Iraq Analyses: The resistance & the elections Plus human rights, WMDs, the occupation in a wider strategic perspective and the destruction of Babylon

Much valuable stuff is left unread or forgotten just because it was written some time ago and, thus, we may lose our sense of history and of a pattern or logics to what happens around us.
Each of the articles in this TFF Collection is relevant for an understanding of the conflict, the war and the occupation.
They are analyses, viewpoints and comments with lasting qualities; they should not be put in the archives before we have witnessed the end of this crisis. They offer perspectives on what to learn and what to remember when they build up the next crisis…

TFF produces Feature Collections to assist public awareness and education. You may search for more facts and analyses from these links. However, TFF accepts no responsibility for the content of these articles.

On the resistance to the occupation

Wikipedia – The Free Encyclopedia
The Iraqi resistance

M. Junaid Alam, CounterPunch
Do the Iraqis have a right to resist?

Samir Haddad and Mazin Ghazi, Al Zawra, Baghdad
An inventory of Iraqi resistance groups

Scott Ritter, Christian Science Monitor
Defining the resistance in Iraq – it’s not foreign and it’s well prepared

Tariq Ali, CounterPunch
All Talk of Meaningful Democracy has Faded
The Iraqi Resistance: a New Phase

Patrick Cockburn, The Independent & TruthOut
The crushing of Fallujah will not end the war in Iraq

Dan Murphy and Nicholas Blanford, Christian Science Monitor
Arab view dims on Iraq rebels
Insurgent tactics are drawing rebukes from the Arab world.

William S. Lind , AntiWar.com
Iraqi Resistance Shifts From Saddam to Allah

Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch.com
Which war is this anyway?
If you compare with how the media treated the resistance in Afghanistan and Chechenya, you’d ask yourself some questions about the language our media use, the invisibility of the victims, the rather few human rights reports and the use of the term terrorism…

Scott Peterson , Christian Science Monitor
For Iraq’s insurgents, what next?
Postelection Iraq leaves the militants facing a new dynamic – a population that has endorsed the political process.

Pepe Escobar, Asia Times
Why the US will not leave Iraq
If the Sunni resistance is really 200,000-strong, it is the resistance that will have the last word. Americans – but not the rest of the world – are still unable to understand why the resistance has become so powerful. Every faction has its own reasons. Ba’athists are longing to recapture their lost power. Salafists want Iraq to be part of the new caliphate. Moderate Sunnis want the restoration of Sunni rule – which has always been the rule in Iraq. Iraqi nationalists want to kick the foreigners out – like they did with the Mongols, the Ottomans and the British. That’s why the resistance is a relentless, ever-expandable proposition, but always under a unifying umbrella: to defeat the occupiers.

Sharon Smith, CounterPunch
The Anti-War Movement and the Iraqi Resistance

Phyllis Bennis, Institute for Policy Studies
The U.S. peace and justice movement facing 2005

Jihad Unspun
An insiders look at the Iraqi resistance

Before and after the January 30 elections

Dan Murphy , Christian Science Monitor
How Iraq’s election will work
Iraqis are preparing to vote in their first-ever free election on Sunday. The transitional government they choose will craft the country’s new constitution., of the Monitor’s Baghdad bureau, answers key questions about the process.

Phyllis Bennis, ZNet
Eve of elections talking points
The 100,000 thousand dead Iraqis, the 760,000 pounds of lethal explosives found but little noticed, the UN’s refusal to send additional elections experts – and this: “NY Newsday’s scoop regarding the effort by a group of Muslim countries, including Pakistan and several others, to provide a 1500-strong battalion specifically to provide protection to UN workers in Iraq in the run-up to the election. It was Washington who rejected the proposal, refusing to accept a military contingent under the direct command of the United Nations, not the Pentagon”…

Project on Defence Alternatives
The Iraqi election “bait and switch”: Faulty poll will not bring peace or US withdrawalGet TFF analyses, debate articles, site updatesand peace tips – free of charge

Ahmed Amrawi, Aljazeera.net
Validation through elections

Annia Ciezadlo , The Guardian
Iraq’s election wild card: Kirkuk
As Iraq’s Jan. 30 election nears, Kurds threaten a boycott unless the return of the city becomes an option. Kirkuk, the oil-rich city that Saddam Hussein “Arabized” through forced migration, is on the Iraqi side of the line separating the Kurdistan Regional Government from the rest of Iraq. The Kurdish vote will be crucial in the upcoming elections – they may well be the only Sunnis voting – and Kurdish leaders are seizing the political moment: They’re putting pressure on interim prime minister Iyad Allawi to reopen the explosive issue of rejoining Kirkuk to Kurdistan.

