PressInfo #67 – KOSOVSKI PRINCIPI – Grupe G 8 JOS JEDNA PREVARA S MIROVNIM PLANOM

“Ministri inostranih poslova zemalja G8 izdali su
deklaraciju o principima na osnovu kojih treba da se resi
kriza na Kosovu. To je mesavina raznorodnih elemenata koji
sluze da spasu obraz Zapada a ne doticu se ni jednog
jedinog od uzroka same krize a ni uzroka zbog kojih Zapad
kao medijator do sad nije imao uspeha. kaze direktor TFF-a
Jan Oberg. Ova deklaracija moze da posluzi jedino zato da
opravda nastavak bombardovanja, a ako se ipak primeni,
obecava vrlo tuznu buducnost za citavi Balkan. No, jedne
stvari ipak imamo u izobilju, nepismenosti u konfliktima,
pa nam danas vodeci mediji i ovo nazivaju Mirovnim planom
ponavljajuci tako gresku iz Rambujea. U prilogu imate
celoviti tekst Principa G 8 kako ih je objavio BBC, 6. maja
99. 

– – – – –

“Sledeci opsti principi moraju biti usvojeni i
primenjeni u resavanju krize na Kosovu:

* Trenutna i lako proveriva obustava nasilja i represije
na Kosovu.

* Povlacenje s Kosova vojnih, policijskih i paravojnih
snaga.

* Razmestanje na Kosovu efikasnog medjunarodnog civilnog
i bezbednosnog prisustva, o kojem treba da odluce i da ga
podrze Ujedinjene Nacije, sposobnog da osigura postizanje
opstih ciljeva.

* Uspostavljanje prelazne uprave za Kosovo, o kojoj ce
odluciti Savet bezbednosti Ujedinjenih Naroda, a koja treba
da osigura uslove za miran i normalan zivot za sve
stanovnike Kosova.

* Siguran i slobodan povratak za sve izbeglice i
raseljena lica i nesmetani pristup Kosovu za sve
organizacije za humanitarnu pomoc.

* Politicki proces usmeren ka uspostavi prelaznih
politickih okvira. Sporazum koji ce osigurati znacajnu
samoupravu za Kosovo uz puno postovanje Sprazuma iz
Rambujea i principa i suvereniteta i teritorijalnog
integriteta SR Jugoslavije i drugih drzava regiona i
demilitarizaciju OVK.

* Sveobuhvatan pristup ekonomskom razvoju i stabilizaciji
kriznog podrucja.

– – – –

Evo vam 10 razloga zasto ovu Deklaraciju mozemo da
smatramo samo za jos jednu mirovnu prevaru:

1. Ministri ovo nazivaju kriza, a ne konflikt ili rat.
Time naglasavaju svoju nameru da naprave obrazac za
spasavanje vlastitog obraza zbog krize koju je stvorio NATO
balkanskom bombarderskom brljotinom. Ljudi u Jugoslaviji
(SRJ), Kosovari posebno a i susedne zemlje to sagledavaju
kao konflikt koji je eksplodirao u rat i agresiju. Principi
ni ne dodiriju ni jedan od dubokih korena samog sukoba i u
zizu svoje paznje nisu uzeli ni jednu potrebu ljudi koji
zive u ovom regionu.

2. Potpuno izbegavaju bilo kakvo pominjanje NATO-ovog
bombardovanja i uslove pod kojima bi ono eventualno moglo
da prestane.

3. Prva stvar koju ministri spominju je povlacenje SRJ
snaga (kojih, svih ili samo nekih, odakle i kuda?) a
zavrsavaju sa opstom odrednicom (kasnijeg) razoruzanja OVK
i to pod tackom politicki proces. Ovim se u potpunosti
nastavlja neuravnotezenost – koju je prosle godine uneo
ambasador Holbruk – u odnosima s dve sukobljene
strane-snage u gradjanskom ratu.

4. Ne govore se nista da li sve ili samo neke snage SRJ
treba da se povuku. Oni pominju demilitarizaciju OVK, no
moze li uopste postojati vojska bez oruzja? Ako moze, nije
li to onda podrska Vladi u kojoj ce dominirati OVK – ionako
nedavno formirane izvan Ustava i politickih okvira
Kosova?

5. Ministri izbegavaju da definisu medjunarodno
prisustvo, mada izraz medjunarodno civilno i bezbednosno
sam za sebe doista predstavlja znacajan otklon od jedino
NATO pa predvodjene NATO-om i medjunarodne bezbednosne
snage s jezgrom od NATO-a. Dobro je da su UN konacno dobile
neku ulogu da odigraju, no da li ce one ovde biti
predvodnik ili samo talac s gumenim pecatom u ruci?

