Is Iran Next? The US, Iran and Nuclear Proliferation Features collected by TFF • Materials from the last few years till today

A series of guides, directories and articles with many and quite different aspects.
TFF produces Feature Collections on topical issues to to help anyone inform themselves and search for more information. TFF accepts no responsibility for the content of these articles.
Newest stuff added at the bottom

Guides, directories and link collections

Wikipedia – The Free Encyclopedia
Iran – lots of relevant background materials

US Library of Congress
Country study Iran

IranMania.com
Probably the largest Iranian Internet portal
General information on Iran here.

Iran Online – link collection

Iranian.ws & Persian Journal
Progressive Iranian Community

PetroleumIran.com
Iran – an extremely comprehensive list of links to all aspects of Iran

EIA, Washington
Iran – economy and its oil

The Economist
Iran Factsheet

MSNBC – The Secret Empire – The Iran Files

Better World Links
Iran – numerous resources for the understanding of Iran

Wikipedia – the Free Encyclopedia
Iran’s nuclear program
Disputed by some but full of useful links

The Guardian – Special on Iran
Numerous links over time

The Guardian
Iran’s nuclear programme

The International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

IAEA: all about its activities concerning Iran
Included all relevant documents

Norbert’s Bookmarks
Iran – very comprehensive link collection organised in themes

The EU and Iran

The EU’s relations with Iran

Netiran Political desk, November 30th, 2004
Final text of EU draft resolution on Iran’s nuclear dossier

Iranian government resources

Iran’s government spokesman

U.S. government resources

State Department
Iran in General & US-Iranian relations

State Department – Iran

John Bolton, U.S. Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, August 2004
Preventing Iran from acquring nuclear weapons

Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times
U.S. adds Israel to the Iraq equation
The Jewish state “might well decide to act first” to foil Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, Cheney says.

US House of Representatives
Iran Freedom and Democracy Support Act

Would you be browsing this Collection now,
if it wasn’t useful to you?
Support TFF and get more quality articles like this in the future

U.S. sanctions

Global Policy Forum
UN sanctions against Iran?

Mehrdad Valibeigi
Law on unintended consequences: US sanctions and Iran’s hardliners

Herman Franssen & Elaine Morton, Middle East Economic Survey
A review of US unilateral sanctions against Iran

Jeffrey J. Schott, Institute of International Economics, Testimony 1997
The Iran and Libya Sanctions Act of 1996: Results to date

CNNMoney
More than 30 U.S. companies are operating in Iran despite sanctions imposed in 1980

MSNBC News
Powell: U.S. wants U.N. sanctions against Iran

Backgrounders to the nuclear crisis

Mohammad Sahimi, Payvand
Iran’s nuclear program: Part I – Its history
Part II: Are nuclear reactors necessary?
Part III: The emerging crisis

BBC
Iran: Nuclear crisis timeline

Eric Marquardt, PINR Report 2003
Iran’s race for nuclear weapons

Scott Peterson, Christian Science Monitor
A push for candor in Iran nukes
Iran rejects curbs on nuke plans

Dan Murphy, Christian Science Monitor
Why Iran wants its own nuclear deterrent

Safa Haeri, Asian Times
Tehran pushes its own agenda

Dan De Luce, Christian Science Monitor 2003
50 years later, Iranians remember US-UK coup

CNN, November 2004
UN: No proof of Iran N-bomb work

International Crisis Group
10 reports and briefings since 2002 concerning Iran

U.S. intervention – is Iran next?

Seymour M. Hersh, The New Yorker 2001
The Iran Game. How will Tehran’s nuclear ambitions affect our budding partnership?

In Our Name
U.S. Intervention Timeline: Iran

Jim Lobe, IPS & FPIF
Shadowy neo-con adviser moves in Iran
Is Tehran back in the crosshairs of the neocon crusade?

Jim Lobe, Terraviva
Iran: Hawks plan ‘peaceful’ regime change

Seymour M. Hersh, The New Yorker
Plan B
On Iran-Iraq-US relations and the involvement of Israel in the Kurdish areas with operatives inside Iran…

Ivo H. Daalder, Brookings Institution
Uncle Sam’s regime change in Iran.
Review of Kinzer’s book, All the Shah’s men

Tariq Ali, The Nation 2003
Operation Iranian Freedom (3 parts)

Tom Barry, In These Times
Is Iran next?

Mariah Blake, Columbia Journalism Review & AlterNet
Targetting Tehran
By beaming dissent into Iran, much of it aimed at improving the lot of women, expat broadcasters are weakening the clerics’ chokehold on news.

