Mission Report TFF’s Second Mission to Burundi November 2003. With Co-Operation Agreement

Background

Christian Harleman and Jan Oberg conducted a fact-finding mission to Burundi between November 26 and December 6, 2003. (See websites about the country here). The first TFF mission took place in March 1999. Unfortunately, since then it has not been practically possible to implement the co-operation with Burundi’s Ministry of Education and Burundian NGOs that was planned at the time.

The 2003 mission had three purposes. First, to do fact-finding in general about the situation and, in particular, the progress under the Arusha Peace Process. Second, to explore the possibilities for co-operation between the government and relevant NGOs on the one hand and TFF on the other, in order to develop and deepen the existing competence in fields such as conflict-understanding, reconciliation and peace-building. Finally, third, to find out whether it would be possible, in co-operation with the Swedish Rescue Services Agency (Statens Räddningsverk), to establish a health care unit that – in addition to satisfying some of the evident, urgent needs in the country – could promote a very practical, on-the-ground development of such competence.

As is stipulated in the Arusha Agreement, the present government is transitional, and elections shall be held in about 11 months from now. By coincidence, a government reshuffle took place only four days before we arrived; Minister of Education, Prosper Mpawenayo, who four years ago had suggested that TFF come to Burundi, left the government. Given these developments, Harleman and Oberg did not attempt to establish any direct co-operation with that Ministry.

Furthermore, there seems to be a general perception among international NGOs and humanitarian organisations in the country that the best way to be helpful in this situation is to engage serious Burundian NGOs, rather than the government or ministries. Thus we concentrated on general fact-finding and identification of NGO partners that TFF could build a coalition with around the mentioned themes.

We had 39 meeting/interviews with organisations representing, e.g. women lawyers, youth, conflict-resolution, social science, reconciliation and media; we also met with the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Health, a presidential adviser as well as organisations such as UNESCO, CARE, UN-OCHA Burundi, Search for Common Ground and International Alert.

These meetings and interviews, each of 1-2 hours duration, gave us a fairly good understanding of the enormous problems that face the country at this point, both in general terms and in relation to the peace process. The Arusha Agreement leaves much to be desired in terms of basic approach and provisions and, when it comes to implementation on the ground, may imply considerable risk-taking by several actors.

At the same time, it is absolutely evident that – compared with four years ago – the general situation is more stable and, crucially, that the people are tired of war and rebel activity. It is clear that there is a new attitude and there is hope. We met many with good will and energy to set the country on a course toward peace and development.

But Burundi ranks as number 171 of the 175 countries on the UNDP Human Development Index and faces very serious problems with poverty, social and sexual violence, refugees abroad and internally displaced persons, foreign debt, infrastructure, education, AIDS, rebel activity, corruption, etc. The list of problems seem inhumanly long…

If one uses basic needs as the overriding criteria, there is all reason to get engaged in Burundi. Without international government and NGO assistance, the country will not stand a chance to move forward, and the risk of descending into new direct and deeper structural violence will increase. Much is at stake for this country of 7 million people.

Co-operation Agreement with Burundian NGOs

Until further, TFF has selected 8 Burundian NGOs with which we have written a Letter of Understanding (English edition& French edition) concerning a well-structured, future co-operation, pending the TFF Board so decides and that such a project will eventually obtain the needed funding. (The Board decided in favour of this endeavour on December 8, 2003).

With these eigth organisations we have created the TFF Amahoro Coalition in Burundi. “Amahoro” means peace. The Coalition aims to create synergy among these civil society organisations and promote horizontal working relations, something that is somewhat lacking in today’s Burundian NGO community. Further, TFF shall assist the Coalition members in developing a common program with sub-projects within the broad field of conflict-handling, violence-prevention, reconciliation, human rights and related themes.

Such a broad, multi-competent NGO coalition – all experienced and having dynamic leaderships – shall serve to make a difference for the Burundians now when the peace process needs to be anchored and solidified as well as carried to all corners of the country (90 per cent of the people live in the countryside).

The organisations have declared themselves willing, within a few weeks, to try to create a broad multi-year program with subprojects that TFF shall be able to deliver inputs to but which it shall not steer; it is essential that the NGO partners in Burundi feel that it is their project, not TFF’s. Later, TFF will present the Amahoro Coalition’s project proposal with a funding plan to Sida, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency and possibly other potential donors.

Party to the Letter of Understanding is also Dr. Adolphe Sururu, Burundi’s National University, who will serve as program co-ordinator and Ms. Chantal Mutamuriza who will be our liaison, practical assistant, interpreter and translator. We are happy that they have both accepted to become TFF Associates and play these very important roles.

At least for the moment, TFF does not intend to establish an organisation in the country. Until further, we believe that our two Associates can provide an excellent support for the Coalition and a bridge-builder for TFF. With relevant officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs we have investigated what formal requirements the government applies vis-a-vis foreign NGOs working in Burundi. For the type of activity we aim to conduct as part of the Amahoro Coalition, there is no need for formal registration of TFF with local authorities. However all our partners are, of course, registered under Burundian law.

During our conversation with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, we were asked whether we would be willing to take up contact with FNL militia representatives living in Denmark and Sweden in order to encourage them to put pressure on the FNL back home. We simply said we were willing to do whatever could be helpful at the moment, and the minister promised to come back to us if he obtained the acceptance by the President.

The health care unit

During our meeting with the Ministers of Health and Foreign Affairs, we presented the Swedish Rescue Services Agency (Statens Räddningsverks) health care unit project. The Minister of Health expressed his gratitude and interest and emphasised that the unit must be seen as part of an integrated approach; he was ready to explore how the unit could be set up both in co-operation with a humanitarian NGO as well as with e.g. UNICEF, or with both. What is required to implement the project is a formal agreement with the Ministry of Health and a bilateral one between the Swedish and the Burundian Ministries of Foreign Affairs.

Proposals for future activities

1. In all possible way to assist our Burundian partners in the Amahoro Coaltion to develop the common program, including a budget proposal.

2. To present the Program to Sida and other relevant donors.

3. Report to the relevant officials in charge of Africa/Great Lakes/Burundi at the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Afairs and Sida, in particular those who participated in the official Swedish delegation which visited the Great Lakes Region in November 2003.

4. Write a series of TFF PressInfos about the situation in Burundi that can serve, in the best of cases, to attract positive attention to the country, to the Arusha Peace process and contribute to an increased international awareness and understanding of the fact that NOW is the time for the international community to engage in this country.

6. Take up contact with FNL representatives in Denmark and Sweden if asked to do so by Bujumbura.

7. Do follow-up with the Swedish Rescue Services Agency (Räddningsverket) concerning the health unit discussed.

8. Write a series of articles for the Nordic and international press about Burundi, the country that works, against almost all odds, to consolidate the peace and only is likely to succeed if given the necessary minimum attention and assistance from abroad – now.

We want to thank the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the economic support that made it possible to conduct this mission which is part of our larger project on Reconciliation and Forgiveness.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...