Irak 2
Helsingborgs Dagblad

Sådan kan det se ud, hvis man en tilfældig aften zapper på fjernsynet i Baghdad.

TV 1 har en engelsk-amerikansk action film med øksemord. TV 2 har fodbold i direktsending. En anden kanal har et interview med en brittisk aktivist, som har taget medicin med til Irak og taler om, hvor vigtigt det er at informere mennesker derhjemme. Det foregår på engelsk uden oversættelse; såvidt jeg opfatter er det en del af Iraq Highlight, det ene af de to programmer jeg ser, som har international profil. Her bliver seerne oplyst om, hvad der er sket i løbet af dagen; forskellige lederes møde med diplomater, regimets politiske fokus, og, naturligvis, hvem Saddam Hussein har truffet i dag, skrevet til eller fået brev fra. En aften lovpriser han flyvevåbnets heroiske kamp og beredskab mod aggressioner.

På Iraq Satelite Channel vises der ved midnatstid Press Review. Her fortælles hvad aviser i udlandet, specielt i Vest, har skrevet om Irak. Man citerer især artikler som er kritiske til vestverdenen og USAs politik. Den internationelle nyhedsoversigt har disse indslag: Irak bekæmper terrorismen i verden, men USA er den største terrorist af alle. Forbedrede relationer og samarbejdsaftaler med andre arabiske stater. Irak har forbedret forholdet til både Iran og Saudiarabien. Eksport af irakisk råolje fra (fra?, jeg er usikker på hvad meningen er/eller er det måske en trykfejl?) Tyrkiet genoptages. Jordskælv i Taiwan. Varmebølge i Indien. Arabiske stater støtter de modige palestinensere i deres kamp. (Jeg tænker på, hvor nyttigt det er for mig sådan at få tilgang til det verdensbillede, irakerne lever med.)

Senere tilbyder kanalen IrakTV en dokumentar om staten Israels fødsel, terroren under Begin og Shamir, Ben Gurions lederskab, Klagemuren i Jerusalem og dagens sionisme, (som irakerne for øvrigt ser som et større problem end USA). På andre kanaler vises arabiske musikvideoer, rapport fra en militær træningslejr og, javist da, en film med Julia Roberts.

En eftermiddag ved 16-tiden kan jeg se arabisk solodans ackompagneret af et traditionelt orkester med smægtende violiner. En lavstammet kvinde med røde læber, rigeligt brøstmål, langt hår og vuggende hofter, danser i en stram, sort kjole, – ekspressivt, to say the least. Nabokanalens disco-gogo girl, som forresten ikke står tilbage for sine vesterlandske søstrer i afklædthed, kan gå hjem og lægge sig i sammenligning med denne pige og også de andre, der danser forføreriskt og graciøst efter hende.

Amerikansk kultur lukkes virkelig ikke ude her. Stort set hver dag ser jeg amerikansk film på en eller anden kanal. Det morsomme med dem er, at lyd og billede pludselig kan stoppe, og så kommer der et skilt som siger, at denne film er i privat eje, og at man, hvis man har lejet den, skal ringe til et nr. i New York! Det er altså formodentlig stjålne videofilm fra forskellige steder i verden. Flere var tekstet på japansk, og en Disney-film havde svensk tekst!

Om morgenen ser man ofte, på en eller flere kanaler, landets symbol med ørnen og et hjerteformet flag i midten. Udfra dette hjerte stiger så Saddam Husseins ansigt frem og man ser billeder af soldater der marcherer og “smørsangere”, der synger til Saddams ære. Det er selvfølgelig umuligt at glemme, hvem der har magten her. Der er tusindvis af monumenter og malerier (gudsforbarmende dårlige kunsteriskt set) på Baghdads gader; og i enhver offentlig modtagning, på ethvert kontor, er der mindst en, ofte tre – fire, billeder af Saddam i alle mulige poser og antræk. En unik personkult og, for mig, patetisk. Jeg tolker den som at Saddam vil huskes, ikke bare mens han er her, men også efter sin tid, sådan i stil med Nebukadnesar. Der foregår altså konstant en slags planlægning for udødelighed. Man kan spekulere på, om der virkelig er nogen der ser disse portrætter på gader og veje, mere end man f.eks.ser gadelygter eller fortovskanter.

