Official Assessment of Civilian Destruction in Yugoslavia March 24 – April 7, 1999

Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Belgrade
“YUGOSLAV DAILY SURVEY” 

CIVILIAN CASUALTIES

From the onset of NATO aggression against our country up to 6 April 1999, the North Atlantic Alliance made over 1,000 criminal attacks against the territory of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 430 warplanes, of which 330 combat planes, were used; more than 800 cruise missiles were launched and over 3,000 tons of explosives were dropped.

About 300 civilians were killed and more than 3,000 sustained serious injuries (e.g., in Kur Yumlija: 13 dead and 25 wounded; in Pancevo: 2 dead and 4 wounded; in Sacak: one dead and 7 wounded; in Vranje; two dead and 23 wounded; in Aleksinac: 12 dead and more than 40 wounded; in Nagavac village, Orahovac municipality: 11 dead and 5 wounded, in Pristina: 10 dead and 8 wounded).

TRAFFIC

The road and railway networks, especially road and rail bridges, most of which were destroyed or damaged beyond repair, suffered extensive destruction. The targets of attacks were such traffic infrastructure as: 

BRIDGES (6 DESTROYED AND 8 DAMAGED): 

1. The Varadin Bridge over the Danube was destroyed (on 1 April 1999); 

2. The “Sloboda” (Freedom) Bridge over the Danube was destroyed (on 4 April 1999); 

3. The “25. maj” Bridge over the Danube, connecting Baska Palanka with Ilok, was damaged (on 4 April 1999);

4. The new railway bridge over the Danube connecting Bogojevo and Erdut was damaged (on 5 April 1999); 

5. The road bridge over the Danube, connecting Bogojevo with Erdut was damaged (on 5 April 1999);

6. The bridge over the Danube along the Beograd-Novi Sad road, near Be Yka, Indjija municipality, was damaged (on 1 April 1999); 

7. The road bridge along the Magura Belasevac road, 15 kilometres from Pristina, suffered extensive damage; 

8. The “Ceseljov” Bridge in Novi Sad was damaged (on 5 April 1999); 

9. The bridge over the Ibar river, Biljanovac municipality, was damaged (on 5 April 1999); 

10. The bridge over the Vrbaska river near Jezgrovic was destroyed (on 5 April 1999); 

11. The “Lozno” railway bridge near Uce was destroyed (on 5 April 1999); 

12. The road bridge on the road leading to Brvenik, near U sce, was destroyed (on 5 April 1999); 

13. The bridge along the Nis-Pristina primary road, near Kursumlija, suffered extensive damage (on 5 April 1999); 

14. The bridge near Zubin Potok was destroyed (on 5 April 1999). 

RAILWAYS (6): 

1. The Kraljevo to Kosovo Polje rail, near Ibarska Slatina; 

2. The Belgrade to Bar rail (dynamited near Strbac village); 

3. The Kur Yumlija to Prokuplje rail, near Pepeljevac village; 

4. The Kraljevo to Kosovo Polje, near Ibarska Slatina; 

5. The Nis to Pristina rail, near Kursumlija; 

6. “Arpelj” tunnel, near Jerinje village, 15 km north of Leposavic towards Raska, was destroyed; 

ROADS AND TRANSPORTERS (3 MAJOR ROADS): 

1. Ibarska primary road, due to damage to the bridge over the Ibar river, Biljanovac municipality; 

2. Belgrade-Zagreb highway, near Stari Banovci; 

3. Traffic suspended on the Kosovska Mitrovica-Ribari_i section of the Adriatic highway due to the destruction of the bridge over the Vrba_ka river; 

4. “Jedinstvo” bus station in Vranje sustained extensive damage; 

5. “Kosmet Prevoz” transporter in Gnjilane (a hangar full of new buses); 

Airports (5): 

– “Slatina” in Pristina; “Batajnica” and “Surcin” in Belgrade; Nis airport; “Golubovac” in Podgorica. 

ECONOMIC AND CIVILIAN TARGETS, PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS

The air strikes have so far destroyed or damaged all over the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia several thousand economic facilities and dwellings. In the Leskovac region alone, over 3,300 industrial facilities and dwellings were either destroyed or damaged.

The devastation of NATO forces was particularly manifest in Pri Ytina, Novi Sad, Djakovica, Prokuplje, Gracanica, etc. Housing blocks on the outskirts of Belgrade – Kijevo Knesevac, Batajnica, Jakovo, Borsa as well as the area around Pancevo, were under attack.

INDUSTRY AND TRADE:

The NATO aggressor’s attacks targeted the factories and industrial facilities which directly cater for the needs of the population, among which are:

1. “Lola Utva” agricultural aircraft factory in Pancevo;

2. “Galenika” drug factory in Belgrade;

3. “Zdravlje” pharmaceutical plant in Leskovac;

4. “Sloboda” white goods factory;

5. “Din” tobacco industry in Nis;

6. “Elektronska industrija” factory in Nis;

7. “Div” cigarette factory in Vranje;

8. Tubes factory in Urosevac;

9. “Jastrebac” machine industry in Nis;

10. “Milan Blagojevic” chemical plant in Lucani;

11. Plastics factory in Pristina;

12. “Bina_ka Morava” hydro construction company in Gnjilane;

13. “Nova Jugoslavija” printers in Vranje;

14. Facilities of the “Beograd” rail company in Nis;

15. Over 250 commercial and crafts shops in Djakovica were destroyed.

Refineries and warehouses storing liquid raw materials and chemicals intended for the oil and chemical industry, were hit in Pancevo, Novi Sad, Sombor and elsewhere, causing large contamination of soil and the air:

1. Fuel storage in Lipovica, which caused a great fire in the Lipovica forest (on 26 March 1999);

2. Power plant belonging to the oil refinery in Pancevo (on 4 April 1999);

3. “Jugopetrol” installations in Smederevo (on 4 April 1999) 

