Amnesty International reaches deep into Africa’s people

LONDON – We arrived at the king’s palace – not much more that a dilapidated corrugated iron-built structure- on the edge of the small town of Oyo, capital of the Yoruba kingdom that used to extend in pre-British days half way across the width of southern Nigeria and into Benin. Today, although it contains over 30 million people, it is a poor shadow of its former glory- power and wealth passed long ago to the bourgeoisie and- for a long period- to the army.

There was a salute by toothless old men, dressed in black, firing home made muskets. A succession of elderly men and women came and prostrated themselves full length before the king. A child dressed as an African carved doll danced. Pierre Sane, Amnesty International’s Secretary-General, dressed in the russet red robes of an honoury chief, knelt before the king who called him “one of the illustrious sons of Africa”. Then it was Sane’s turn to speak. The crowd of about 2,000 pressed closer to hear. “Amnesty International has reached deep into the heart of Africa”, he said, “deep beyond the cities of Africa, deep beyond the politicians of Africa, deep into the people of Africa.”

That indeed is the conclusion I’ve reached myself. An organization begun only 40 years ago by a Catholic English lawyer now has a million members around the world and is known- and appreciated- even in the back of beyond in darkest Africa.

For a week I have been accompanying around Nigeria a high level mission of Amnesty led by Mr Sane. Two days before, we arrived in Kaduna, the capital of the northern state of the same name. We drove along the burnt out streets- homes, small workshops, mosques and churches, almost side by side, gutted and charred. We climbed the steps up to the top floor of an old ramshackle building housing the Kaduna branch of Amnesty. Outside in the limp heat hung a banner with the Pepsi slogan affixed. “Kaduna Amnesty welcomes Pierre Sane”, it read. An elderly lady walked me to the balcony. “You see those large patches of discoloured tar on the road. That’s where they built bonfires and burnt people alive.” Christians and Muslims rioted in February and May over the planned introduction of traditional Islamic Sharia law. Perhaps as many as 1,000 people died.

Sane addressed a meeting of the local non-governmental organizations. The room was crowded and everyone wanted the chance to speak. Amazingly, nearly everyone was brief and to the point.

“The purpose of this meeting is quite enormous ” intoned the chairman in the heavy cadences of Nigerian English. “People have been burnt out and don’t have the where-with-all to rebuild. The state should compensate them”, said the first speaker. A Muslim from the Inter-Faith Mediation Centre said, “We Nigerians are notoriously religious. For most of the time, however, we respect each other. A few people used this freedom we have under democracy to stir things up.” “Why doesn’t the governor sweep the town for arms?” asked another. “After the Biafran war they went house to house and confiscated every gun and every bullet.”

We headed for the governor’s office. He is a Muslim, of course, and perhaps a tolerant man- there had been no effort to erase the graffiti scribbled on the outside of his office wall: “Sir, sorry to say, “NO” to Sharia”. We were ushered into a large conference room with microphones. Sane did a succinct job of summarising the criticisms of the non-governmental organisations and the governor an equally effective and swift job of rebutting them. “I was glad to see no nation, large as well as small, escaped criticism in your annual report- I saw it discussed on CNN”, the governor began. “We are introducing a form of neighborhood watch- drawn from various interest groups in each neighborhood. We’ll investigate that the nominees are responsible characters and then we’ll give them a monthly allowance. But we want them to be responsible not just for security but for the environment too.” Then he went on down through Sane’s check list: compensation- no but assistance; arms- we are looking for them; sharia- we can’t solve problems by fighting. We have to have a civilized dialogue.”

