coalition Provisional Authority) concerning this topic remained unchanged.

In 2003 and in March 2004, we could personally see that there were no fences nor warning signs around or near the destroyed Iraqi tanks and APC’s (armoured personnel carrier). Children were playing nearby. Most of this Iraqi army material has been destroyed by ammunition with DU. The areas where these tanks and other materials were hit, have not been decontaminated since. The earth around has not been removed. In the neighbourhood of the Baghdad Gate, we saw people cultivating vegetables, unaware of the danger, on fields where in April 2003 many destroyed Iraqi tanks stood. There were no protective measures to be seen. Along the road between Baghdad and Basra still a lot of destroyed tanks can be found. We saw people recycling metal from these tanks. This sometimes happens in an organised way: we saw open trucks, without canvass, fully loaded with pieces of those Iraqi tanks. In the south of Baghdad there is an area where this recycled metal is collected. Again without any protective measure. DU-contaminated dust is spread by the trucks and with the wind.

Medical doctors in Basra told us that they expect a rise in cancers and congenital malformations in a few years, particularly in Baghdad, because that is where DU has been used most. The CPA and the occupying forces have the duty to protect the health of the population. In the matter of DU they are neglecting their responsibility.

8. The plans of the CPA and the Ministry of Health are no solution.

Until last year, a number of contracts for medical material that had been signed by the previous regime were blocked by the UN Sanctions Committee 661. 90 % of them because of a US veto, 10 % because of a British veto. It concerned contracts for a total value of more than 500 million dollar. This money, which came from the sale of Iraqi oil in the framework of the oil-for-food program, was available on a UN account in New York. After the lifting of the sanctions, this money has been turned over to the CPA, and yet those contracts have not yet been executed.

The CPA and the interim government are now talking about new plans to invest in medicines and medical equipment. This can at most be part of the solution, but even then it is a case of ‘too little, too late’. There are plans for a new paediatric hospital of more than 50 million dollar. This money would be put to better use by upgrading the existing hospitals. Much of the money will go to expensive US firms, and it can be feared that these investments will have a high PR value. This is a case of combating the symptoms in order to divert attention from the real prevention of illness and disease, by attacking the root causes such as purchasing power, the food situation, the living conditions, the insecurity.

In any case, these investments will not free the occupying power of its duty to guarantee all necessary services to the Iraqi population, as it is stated in the Fourth Geneva Convention. Security, jobs, an income, food and decent living conditions are all part of this. All these factors have a major impact on public health.

9. Appendix: April 2004: US-led troops in Iraq are targeting hospitals, ambulances and civilians.

We received information from first hand field testimonies from health workers in Iraq and eye-witness accounts from Fallujah. According to that information, the US-led occupying forces have:

1. targeted unarmed civilians and used cluster bombs in populated areas of the city. This is indiscriminate use of force, not discriminating combatants from non-combatants. There are several reports of eyewitnesses stating that cluster bombs are used in Fallujah. These reports are confirmed by medical doctors.

2. severely hampered relief work to the wounded.

3. blocked access to Fallujah’s hospital thus forcing doctors and health personnel to set up field hospitals in private homes.

4. targeted ambulances that went about the city to collect the injured.

All of these constitute violations of the Geneva Conventions. They have resulted in the death of hundreds of civilians and extreme misery for thousands of people in Fallujah and many more in the rest of Iraq.

This is comparable to what happened during the US-led invasion of Baghdad last year. We were personally witness of the use of cluster bombs and of US troops shooting at random at civilians, civil cars and ambulances. Then, as now, it was difficult and even impossible for the health personnel to reach the hospitals, because US troops were shooting at everything that came on their way.

Dr. Geert Van Moorter, M.D.

28 April 2004.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...