4. “Jugopetrol” storage in Sombor (on 7 April 1999);

5. “Beopetrol” storages in Belgrade nd Bogutovac (on 4 April 1999);

6. “Beopetrol” fuel storage in Pristina (on 7 April 1999);

7. Fuel storage of the boiler plant in Novi Beograd (on 4 April 1999);

8. Thermo electric power station/boiler plant in Novi Sad (on 5 April 1999).

9. Oil Refinery in Novi Sad, storage of bitumen (5 and 6 April 1999);

10. Fuel storage “Naftagas promet” which is located 10 km from Sombor (5 April 1999)

Note: After these barbaric attacks, hundreds of thousands of citizens were exposed to gas poisoning, which may have lasting consequences to overall health of citizens and environment.

By totally destroying business facilities across the country, 500,000 workers were left jobless, and 2 million citizens without any source of income and possibility to ensure the minimum living conditions.

AGRICULTURE:

1. PIK “Kopaonik” in Kursumlija;

2. PIK “Mladost” in Gnjilane;

3. Agricultural Complex “Malizgan” in Dolac.

HOSPITALS (13):

NATO aviation also targeted many hospitals and health-care institutions, which have been partially damaged or totally destroyed, including:

– Hospital and Medical Centre in the territory in Leskovac;

– Hospital and Poly-clinic in Nis;

– Gerontological Centre in Leskovac;

– General Hospital in Djakovica;

– City Hospital in Novi Sad;

– Gynaecological Hospital and Maternity Ward of the Clinical Centre in Belgrade;

– Neuropsychiatric Ward “Dr. Laza Lazarevic” and Central Pharmacy of the Emergency Centre in Belgrade;

– Army Medical Academy in Belgrade;

– Medical Centre and Ambulance Centre in Aleksinac.

SCHOOLS (MORE THAN 150 FACILITIES)

Over 150 schools and facilities for children were damaged or destroyed, including:

– Elementary schools “16. oktobar” and “Vladimir Rolovic” in Belgrade;

– Day-care centre in settlement Petlovo Brdo in Belgrade;

– Two secondary schools in the territory of Nis;

– Elementary schools “Toza Markovic”, “Djordje Natosevic” and “Veljko Vlahovic” and a day-care centre “Duga” in Novi Sad;

– Four elementary schools and a medical high school in the territory of Leskovac

– Elementary school in Lucane, as well as a larger number of education facilities in the territory of Kosovo and Metohija;

– Faculties of Law and Economics and elementary school “Radoje Domanovic” in Nis.

PUBLIC AND HOUSING FACILITIES (TENS OF THOUSANDS)

– Severe damage to the facilities of the Republican and Federal Ministry of the Interior in Belgrade (3 April 1999),

– Damage to the building of the Institute for Security of the Ministry of the Interior in Banjica (3 April 1999);

– Severe damage to the TV RTS studio in Pristina;

– Heavy damage to Hydro-Meteorological Station (Bukulja, near Arandjelovac);

– Post Office in Pristina destroyed (7 April 1999);

– Refugee centre in Pristina destroyed (7 April 1999);

– Several thousand housing facilities damaged or destroyed, privately or State owned, across Yugoslavia – most striking examples being housing blocks in downtown Aleksinac and those near Post Office in Pristina.

INFRASTRUCTURE

– Electrical Power Supply in Batajnica (26 March 1999);

– Damage to water supply system in Zemun (5 April 1999).

Note: When Petrovaradin bridge in Novi Sad and Petrovaradin were destroyed, Novi Sad and Petrovaradin were left without water (600,000 citizens) since the main and city water supply system was built in it. In the country on the whole, water supply network for around 1 million citizens was severed.

TELECOMMUNICATIONS

TV TRANSMITTERS:

1. Jastrebac (Prokuplje

2. Gucevo (Loznica

3. Cot (Fruska Gora)

4. Grmija (Pristina

5. Kutlovac (Stari Trg)

6. “Cigota” (Uzice)

7. “Tornik” (Uzice)

8. Transmitter on Crni Vrh (Jagodina)

9. Bogutovac (Pristina)

CULTURAL-HISTORICAL MONUMENTS AND RELIGIOUS SHRINES MEDIEVAL MONASTERIES AND (10):

1. Monastery Gracanica from 14th century (24 March – 6 April 1999);

2. Monastery Rakovica from 17th century (29 March 1999);

3. Patriarchate of Pec (1 April 1999);

4. Church in Jelasnica near Surdulica (4 April 1999);

5. Monastery of the Church of St. Juraj (built in 1714) in Petrovaradin (1 April 1999);

6. Monnastery of Holy Mother (12th century) at the estuary of the Kosanica in the Toplica – territory of municipality of Kursumlija (4 March 1999);

7. Monastery of St. Nicholas (12th century) in the territory of the municipality of Kursumlija (4 March 1999);

8. Monastery of St. Archangel Gabriel in Zemun (5 April 1999);

9. Roman Catholic Church St. Antonio in Djakovica (29 March 1999);

10. Orthodox cemetery in Gnjilane (30 March 1999).

CULTURAL-HISTORICAL MONUMENTS (6):

1. Severe damage to the roof structure of the Fortress of Petrovaradin (1 April 1999);

2. Heavy damage to “Tabacki bridge”, four centuries old, in Djakovica (5 April 1999);

3. Substantial damage to the building in Stara Carsija (Old street) in Djakovica (5 April 1999);

4. Destroyed archives housed in one of the Government buildings in Belgrade (3 April 1999);

5. Memorial complex in Gucevo (Loznica);

6. Memorial complex “Sumarice” in Kragujevac.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...