A couple of days before we had been in the office of President Olusegun Obasanjo, elected in a hotly contested election sixteen months ago. Obasanjo had been jailed by the military dictator, Sani Abacha, and Amnesty had campaigned vigorously for his release. In London he had paid a visit to Amnesty’s offices to say thank you. Yet, for all the warmth, it was not an easy meeting. Sane and his associates from the Nigerian branch of Amnesty had some tough things to say: “Why did the soldiers open fire during a protest in the Niger Delta? Why are women so dreadfully abused in prison. Why do the police still engage in extra-judicial executions of suspected criminals? Why is the death penalty still enforced?” Then for an hour Obasanjo took the bat and the ball, he ran, hit, ducked, lowered his voice, raised it, told anecdotes, knocked away any suggestions the Amnesty team made for review, reprimand or change, although, to be fair, he told them if they hear of any prisons where they practice torture to pass the information on to him.

On the crucial issue of the behaviour of the army he was, as Sane told him, “thinking as a soldier. You have to think of the morale of the army, yes, but you also have to think about the wrong things the army does.” “Have you ever been shot at, Pierre?”, countered the president, who in the war in Biafra thirty years ago was shot at many times. Sane shook his head modestly, although I know his life has been threatened a number of times. “Unfortunately”, joshed Obasanjo”, there’s nowhere here where we can send Pierre to be shot!”

The truth is the change for the better under Obasanjo is the difference between night and day. People feel free. Political discourse is open and vigorously so. No one is incarcerated for their political opinions. Amnesty has been an important part of that change and remains an important player in the changes that have to come if Nigeria is going to take its place, as Obasanjo desires, at the top table of the world’s most important democracies.

I can be reached by phone on +44385 351172 or by e-mail:JonatPower@aol.com

Foreign affairs columnist, film-maker and author

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
Read More
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...
images-2
Advocates of nuclear disarmament are regularly dismissed by the champions of nuclear deterrence as naïve and unrealistic, utopian or even irresponsible. Yet this ‘doctrine’ of deterrence, regarded by France as the ‘cornerstone’ of its national security, is based on quasi-religious beliefs, a theory that cannot be proven, risky gambles and fragile assumptions. So much so that one might legitimately ask which side the ‘Care Bears’ are on. Marc FinaudVice-President of Initiatives for Nuclear Disarmament (IDN) October 9, 2026 This article was originally published on Pressenza When it comes to these things being treated as religious concepts, look here. Idealists and realists It was Hubert Védrine, François Mitterrand’s former Foreign Minister, who repeatedly coined the phrase: ‘Europeans are a sort of Care Bears who don’t realise they’re living in Jurassic Park’. He applies this reference to the cartoon for well-behaved children not only to what he regards as weakness or idealism...
8824b09f-33a5-43f9-9fd0-550f28cda24d_1536x1024
What the West Borrowed from Asia and What It Left Behind Jan Krikke October 8, 2026 The article was originally published here In the late 1960s, the musical Hair announced that the Age of Aquarius was dawning. Its opening anthem promised a transformation of human consciousness: an era of peace, harmony and understanding. Half a century later, a familiar echo of that promise is a meditation app offered by your employer. You can find it in the same list of benefits as the pension plan and the gym discount. How did a spiritual revolution become an employee benefit? The answer lies in the history of the movement known as New Age: where it came from, what it borrowed from Asia, and why the meaning of what it borrowed changed in the process. Two definitions will help. New Age is a loose label for a wide range of spiritual practices and...
Screenshot 2026-10-04 210142
Small and different + among the 10% most active + 9,000 texts + 150 Associates + 60 000 a day — and a stubborn belief that peace is smarter and must be secured by peaceful means. In 2026, the Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research (TFF) turns 40. On Monday, October 5, 2026, a new TFF homepage will go live — a new gateway to more than 9,000 articles, analyses, research papers and other contributions produced over four decades of independent peace research. But this is not simply a new website. For four decades, TFF has worked from a simple conviction: peace is smarter than militarism and can be brought about by peaceful means. This is not merely an aspiration. It is the principle expressed in the UN Charter and the Gandhian tradition that has guided our work from the beginning. TFF is a research-based, independent and people-financed foundation....