China’s comparative advantage in knowledge about the West

Jan Oberg

Shanghai, China, September 16, 2024

When travelling around China, one of many things to note is that the Chinese are very positive toward the West, make use of Western inspirations, and know much more about the West than Westerners know about China.
This is quite remarkable because, historically, China has been the object of ruthless Western colonialism and warfare as well as racism—e.g. the ”yellow fewer/danger” syndrome—while China has done nothing similar to the West.

Here are some examples, big and small, of the mentioned knowledge and fascination of the West:

• Many young Chinese have chosen to have a Western name, like, say, Alison or Kevin. They say it is difficult for us in the West to remember and pronounce Chinese names.

• The Chinese know all the Western brands and gladly call their products something related to the West. They love to play with English when giving their company or shop a name like. One of the popular cars is BYD: Build Your Dreams, which is written in capital letters across the car’s luggage compartment.

• Wealthy people find it essential to drive Western luxury cars – BMW, Porsche, or even a Rolls Royce.

• Contrary to just 40 years ago, the Chinese dress like us, and most T-shirts reference London or New York or an English slogan across the chest. You can buy clothes, shoes, perfumes, etc. from every Western brand here.

• Chinese advertising is full of female and male faces that look more Western than Chinese. – like “buy our product and you’ll look more Western.”

• There is lots of Western music here in China – walk into any bar, and you’ll hear mellow jazz and a lot of Chinese pop is inspired by the West. The Chinese love Western classical music, don’t be surprised to hear Beethoven being played in the background of a department store. Or think of Lang Lang.

• There will invariably be a series of Hollywood films and blockbusters on Chinese flight entertainment programs.

• The larger museums contain Chinese art or historical relics, but there is a consistent policy of also giving the Chinese an opportunity to acquaint themselves with Western art, not least European artists.

• Just a few decades ago, the Chinese would drink tea only, but now it is fine to drink coffee and enjoy a cake with it. Any hotel breakfast will serve bacon, eggs, and other continental breakfast items. (Although you will still hardly ever see cheese.)

• Many more Chinese speak English, at least some English, than Westerners speak Chinese.

All the Western brands are here…

• All road signs and place names in the street and metros will also be written in English – you’ll never find yourself lost because you do not read the Chinese signs.

• The Chinese do not seek conflict. If you visit a company which is an object of Western economic sanctions and has paid a price for them, it seems impossible to make the leaders of it express any negative attitude. They will avoid the question or perhaps give you a quote from President Xi Jinping about harmony and hard work to achieve better results from one year to the next. An imam I conversed with in Xinjiang answered by stating that there would, over time, develop a better mutual understanding – seemingly unable to see the US accusation about genocide as anything but a sign of lack of knowledge, not as an accusation. Trying to achieve some kind of harmony and balance is essential for the Chinese way of thinking.

• Wherever you go in China, there is a positive attitude to you as a visitor. You are not being associated with the hostile West; you are seen and treated as a friend. They distinguish between the Western citizen and the Western governments, and you never feel guilty by association – in contrast to what many Chinese often feel in the West. And, by the way, you feel and are safe everywhere, night and day.

• Believe it or not, Ren Zhengfei, the founder of the Shenzhen-based Huawei company – one of the world’s most successful – has built a large French-German-style village as a campus inside which the researchers work. He has also built a classic-style library with a cupola that contains no less than 70,000 books – many of which are art, philosophy, science, etc, books from the West – for instance, David Hockney’s macro volumes on art. He is simply fascinated by what he has seen in Europe. At Fudan University in the outskirts of Shanghai, I met a scholar who was a specialist on Marxism whose entire office and seminar room was devoted to Western philosophy. And somewhere, a bookstore calls itself the Goethe Bookstore.

A section of one of Huawei’s research campuses in Shenzhen, China. It also runs a hotel with 3000 beds for visitors, part-time scholars and others the company interacts with.

• Thousands upon thousands of young Chinese have studied or are studying in the West. But how many Western students have gone to China? The majority of media people I have met here have, at some point, been studying in the US or England. They can compare Western and Eastern ways of thinking – and censorship. The same goes for many Chinese scholars, academics and artists: they have acquainted themselves with the West and been inspired by it – admire it. They know the West in ways few Westerners know China.

• China has imported so much from the West – including Marxism, capitalism, consumerism, Western culture, lifestyle and ways of doing things. It’s been consistently curious about the West and eclectically combined elements of socio-economic development into a synergetic whole. It has assimilated, emulated and adapted with curiosity. Forty years ago, its streets were filled with bicycles, today’s Beijing has 6 million cars, many more innovative than those produced by the West.

• When you read Chinese media, you’ll find much more news, features and videos about what happens in the West than you’ll find news about China – and other non-Western countries – in Western mainstream media. Lots of the best Chinese media have employed Westerners as anchors, columnists and documentarists.

What I am getting at here is that the West has a lot of homework to do regarding China. The generally negative attitude toward China in our media, research, and politics does not stem from China but from the West itself.

The negativity is proportionate to the ignorance: Grosso modo, Westerners are woefully ignorant about China and have always been. It seems OK to see China as a threat, a dictatorship, as authoritarian, as human rights violating, etc., without knowing a thing about China or the Chinese people’s ways of thinking – or without ever having visited it.

Furthermore, China is judged on Western criteria, not its own criteria and achievements. Western mainstream media predominantly do a disservice to the public, and most recently, the US passed a law that sets off US$ 1600 million over five years to ensure that there are only China-negative stories in our media. How weak the West has become – and how sad for someone who used to champion free media and free opinion-formation. For more, please consult TFF’s comprehensive analyses in the “Smokescreen Report” and follow our new anthology in the making “If You Want To Understand China”.

Interestingly, Westerners who have visited China as tourists or have worked in and with China as business people, scholars, etc., generally have a much more balanced view of China and the Chinese people.

Regrettably, it is much easier to project a generally negative image of China and its people when Westerners know little or nothing about them. Should the Chinese leadership wish to create a similarly negative image of the West in the Chinese mind, it would have to work hard—if at all possible.

Fortunately, there is no sign that they aim to do that. Every speech by China’s leaders emphasises the benefits of cooperation with the West while also stressing that China has a right to develop its own society and future the way it sees fit. It is not going to become anything like the West – and that is good for diversity and global creativity.

The world is not getting richer from one system, no matter which, trying to dominate all others. It will be richer by many different actors working together in multiple ways and inspiring each other – achieving synergy and change. Unity in diversity, not in uniformity.

The West’s problem is that, for centuries, it has seen itself as the leader, as # 1. Those who do that in any system tend to see themselves as teachers, not as learners because they believe they are operating on a higher civilisational level and/or have ”better” values that deserve to be universalised.

In summary, it is high time that the West recognises that it has homework to do – and begins to do it today rather than tomorrow.

China’s development since opening up to the world in 1978—its betterment of people’s living conditions—is unique in human history. It has not only made China a much better place but it has also made a great contribution to humanity’s development and welfare and continues to do so with visionary projects such as the Belt and Road Initiative, BRI.

The Chinese would be the last to tell you that everything is perfect in China. However, their only constants are change and striving to do things better today than yesterday. China deserves a decent, fair analysis based on knowledge and respect for its culture and civilisation instead of government-manufactured negative narratives rooted in deep ignorance.

“Porsche And Biker” – 2019 © Jan Oberg

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...