På Iraq Satelite Channel News omkring midnat d. 20 – 21 maj: President Saddam Hussein er formand for årets 27. kabinetsmøde i årets Højeste Revolutionære Kommandørråd.(?? el. kommandoråd?? eller befalingsråd??) Han er den eneste der optræder i civil, alle ministre er i grønne uniformer og baskerhuer; de rejser sig og gør honnør når han træder ind. Rummets væge er hvide og lyset siver ind gennem hvide gardiner. Iraks flag står til venstre i billedet bag Saddam. Der er blomsterarrangementer og vandglas på bordet, ingen papirstabler eller tegn på at man har travlt. Speakeren siger blot få ord. Kameraet fokuserer så på Presidenten, hvis ansigt hverken afslører indre eller ydre bevægelse. Sekvensen gentages, hvorefter speakeren tier. I godt et minuts tid understreges rummets sakrale karakter af en langsom sekvens fra en Bach-kantate. Jeg oplever det som rendyrket politisk religion! TV-billedet bliver atter levende for til sidst at gentages, nu med underlagt marchmusik. Derefter ser vi at det 33. internetcafé er blevet åbnet i Baghdad. Det er noget forvirrende, eftersom der samtidigt bliver sagt, at sanktionerne har forhindret at komputerer kommer ind i Irak (fordi de jo kan bruges både civilt og mililtært), men man må ikke glemme smuglertrafikken! Internet holder altså sit indtog i Irak, ligesom e-mail, naturligvis. Satelit-TV har det lidt sværere. Privatpersoner må ikke have egen parabol, og skulle de have det alligevel, oppe på taget – gemt bagved vandtanken, som findes på alle tage, så risikerer de at naboer og endda slægtninge angiver dem. Synderen må bøde med hvad der modsvarer 500 dollar, og angiveren bliver belønnet med 250, hvilket er en enorm sum for almindelige mennesker, hvis månedsløn eller pension kan være på ca. 5 – 10 dollar. Det er frestende at blive angiver!

Til sidst, hvordan ser det ud på avisområdet? Da jeg ikke kan læse arabisk, har jeg ingen opfatning af de tre eksisterende morgenaviser, hvilke, i følge oplysninger, tilhører hæren og Baath-partiet. Den 22. maj havde de alle tre det samme billede – presidenten i forhandling med en delegation af en eller anden slag, – samme rubricering, samme placering på forsiden. Der er en engelsksproget morgenavis, Iraq Daily, som altid giver et citat (i dårlig oversættelse, siges det) af Saddam Hussein og ellers indeholder indenrigs, internationonelle og arabiske nyheder samt features, samfund, sundhed, livsstil, kultur, videnskab, teknologi og IT-information. I udgaven fra d.28. maj var der 4 sider kultur, litteratur og film og en eneste side med sport, altså en, i min smag, bedre balance end i den vestlige verdens medier! En del af artiklerne handler om vestlige forfattere eller kunstnere og er oversætninger fra f.eks. BBC materiale. (Se selv på www.uruklink.net/iraqdaily

Det er sandt nok, at der ikke er fri presse og fri debat her. Vestlige kilder gør gældende at alle medier kontroleres af Saddam, af en af hans sønner eller af en anden slægtning. Deraf skal man imidlertid ikke drage den slutsats, at irakerne er uinformerede, uvidende eller ikke kan tænke selv. I virkeligheden ved de meget mere om vestverdenen via radio, tv, internet og aviser, end hvad vi ved om Irak. Og det er vores problem, – og det viser at VI har en ufri presse på en anden måde, styret af andre interesser, men sandelig ikke fri.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...