Steven Weisman, New York Times & TruthOut
Bush confronts new challenge on issue of Iran

Get TFF analyses, debate articles, site updatesand peace tips – free of charge

Steven R. Weissman, The New York Times
U.S.-European discord over Iran is deepening

Reuters
U.S. conducting secret missions inside Iran

ISNA – Netiran
Iran detains more than 10 nuclear spies

Kaveh L. Afrasiabi
How Iran will fight back

Iran’s foreign minister, Aljazeera
Iran may strike if sites threatened

Rupert Cornwell, The Independent
Why the hawks are circling over Iran

Dafne Linzer, Washington Post, Nov 19, 2004
Nuclear disclosures (Colin Powell’s) on Iran unverified

Douglas Jehl & William Broad, The New York Times, November 20, 2004
Doubts persist on Iran nuclear arms goals
Intelligence shortfall on Iran’ arms

Uncertainty hinders U.S. push for hard line, officials say.

Sultan Shahin, Asia Times
Iran, nukes and the South Asian puzzle

Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch
Persian paranoia?

International Crisis Group
Where next on the nuclear standoff?

Kam Zarrabi, Asia Times
Iran approaches a flashpoint
The official motives – and alternative interpretations

Kaveh L. Afrasiabi, Asia Times
The dilemmas of Iran’s policy toward Iraq

Kaveh L. Afrasiabi, Asia Times & ZNet
China rocks the geopolitical boat with Iran oil deal

Amy Goodman, Democracy Now
Iran: The next strategic target
Interview with Seymour Hersh

Seymour Hersh, The New Yorker
The coming wars. What the Pentagon can now do in secret

Aljazeera
Iran dismissive of US military threats
Iran has said a US military strike against it would be a strategic blunder but brushed aside tough talk from Washington as psychological warfare rather than a real threat.

Lawrence Smallman, Aljazeera
Will the US attack Iran?
The consensus among experts is that any proxy war, invasion or missile strike on Iran would be a costly mistake, but opinion is divided as to whether it could happen anyway.

Steve Weissman – TruthOut
What if Iran has the bomb?

Aljazeera.com
U.S. is waging a psych. war- Iranian ambassador warns

CNN –
Iran: Bush shouldn’t point fingers on terror

Ignacio Ramonet, Le Monde Diplomatique
Iran: the wrong threat

Information Clearing House
Will Iran be next?

David E. Sanger and Steven R. Weisman The New York Times
U.S. and EU forge joint strategy on Iran talks

Channel NewsAsia
Iran snubs US incentives, vows to continue nuclear programme

MIXED THEMES

January-September 2005 – Selected articles

Times Online – March 13, 2005
Revealed: Israel plans strike on Iranian nuclear plant
Also here.

Frank Barnaby, Oxford Research Group
Briefing papers – Iran’s nuclear activities
You can download the analysis as pdf file

Rageh Omar, The Guardian, April 1, 2005
Another country
As rumours persist of US plans to invade Iran, Rageh Omaar, the face of the BBC during the Iraq war, visits Tehran – and finds a nation far removed from the one George Bush seems to fear…

Scott Ritter, Aljazeera/ICH, March 30, 2005
Sleepwalking to disaster in Iran

Persian Journal, June 9, 2005
U.S. favours Iran’s NPT exit

Scott Ritter, Aljazeera/ICH, June 19, 2005
The US war with Iran has already begun

Take a break and visitkargah.com
Iranian Artists’ site

…wonderful diversity, creativity and beauty

Michael Klare, TomDispatch
Oil, Geopolitics, and the coming war with Iran

Kaveh L Afrasiabi, Asia Times
The myth of an Israeli attack on Iran
Very interesting counterargument by Tehran political scientist

Ray Takeyh, International Herald Tribune
Europe is talking Iran around

Juan Cole, ICH
The Iraqi war is over, and the winner is…Iran

Michael Klare, The Nation
The Iran war build up

Julian Coman, News.Telegraph
Now America accuses Iran of complicity in World Trade Center attack

William R. Clark, ICH
Petrodollar warfare: Dollars, Euros and the upcoming Iranian Oil Bourse

Mike Whitney, ICH
Why Iran will lead to World War 3

Peter Grier. Chritian Science Monitor
Is a larger “nuke club” inevitable – Iran dares the West by restarting nuclear plant

FPIF, Foreign Policyin Focus, Aug 10
The Bush Administration and Iran’s New President

Thomas Fuller, International Herald Tribune
Iran rejcts UN nuclear concerns as ‘absurd’
See this too on why Iran does not accept EU ‘bullying’

IranMania.com
The main points of IAEA resolution on Iran’s N-plan

IranMania.com
IAEA adopts resolution on Iran’s nuke program

Siddharth Varadarajan, The Hindu, September 22, 2005
What the IAEA really found in Iran

Siddharth Varadarajan, The Hindu, September 23, 2005
The world must stand firm on diplomacy

Siddharth Varadarajan, The Hindu, September 21, 2005
Iran and the invention of a nuclear crisis

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...