Gandhi i Mumbai och Poona

Trettio välbeväpnade poliser arresterade 4 maj 1930 Gandhi där han utvunnit salt, i byn Karadhi nära Dandi. Han fördes till Yeravda-fängelset i Poona. Det var inte sista gången han kastades i fängelse i denna delen av Indien.

Mellan 1917 och 1932 var Mumbai/Bombay och Poona (4 timmars tågresa in i landet) viktiga platser på Gandhis långa fredsväg (liksom Ahmedabad). I Poona satt han också fången i Aga Khan-palatset, sedan han återvänt tomhänt ifrån förhandlingar i London och nyårsafton 1931-32 initierat en ickevåldskampanj för Oberoende. Vid midnatt 3-4 januari arresterade han på taket (där han sov) till sitt hus i Mumbai, vilket i dag är ett jättefint Gandhi-Museum – “Mani Bhavan” – på Liburnum Road nr 19.

Mani Bhavan, Liburnum Rd 19, Mumbai/Bombay – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

I Mumbai lärde han sig att spinna och dricka getmjölk. Han drog igång strejkar mot engelska lagar, startade en av sina många tidningar och jobbade som socialarbetare. 1934 beslöt han här att sluta betala medlemsavgift till Kongresspartiet och koncentrera sig på de kastlösas situation. 1942 inledde han på ett torg i Mumbai den allindiska “Lämna Indien”-kampanjen, riktad mot engelsmännen. För detta fängslades han 9 augusti åter och internerades i Aga Khan-palatset tillsammans med sin hustru Katurba och sin sekreterare och nära vän Mahadev Desai. Desai dog några dagar efter interneringen, Kasturba i Gandhis armar i februari 1944. Gandhi släpptes först 6 maj 1944.

Museet “Mani Bhavan” blir min oas, en underbar stor villa på en lugn väg i Mumbai, med 200-300 gäster per dag. Här finns en liten butik med Gandhi-frimärken och böcker men också ett bibliotek med 50.000 volymer, där besökande fritt kan läsa och låna. Här finns också ett forskningsinstitut med möteslokaler. Alla väggar är prydda med bilder, originaldokument, brev, fotos etc. – intimt, informativt, meditativt. Man kan gå ut på små balkonger och reflektera i skuggan från höga träd.

Biblioteket i Mani Bhavan – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

Gandhi själv levde på andra våningen och hans enkla arbetsrum ser ut ungefär som i Birla House i Delhi, men med ett par viktiga skillnader. Det finns nu en telefon! Dessutom finns det en oljetavla och en skulptur av Gandhi.

Mani Bhavan är ett måste på en färd i Gandhis fotspår.

Det är också Aga Khan-palatset i Poona, dock mindre välskött. Palats är dyra att underhålla och den indiska regeringen har skurit ned på bidragen till Gandhi-museerna. Gandhis rum är stort med ett elegant badrum och utsikt till en underbar park. Jag får känslan av hotell snarare än fängelse. Här finns också en minneslund för Kasturba och Desai.

Aga Khan-Palatset i Poona – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

Jag träffar Gandhi-aktivister och människor från stadens jesuitiska seminarium som har för avsikt att rusta upp palatset med möteslokal, föreläsningar, bibliotek och en ekologisk trädgård i parken.

När jag ändå är i Poona vill jag se Yeravda-fängelset, där Gandhi internerades flera gånger, liksom Nehru och Desai. Men det är stängt för allmänheten. Den av engelsmännen byggda fästningen hyser i dag 3400 fångar av alla slag. Lokala Gandhi-aktivister har suttit här för sina demonstrationer – senast under Clinton’s besök.

Jag knackar på fängelseporten tillsammans med Poonas enda fredsforskare, Delia Maria Thomas. Vi besöker olika delar av den fantastiska fängelsebyråkratin och får till slut ett papper med ett “ja”.

Vi förs till den pittoreska fängelsegården omgärdad av låga stugor, med ett gigantiskt mangoträd i mitten. Jag frågar skämtsamt om det är möjligt att bli internerad här några dagar eftersom det är så trevligt. Gården har sopats, allt är nymålat, färska blommor överallt.

Mangoträdet i fängelsegården – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

Mangoträdet är berömt. Engelskmännen hade 1932 föreslagit at Indiens konstitution skulle innehålla en positiv särbehandling av kastlösa: de skulle ha egna valmanskårer. Gandhi protesterade. Han ämnade “fasta till döds” mot förslaget liggande på en järnsäng under mangoträdet. Han såg frågan i religiösa och moraliska, inte politiska, termer. Nyordningen skulle skapa splittring mellan hinduer. Engelsmännen ville att de kastlösa skulle få ökat inflytande, men Gandhi ansåg att förslaget skulle cementera rollen som kastlös; kastväsendets avskaffande skulle därmed försvåras ytterligare. Den religiöse Gandhi önskade ett sekulariserad Indien, där alla behandlades rättfärdigt.

Konflikten löstes i “Yeravda-pakten” då den nästan döende Gandhi fick ledaren för de kastlösa med sig, Dr. Ambedkar. Indiens massor reste sig nu mot engelsmännen.

Gandhis cell i Yeravda-fängelset – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

Som vanligt såg Gandhi först till helhetens intressen. Han höll fast vid principen om att målet är summan av medlen.

Själv undrar jag vad Gandhi skulle ha tänkt om dagens minoritets- och mänskliga rättigheterspolitik sådan den praktiserats av Väst i Kosovo och Makedonien? Här finns vare sig hänsyn till helheten eller någon som gitter fasta emot den förljugna principlösheten.

Jan Öberg

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
Read More
JoGSS-Silent
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
Screenshot 2026-10-26 115647
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Screenshot 2026-10-15 141837
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...