6. Mesta koja se odnose na teritorijalni integritet i
suverenitet SRJ su jednostavno nedovoljna. Deklaracijom se
ne pominje da ce se SRJ pitati, konsultovati o pitanjima
njene vlastite buducnosti. Vece bezbednosti UN-a ce
odluciti o prelaznoj upravi i prelaznom politickom okviru
koji ce u celosti ispostovati sprazum iz Rambujea. A taj je
ugrozio i integritet i suverenitet SRJ i uopste nije ni bio
nikakav sporazum.

7. Ministri kao da veruju da je ono sto je potrebno da se
donese mir ovom regionu prelazna uprava za Kosovo, a ne
socijalo-psiholoske na pojedincima zasnovane mere na
uspostavi mirovnog procesa. Time se nastavlja
katastrofalni, od vrha ka bazi inzenjering ili menadzerski
pristup konfliktu u kojem je neophodan preokret usmeren ka
konsultacijama, uspostavi poverenja i ozivljavanju civilnog
drustva koja svima treba.

8. Najzanimljivije u deklaraciji je to sto ni recju ne
pominje poimenicno: a) lokalne i regionalne mere na
uspostavi medjusobnog poverenja, b) konsultacije sa SRJ,
OVK-UCK i dr. Rugovom, c) pregovore koji bi se vodili
izmedju tvrdih jezgri sukobljenih strana i d) balkanski
regionalni pristup i procese.

9. Ministri izbegavaju da pomenu bilo kakvo zaljenje, a
jos manje izvinjenje narodima Jugoslavije za pale civilne
zrtve i nastalu stetu – cime zalosno propustaju dobru
priliku da otvore vrata pomirenja izmedju NATO zemalja i 10
miliona gradjana SRJ. Uz potpuni nedostatak samokritike i
sazaljenja, G-8 ipak veruju da ce se NATO zemlje izvuci
nekaznjene za to sto prvo nisu uspele da sprece nasilje,
zatim sto su pristrasnim posredovanjem i agresijom same sebe
onemogucile da budu ono sto sad zele da postanu, a to je
ovlasteni mirotvorci od poverenja!

10. Sa tako puno elementarnih pitanja na koja se
propustilo da se odgovori i s toliko puno neodredjenosti,
SRJ ce verovatno traziti pojasnjenja ili ce reci ne – a
onda ce NATO moci s punim legitimitetom da nastavi da
bombarduje one koji eto nastavljaju da odbacuju mirovne
principe.

Ovaj dokument ne uspeva da otvori ni jedna od vrata za
istinskog resavanja sukoba. On se ne odnosi ni na jedan od
izvornih korena srpsko-albanskog sukoba, a ni jos gore
regionalne i svetske krize koju je svojom katastrofalnom
politikom NATO izazvao.

Zamagljivanjem, omaskama, nedorecenoscu, kontradikcijama
i potpunim nedostatkom bilo kakvog izraza zaljenja zbog
patnji ljudi – izrazene su duboke podele koje stoje medju
tvorcima ovog nacrta. Rusija se ukrcala na ovaj brod – ako
jeste – samo zato sto joj je Zapad vazniji nego Kosovo.
Iznenadilo bi me ako Jugoslavija ovo shvati ikako drukcije
nego kao praznu deklaraciju. Tragicno je da najmocniji
svetski lideri nisu ni dan danas naucili nijednu lekciju o
razresavanju sukoba. Da parafraziram Ajnstajna, – Posle 24.
marta s NATO-ovim bombardovanjem nista vise nije isto osim
jedne stvari – nacina na koji mocni lideri razmisljaju o
sukobime i o miru a to nas sigurno vodi u nove i nove
katastrofe, predvidja Jan Oberg.

© TFF 1999

• You are welcome to re-print, copy, archive, quote
from or re-post this item, but please retain the source.

• TFF’s website has all the relevant links to Iraq,
the Balkans, including media there + peace research, and
non-violence

• Teacher, activist, journalist?? You’ll always find
something interesting at TFF.

• Get your daily global news from the leading media
on TFF’s site, all in one place.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Read More
Screenshot 2026-10-26 115647
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Screenshot 2026-10-15 141837
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
images-2
Advocates of nuclear disarmament are regularly dismissed by the champions of nuclear deterrence as naïve and unrealistic, utopian or even irresponsible. Yet this ‘doctrine’ of deterrence, regarded by France as the ‘cornerstone’ of its national security, is based on quasi-religious beliefs, a theory that cannot be proven, risky gambles and fragile assumptions. So much so that one might legitimately ask which side the ‘Care Bears’ are on. Marc FinaudVice-President of Initiatives for Nuclear Disarmament (IDN) October 9, 2026 This article was originally published on Pressenza When it comes to these things being treated as religious concepts, look here. Idealists and realists It was Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand’s former Foreign Minister, who repeatedly coined the phrase: ‘Europeans are a sort of Care Bears who don’t realise they’re living in Jurassic Park’. He applies this reference to the cartoon for well-behaved children not only to what he regards as weakness or idealism...