By Shastri Ramachandaran, Times of India 

April 2, 2002 

STOCKHOLM – “Are you not afraid? Is there no fear in India and among Indians after the September 11 attack on the United States?”

This was a recurrent question posed by friends, journalists, travelling companions and acquaintances during my 13-day sojourn from Copenhagen, through Malmo, Lund and Kalmar to Stockholm. The questions came from Danes, Swedes, Norwegians, Hungarians, Austrians, Pakistanis and, of course, Indians also living in these parts.

Invariably, I would burst in to a laugh that provoked them to insistently ask: “But aren’t you frightened with all this terrorism?” I get serious and say that there are few terrors for me as an Indian, at home or abroad. Their perplexed expressions and the expectant silence oblige me to explain that you can die for a million reasons in India; it does not have to be terrorism or bombs alone; and you don’t have to be working in the WTC or the Pentagon.

They still don’t take me seriously. So I have to get even more literal. Here are the other causes and conditions, big and small, of which you can perish in India.

You can disappear in to the ground beneath your feet in an earthquake of the kind that shook Gujarat in January this year or suffocate to death under the rubble. You can be swept away in the cyclone that struck the south-eastern state of Orissa months before the Gujarat disaster. If you survived these two calamities you could still be claimed by famine in Orissa because you cannot subsist on mango kernels or die of starvation even as the granaries are overflowing with unsold stock of rice and wheat.

You can die in riots and demonstrations over disputes about places of worship or even demolition of a mosque. You can die in riots and agitation over language policy, sharing of inter-state river waters, clashes between castes, conflict between communities or even in any democratic protest or strike action. The trigger for violent clashes can be linguistic, religious, ethnic, issues of development, rights of the poor, demands for wage hikes, traditional rights of forest-dwellers and tribes, policies of affirmative action or reverse discrimination, boothcapturing during elections, landless agricultural labour asking for minimum wages, Maoist struggles. You don’t even have to be a participant. You may just happen to be near the scene, passing by, working or living there. Or merely within firing distance of the man who shoots, and not always as a part of police action.

You can die of drinking illicit hooch, as over 40 poor people did in Noida, adjoining Delhi, in the third week of October. You can get sucked in to the gap of a faulty escalator, like a child was at the international airport. You could be on a hijacked plane, like the newly-wed man who was separated from his bride and killed in Kandahar after the plane was taken from Kathmandu. You can die in gang wars of the Mumbai underworld or terrorist attacks in Jammu and Kashmir; and Punjab, and at one time in Tamil Nadu thanks to the LTTE. You can also meet your end at the hands of the forest brigand Veerappan or the police forces in hot pursuit of him.

You can die of environmental pollution or as a result of faulty implementation of policies for a cleaner fuel -like buses retro-fitted with compressed natural gas equipment exploding or catching fire. Children could die because the school bus drivers are rash and negligent -many are crushed under the vehicles while alighting or boarding or the bus simply falls of a bridge as it did, taking some 50 children with it in to the river. Commuters can get knifed by goons in Delhi buses. Businessmen and their children get kidnapped for ransom and extortion, and killed regardless of whether they pay up or don’t. Children can die slow deaths as labour in hazardous industries like match factories.

You can die of starvation, destitution, deprivation, street violence, plain poverty, traffic accidents. You can die in the cold waves during winter, heat waves in summer or in the monsoon floods or building collapses. Or be snatched by a jungle cat from a fortified bus while driving through a wild life park, as happened in Bangalore some years ago. You can breathe your last in a hospital too because the wrong organ was operated or removed, or some surgical implement was left within you before being stitched up.

Death comes easily. It is not only living but also life that is cheap in India. And death is not always dramatic. The annual cycle of epidemics only increase the toll taken by air and water-borne diseases and various communicable, infections and contagious diseases.

There are a million terrors to survive daily and with every bout of survival, fear dies. People cannot afford fear if they want to get on with the business of living. Osama bin Laden or bombs falling off-target from US planes are just one more in a list that cannot even be numbered.

A nuclear apocalypse is too remote for those who survive such daily terrors. So, when countries like Sweden and Denmark cut off development assistance after the nuclear tests in 1998, people simply laughed. Now when they are back on track to resume development cooperation, people still laugh. The government that was sought to be isolated for the nuclear tests is now on the threshold of a new arms race. But never mind.

We took the lead from Washington for cutting off assistance and now we take the lead from Washington lifting sanctions to resume development cooperation, is the cynical approach.

Even as the development cooperators come, on a parallel track are those peddling arms, from the Danish defence ministry or Bofors salesmen from Sweden.

What is development cooperation about anyway, might well ask those who brave terrors other than the kind of terrorism that has struck America. About democracy, electoral assistance, human rights, environmental protection – all instruments of foreign policy and trade for the rich industrialised nations. Now even aid and relief organisations have been reduced to an adjunct of war, as in Afghanistan.

Can development cooperation in some way make exploitative governments, and corporatised, careerist NGOs, in the third world take a few steps towards survival issues: food, safe drinking water, primary health care, education, shelter, public transport and livelihood?

Security in this part of the world means much more than a nuclearised NATO umbrella or freedom from fear of nuclear weapons. There are just to many other commonplace terrors to be terrified of one kind of terrorism alone.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...