Integration – How can we improve it for refugees and immigrants? What promotes and what hampers it?

Project Summary

A common project conducted by the municipality of Eslöv – a small town in Southern Sweden – Eslöv Apartments Inc., the Police in Eslöv, the Swedish Church, the Social Insurance Office, the Transnational Foundation (TFF), ERF – The European Refugee Fund (through the Swedish Integration Board and the Swedish Migration Board).

Project director: Christina Spännar from TFF.

The aims

The aim is to develop a model that can help mitigate the integration process for refugees, asylum seekers and other immigrants who knock on the door to Eslöv. The model shall be developed through partners in a network, i.e. an information and communication structure. On the one hand, there are the actors and authorities who receive the immigrants in a variety of functions; on the other, we will work with refugees who – through their experiences of the encounter with Swedish society – are able to give us images of what that encounter looks like from their side.

As an important part of the project, we want to encourage refugees to write down, or be interviewed about, their life stories and reflections. These women and men should be selected in terms of ethnic background, education, and age so they create a broad and many-facetted image of the process, its problems as well as joys. Similar thought and experiences will be drawn out of the discussion groups we will establish with youth in particular.

Some of the intellectual underpinnings of this project can be found in Christina Spännar’s doctoral dissertation in sociology from 2001, Med främmande baggage (With foreign luggage) that deals with a series of project-relevant issues. For more, see this TFF PressInfo.

About the first project phase of this immigration project, Christina says:

My idea was to try to connect the various actors who, in their work, meet the refugees and other immigrants with people who have their own experience of migration and integration. The purpose was to get an image of the other side of that encounter. Further, in order to learn more about how the encounter with the Swedish society is experienced, I wanted – through storytelling – to give a voice to about twenty refugees and other immigrants.

What promotes smooth integration?

Based on conversations, reflections, discussions and seminars I drew the conclusion that the following factors promote integration:

– Trustful relations. The trust and confidence in oneself and in others that human beings are capable of is one of the great driving forces of society. Curiosity and creativity is based on trust. Confidence permits us to dare do things. It develops through the interplay between us as human beings and citizens on the one hand and the world around us on the other.

– Dialogue. Dialogue is essential because it means mutuality and listening.

– Integration platforms or ‘warm places’ where people can meet and relations unfold. It is places where you can do things together, not the least things that do not require the spoken word – music, song, theatre and art – but anyhow implies creating something together.

– Acknowledgement of the general human needs for self-esteem and for being part of a community coupled with a sense of order and coherence, with meaning, in one’s life.

– The ability to see oneself through the eyes of others.

– Awareness of the fact that what is self-evident to me is not necessarily so to others.

– Continuity in initiatives and activities since continuity helps create coherence.

– Flexibility – since it permits us to take into consideration and care for the particular individual’s qualifications and needs.

All these factors have their place in the individual’s perspective.

What hampers integration?

Likewise, I concluded that the following factors hamper integration:

– The “we” and “them” thinking. It implies a generalisation based on the ‘foreign’ origin of the other.

– Structures that have been established to fit collectively generalizing views and integration procedures.

– Departmentalization – since it impedes co-operation and synergy.

– Ignorance about the real conditions in many of the countries from where the refugees and other immigrants come to Sweden.

– Coercion and constraints – which can only be experienced as humiliating. People who are being coerced tend to offer resistance in one or more ways. It is no more surprising than in the tale about how the wind and the sun competed about who would first make a man take off his coat…

Apart from all the work on the ground, seminars and discussions, these two publications came out of the first phase:

Christina Spännar
“Report from a year in Eslöv. Integration – what promotes and what hampers it?”
Introduction, background and wider context, participating authorities, the project’s development, a series of constructive proposals, proposal of a model and ending with selected conclusions and a postscript.
In Swedish only, pdf 504 KB, 104 pp, printed and in pdf format, December 2005.

Christina Spännar
“With roots in foreign lands. Twenty stories.”
It’s tough to leave everything behind, travel to a new country, encounter all its differences and to, finally, get to feel at home in the new country. This book gives voice to persons from Palestine, former Yugoslavia, various countries in the Middle East, Burundi, Hungary, former Soviet Union and from Latin America; they tell us about the many steps on that road and how they feel today and how they look back upon it.
In Swedish only, 4,9 MB; illustrated with the author’s photos from various countries. 96 pp, printed and in pdf format; December 2005.

Phase 2: 2006 –

This phase is conducted in close co-operation with TFF Associate Vibeke Bing. Vibeke is a social worker, lecturer and author. Organizations involved in addition to those in Phase 1: The Swedish Association of Family Centres and The Foundation “Allmänna Barnhuset” – The House of Children.”

“Frosty Feet”

It feels as if cold winds sweep over Sweden, in the face of children and youth with roots in foreign lands. The risk is that they will freeze in their development instead of running happily into a safe future.

The aims

The purpose of this phase is to try to implement some of the proposals that were presented by the participants in the first phase. We also intend to explore the qualifications and potentials of the Swedish family centrals to promote integration in the future.

– The planned work builds on the integration analysis and work that has been done in the municipality of Eslov in Southern Sweden and, similarly, in three family centrals in Malmö, another, larger municipality.

– Integration into the Swedish society is a societal, inter-human and inter-cultural process. One precondition for its success is mutually trustful relations and respect, the main tool is communication and the road to it must be paved by knowledge and education and, thereby, a solid understanding for the values and norms on both sides of the encounter. This should counterbalance generalisations and stereotypes as well as social border-creation and open more doors to dialogue and mutual learning.

– Human relations can be promoted where integration platforms and “warm places” exist. They offer safe physical spaces for meetings among people who have their roots in different countries and cultures; they provide opportunities for the development of trustful relations through dialogue. Dialoguing implies mutuality and active listening which, in turn, enhances the ability to see oneself through the other. If so, chances are that we all become more conscious of the fact that what is self-evident to me is not necessarily the same as what is self-evident to others.

– The creation of “warm places” must take place with many involved parties from a variety of social spheres, e.g. the municipalities, the region, the churches, cultural institutions, formal education and vocational training and the police. We shall try also to identify and involve whatever forces which could be helpful in improving the integration process but which remain underutilized or hidden resources today.

At present – summer 2006 – we are in the process of developing the grant application and identify additional partners.

One first activity is a conference with interested individuals and cooperation partners at Sätra Bruk, August 28-30, 2006.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...