PressInfo #67 – G8 Kosovo Principles – Another Peace Plan Fraud

“The G8 foreign ministers’ declaration of principles
to resolve the Kosovo “crisis” is a mishmash of face-saving
elements for the West and addresses none of the root causes
of the conflict or the failure of the West as a mediator,”
says TFF director Jan Oberg. “This declaration may be used
to justify continued bombing and, if implemented, promises a
very sad future for the Balkans. But ‘conflict illiteracy’
abounds, so leading media call it a peace plan – repeating
their treatment of Rambouillet.” Here follows the full G8
text of principles as published by BBC on May
6.
 

– – – – –

“The following general principles must be adopted and
implemented to resolve the Kosovo crisis: 

* Immediate and verifiable end of violence and repression
in Kosovo. 

* Withdrawal from Kosovo of military, police and
paramilitary forces. 

* Deployment in Kosovo of effective international civil
and security presences, endorsed and adopted by the United
Nations, capable of guaranteeing the achievement of the
common objectives. 

* The establishment of an interim administration for
Kosovo, to be decided by the Security Council of the United
Nations to ensure conditions for a peaceful and normal life
for all inhabitants for Kosovo. 

* The safe and free return of all refugees and displaced
persons and unimpeded access to Kosovo by humanitarian aid
organisations. 

* A political process towards the establishment of an
interim political framework. An agreement providing for
substantial self-government for Kosovo, taking full account
of the Rambouillet accords and the principles and
sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia and other countries of the region and
the demilitarisation of the UCK. 

* Comprehensive approach to the economic development and
stabilisation of the crisis region.”

– – – – – 

“Here are 10 reasons why this declaration can be seen as
another peace plan fraud: 

1. The ministers call this a “crisis” and not a
“conflict” or a “war.” That indicates that their purpose is
to create a face-saving formula for the crisis created by
NATO’s Balkan bombing blunder. People in
Yugoslavia (FRY), the Kosovars in particular and the
surrounding countries see it as a conflict that exploded in
war and aggression. The principles grasp none of the deep
roots of the conflict itself and focus on none of the needs
of the peoples living in the region. 

2. They avoid reference to NATO’s bombing and under what
conditions it would stop. 

3. The ministers begin with withdrawal of FRY forces
(which, all or some, from where to where?) and ends with a
general reference to (later) demilitarisation of the UCK
under the point “political process.” This continues the lack
of balance – introduced last year by ambassador Holbrooke –
in dealing with two fighting parties/forces in a civil
war. 

4. It does not state whether all or some FRY forces shall
be withdrawn. It mentions ‘demilitarization’ of UCK, but can
there be an Army without weapons? If so, is this an
endorsement of the KLA-dominated ‘government’ recently
formed outside the constitution and political framework of
Kosova? 

5. The ministers avoid defining the international
“presences;” but the wording ‘international civil and
security’ does represent an important move away from “NATO
alone” over “NATO lead” and “international security force
with a NATO core.” Good that the UN is, finally, to play a
role, but will it be as leader or as a hostage holding the
rubber stamp? 

6. Reference to the territorial integrity and sovereignty
of FRY is not enough. The declaration does not mention that
FRY shall be consulted about its own future. The UN Security
Council shall decide about an interim administration and the
interim political framework shall take full account of the
Rambouillet accords. But they violated the integrity and
sovereignty of FRY and were no ‘accords.’ 

7. The ministers seem to believe that it is an ‘interim
administration for Kosovo’ rather than a
socio-psychological, people-based peace-building process
which will bring peace to the region. This continues the
disastrous top-down ‘engineering’ or ‘managerial’ approach
to conflict where a shift to consultation, trust-building,
and regeneration of civil society is much needed. 

8. The declaration is most interesting for what it does
not say a word about, namely: a) local and regional trust-
and confidence-building, b) consulting with FRY and KLA/UCK
and Dr. Rugova, c) negotiations between the conflict’s core
parties, and d) a Balkan regional approach and
process. 

9. The ministers avoid mentioning any regret or apology
to the peoples of Yugoslavia for the civilian deaths and
damage caused – and thus fails pitifully to open the door to
reconciliation between NATO countries and the 10 million
citizens of FRY. Lacking both in self-criticism and empathy,
the G8 believes that NATO countries can get away with first
failing in violence-prevention, then in impartial mediation
and now in aggression and then become a trusted, legitimate
peacemaker! 

10. With so many crucial issues left out and so much
vagueness, FRY is likely to ask for clarifications or say no
– and then NATO can legitimate continued bombing of those
who say no to ‘peace principles.’ 

This document fails to open a single door to genuine
conflict-solution. It addresses neither the original roots
causes of the Albanian-Serb conflict, nor the much worse
regional and world crisis created by NATO’s disastrous
policies. 

The imprecisions, the omissions, the shortness, the
contradictions and the absence of any expression of empathy
with human suffering indicate the deep divisions among the
drafters. Russia is ‘on board’ this – if they are – only
because the West is more important to it than Kosovo. I
would be surprised if Yugoslavia perceives it as anything
but window-dressing. It is tragic that the most powerful
leaders have learnt no lessons about conflict-resolution. To
paraphrase Einstein, with NATO’s bombings since March 24,
everything has changed except the most powerful leaders’ way
of thinking about conflict and ‘peace’ and thus we drift
towards more catastrophes,” predicts Jan Oberg.

© TFF 1999

• You are welcome to re-print, copy, archive, quote
from or re-post this item, but please retain the source.

• TFF’s website has all the relevant links to Iraq,
the Balkans, including media there + peace research, and
non-violence

• Teacher, activist, journalist?? You’ll always find
something interesting at TFF.

• Get your daily global news from the leading media
on TFF’s site, all in one place.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Read More
Screenshot 2026-10-26 115647
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Screenshot 2026-10-15 141837
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
images-2
Advocates of nuclear disarmament are regularly dismissed by the champions of nuclear deterrence as naïve and unrealistic, utopian or even irresponsible. Yet this ‘doctrine’ of deterrence, regarded by France as the ‘cornerstone’ of its national security, is based on quasi-religious beliefs, a theory that cannot be proven, risky gambles and fragile assumptions. So much so that one might legitimately ask which side the ‘Care Bears’ are on. Marc FinaudVice-President of Initiatives for Nuclear Disarmament (IDN) October 9, 2026 This article was originally published on Pressenza When it comes to these things being treated as religious concepts, look here. Idealists and realists It was Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand’s former Foreign Minister, who repeatedly coined the phrase: ‘Europeans are a sort of Care Bears who don’t realise they’re living in Jurassic Park’. He applies this reference to the cartoon for well-behaved children not only to what he regards as weakness or idealism...