Rod Nordland, TruthOut & Newsweek
You’re voting for whom?
Iraq’s new political coalition is reluctant to release the names of its election candidates. But some surprising figures have been included – and left out.

Jon Lee Anderson, The New Yorker
Iyad Allawi: A man of shadows – profile
Can this appointed prime minister hold Iraq together?

Howard LaFranchi , Christian Science Monitor
How election reverberates beyond Iraq
Both Iraqi unity and global engagement may get a boost.

Ivan Eland, The Independent Institute
Are Iraqi elections a Panacea?
The Iraqi elections are unlikely to have a ripple effect in a region that is already cynical about U.S. motives. The overly hyped plebiscite will probably do no more to stanch the downward spiral of violence in Iraq and the deepening U.S. quagmire there than the killing of Saddam Hussein’s sons.

Noam Chomsky, International Relations Center
After the Election: The Future of Iraq and U.S. occupation

Robert Fisk , The Star & The Independent and Information Clearing House
Triumph and tragedy for Iraq
Low level of Sunni participation tarnishes success of large poll turnout 

Patrick Cockburn, The Independent
A victory for the Shia – but an occupying force will still be in power 

Salim Lone, International Herald Tribune
This election is a sham
Lone is former adviser to the UN in Iraq…

The occupation as part of a strategy for the Middle east

Joshua Micah Marshall, Washington Monthly – April 2003
Practice to deceive
Chaos in the Middle East is not the Bush hawks’ nighmare scenario – it is their plan. Early interesting insights into the thinking – at the time – of the neo-cons.

Stephen Zunes, Foreign Policy in Focus
The U.S. invasion of Iraq: The military side of globalization?

Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times
The strategy to secure Iraq did not foresee a 2nd war

TurkishPress.com
Iraq battling more than 200,000 insurgents: intelligence chief

Human rights

Colum Lynch, Washington Post
The UN refuses to assist Iraqis with war crimes trials

Dana Priest, Washington Post
Detainees secretely taken our of Iraq

Media Lens Alert
Iraqi child deaths
Media indifferent as UNICEF reports worsening catastrophe.

Ghali Hassan, CounterPunch
Iraq’s health care under the occupation
200 children die every day

Letter from the people of Fallujah to Kofi Annan

Scott Ritter, The Guardian
The War on Iraq has made moral cowards of us all
More than 100,000 Iraqis have died in the war – and where is our shame and rage?

Nina Berman, Purple Hearts
Picture and video.
Several thousand soldiers have been wounded in action in Iraq. Thousands of others have been injured in war related events. They have lost arms, legs, eyes, ears, pieces of their brains. Some will spend the rest of their lives in wheelchairs. These soldiers — all volunteer warriors – have returned home to heal their wounds and consider life, forever scarred and changed. – Nina Berman.

Naomi Klein , The Guardian
You asked for my evidence, Mr Ambassador. Here it is
In Iraq, the US does eliminate those who dare to count the dead.

Michael Hirsh and John Barry, Newsweek
‘The Salvador Option’
The Pentagon may put Special-Forces-led assassination or kidnapping teams in Iraq.

Weapons of Mass Destruction

Scott Ritter, Information Clearing House
If you had seen what I have seen
The inspection process was rigged to create uncertainty over WMD to bolster the US and UK’s case for war.

John Hughes, Christian Science Monitor
No WMD, but Saddam’s threat clear

Peter Grier & Faye Bowers, Christian Science Monitor
New details about Saddam Hussein, gleaned from the CIA.
Iraq’s dictator developed an aversion to using telephones and a penchant for writing novels as he sparred with the UN.

Matt Taibbi, New York Press
WMDUH!
Was the end of the WMD hunt last week actually ‘little noted’ or was it simply ‘little covered’?

Babylon – how could it be destroyed?

Wikipedia – the free encyclopedia
Babylon

BBC
Army base ‘has damaged Babylon’

BBC
US fears over Iraqi heritage site

Dahr Jamail’s Iraq Dispatches
Destroying Babylon

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...