PressInfo #67 – G8 Kosovo Principles – Another Peace Plan Fraud

“The G8 foreign ministers’ declaration of principles
to resolve the Kosovo “crisis” is a mishmash of face-saving
elements for the West and addresses none of the root causes
of the conflict or the failure of the West as a mediator,”
says TFF director Jan Oberg. “This declaration may be used
to justify continued bombing and, if implemented, promises a
very sad future for the Balkans. But ‘conflict illiteracy’
abounds, so leading media call it a peace plan – repeating
their treatment of Rambouillet.” Here follows the full G8
text of principles as published by BBC on May
6.
 

– – – – –

“The following general principles must be adopted and
implemented to resolve the Kosovo crisis: 

* Immediate and verifiable end of violence and repression
in Kosovo. 

* Withdrawal from Kosovo of military, police and
paramilitary forces. 

* Deployment in Kosovo of effective international civil
and security presences, endorsed and adopted by the United
Nations, capable of guaranteeing the achievement of the
common objectives. 

* The establishment of an interim administration for
Kosovo, to be decided by the Security Council of the United
Nations to ensure conditions for a peaceful and normal life
for all inhabitants for Kosovo. 

* The safe and free return of all refugees and displaced
persons and unimpeded access to Kosovo by humanitarian aid
organisations. 

* A political process towards the establishment of an
interim political framework. An agreement providing for
substantial self-government for Kosovo, taking full account
of the Rambouillet accords and the principles and
sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia and other countries of the region and
the demilitarisation of the UCK. 

* Comprehensive approach to the economic development and
stabilisation of the crisis region.”

– – – – – 

“Here are 10 reasons why this declaration can be seen as
another peace plan fraud: 

1. The ministers call this a “crisis” and not a
“conflict” or a “war.” That indicates that their purpose is
to create a face-saving formula for the crisis created by
NATO’s Balkan bombing blunder. People in
Yugoslavia (FRY), the Kosovars in particular and the
surrounding countries see it as a conflict that exploded in
war and aggression. The principles grasp none of the deep
roots of the conflict itself and focus on none of the needs
of the peoples living in the region. 

2. They avoid reference to NATO’s bombing and under what
conditions it would stop. 

3. The ministers begin with withdrawal of FRY forces
(which, all or some, from where to where?) and ends with a
general reference to (later) demilitarisation of the UCK
under the point “political process.” This continues the lack
of balance – introduced last year by ambassador Holbrooke –
in dealing with two fighting parties/forces in a civil
war. 

4. It does not state whether all or some FRY forces shall
be withdrawn. It mentions ‘demilitarization’ of UCK, but can
there be an Army without weapons? If so, is this an
endorsement of the KLA-dominated ‘government’ recently
formed outside the constitution and political framework of
Kosova? 

5. The ministers avoid defining the international
“presences;” but the wording ‘international civil and
security’ does represent an important move away from “NATO
alone” over “NATO lead” and “international security force
with a NATO core.” Good that the UN is, finally, to play a
role, but will it be as leader or as a hostage holding the
rubber stamp? 

6. Reference to the territorial integrity and sovereignty
of FRY is not enough. The declaration does not mention that
FRY shall be consulted about its own future. The UN Security
Council shall decide about an interim administration and the
interim political framework shall take full account of the
Rambouillet accords. But they violated the integrity and
sovereignty of FRY and were no ‘accords.’ 

7. The ministers seem to believe that it is an ‘interim
administration for Kosovo’ rather than a
socio-psychological, people-based peace-building process
which will bring peace to the region. This continues the
disastrous top-down ‘engineering’ or ‘managerial’ approach
to conflict where a shift to consultation, trust-building,
and regeneration of civil society is much needed. 

8. The declaration is most interesting for what it does
not say a word about, namely: a) local and regional trust-
and confidence-building, b) consulting with FRY and KLA/UCK
and Dr. Rugova, c) negotiations between the conflict’s core
parties, and d) a Balkan regional approach and
process. 

9. The ministers avoid mentioning any regret or apology
to the peoples of Yugoslavia for the civilian deaths and
damage caused – and thus fails pitifully to open the door to
reconciliation between NATO countries and the 10 million
citizens of FRY. Lacking both in self-criticism and empathy,
the G8 believes that NATO countries can get away with first
failing in violence-prevention, then in impartial mediation
and now in aggression and then become a trusted, legitimate
peacemaker! 

10. With so many crucial issues left out and so much
vagueness, FRY is likely to ask for clarifications or say no
– and then NATO can legitimate continued bombing of those
who say no to ‘peace principles.’ 

This document fails to open a single door to genuine
conflict-solution. It addresses neither the original roots
causes of the Albanian-Serb conflict, nor the much worse
regional and world crisis created by NATO’s disastrous
policies. 

The imprecisions, the omissions, the shortness, the
contradictions and the absence of any expression of empathy
with human suffering indicate the deep divisions among the
drafters. Russia is ‘on board’ this – if they are – only
because the West is more important to it than Kosovo. I
would be surprised if Yugoslavia perceives it as anything
but window-dressing. It is tragic that the most powerful
leaders have learnt no lessons about conflict-resolution. To
paraphrase Einstein, with NATO’s bombings since March 24,
everything has changed except the most powerful leaders’ way
of thinking about conflict and ‘peace’ and thus we drift
towards more catastrophes,” predicts Jan Oberg.

© TFF 1999

• You are welcome to re-print, copy, archive, quote
from or re-post this item, but please retain the source.

• TFF’s website has all the relevant links to Iraq,
the Balkans, including media there + peace research, and
non-violence

• Teacher, activist, journalist?? You’ll always find
something interesting at TFF.

• Get your daily global news from the leading media
on TFF’s site, all in one place.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...