Joint Statement of Albanian and Serb Leaders of Kosovo

July 2, 1999

In Pristina, the UN Secretary-General’s acting Special Representative, Sergio Vieira de Mello, called together leaders of the Albanian and Serbian communities to focus exclusively on the pressing issue of security for all people in Kosovo. This is the first time that Albanian and Serb leaders of Kosovo have sat down to discuss concrete issues. They issued a joint statement calling for restraint and respect for human life, which was broadcast on radio and television by the United Nations mission in Kosovo. 

The text of the statement is as follows:

“Today, we have met at the headquarters of the UN Mission in Kosovo to urgently address a problem that affects all the people of Kosovo: people who want to return to their homes here, people who want to stay here, people who have returned in the past few weeks, people who have remained here throughout recent tragic months.

We have met to discuss security and human rights; in order for the human rights of all people to be exercised they must be free of fear. They must feel safe staying in their homes, going to their jobs, going to their places of worship, visiting friends and family, taking their exams at university, and going about all the other tasks of everyday life.

We know that we have to urgently address this problem if we want to realise our joint goal of a civil society in Kosovo, a society where no one has to have fear for his lie, his family, his job, or his home just because of his ethnicity or belief. We are determined not to look back but to look forward. In this respect we reach out to all national communities living in Kosovo. In particular, we want to stop the exodus of Serb, Montenegrin and other civilians from Kosovo and encourage the return of those who have already left.

We have a rich common heritage. We want to preserve it. We therefore call on everyone: stay in and come back to Kosovo. KFOR and UNMIK have promised us that they would do their utmost to secure your safety and to guarantee your future in your homeland. We trust them and we urge you to do likewise.

Both sides condemn the crimes of the Milosevic regime in Kosovo.

Persons suspected of war crimes and crimes against humanity shall be brought to justice. We support the role of ICTY. Peace can only be built on justice, not on revenge.

We urge all Kosovo inhabitants, whether of civilian or military status, to refrain and to actively discourage others from any acts of violence against their neighbours. Such actions are unacceptable. Those responsible will be brought to justice.

We insist that the identity of all prisoners that have been transferred to prisons outside Kosovo be made public and that they are immediately returned to Kosovo to be handed over to UNMIK to be tried or released as appropriate. We insist that political proceedings now being held in Serbian courts cease. We insist that all political prisoners be released immediately. We also insist that all People that are missing be also immediately handed over to UNMIK. We support the joint efforts already undertaken by human rights activists in the Albanian, Serb and other communities, together with UNMIK and other nternational organizations, to realise these demands.

The road to reconciliation will be long and difficult. There is no suchthing as natural hatred among people in Kosovo.

We have to work together. As first steps we have agreed today:

– to establish a joint immediate line of communication among ourselves, UNMIK and KFOR and to hold regular meetings such as today’s;

– to issue joint messages of cooperation and reconciliation on TV and radio;

-to establish a joint crisis task force, together with UNMIK and KFOR, to be able to quickly address security problems whenever they occur including in and around historical and religious sites and to organize an early meeting among religious and spiritual leaders to call for tolerance and respect for religious sites;

– and to establish, with the help of UNMIK and KFOR, local joint committees involving different national communities to devise concrete pilot projects to promote the gradual return of all people to their homes, starting with Mitrovica and Gnijlane which can then be extended to other areas.”

End

The statement was signed on the Kosovo Albanian side by Kol Berisha (L), Rexhep Qosja (LBD), Blerim Shala (Independent) and Hashim Thaci (UCK), and for the Kosovo Serbs by Bishop Artemije and Father Sava of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Kosovo, along with Dushan Ristic and Momcilo Trajkovic for the Serbian Resistance Movement.

————————-SERBIAN VERSION:————————-

MISIJA UJEDINJENIH NACIJA NA KOSOVU (UNMIK)

ZAJEDNICKA IZJAVA PREDSTAVNIKA KOSOVSKIH ALBA-NACA I KOSOVSKIH SRBA PODPOKROVITELJSTVOM UNMIK-a i KFOR-a

Sastali smo se danas u glavnoj kancelariji Misije UN na Kosovu da bismo hitno raz-motrili problem koji se tice svih ljudi na Kosovu: ljudi koji zele da se vrate svojim domovima ovde, ljudi koji zele ovde da ostanu, ljudi koji su se vratili u poslednjih nekoliko nedelja, ljudi koji su ostali ovde svo vreme u toku poslednjih tragicnih meseci.

Sastali smo se da prodiskutujemo o pitanjima bezbednosti i ljudskih prava. Ukoliko zelimo da se ostvaruju ljudska prava svih ljudi, oni se moraju osloboditi straha. Oni se moraju osecati sigurnim da ostanu u svojim domovima, da odlaze na svoja radna mesta, posecuju mesta bogosluzenja, posecuju prijatelje i porodicu, polazu ispite na Univerzitetu i obavljaju sve ostale poslove iz svakodnevnog zivota.

Mi smo svesni da hitno moramo razmotriti ovaj problem ukoliko zelimo da postignemo nas zajednicki cilj, a to je civilno drustvo na Kosovu, drustvo u kome se niko ne treba plasiti za svoj zivot, svoju porodicu, svoj posao ili za svoju kucu samo zbog svoje etnicke pripadnosti ili verovanja. Mi smo odlucni da ne gledamo iza sebe vec pravo napred. Zato smo spremni na saradnju sa svim nacionalnim zajednicama koje zive na Kosovu. Posebno zelimo da zaustavimo egzodus Srba, Crnogoraca i drugih civila sa Kosova i da ohrabrimo one koji su vec napustili Kosovo da se vrate.

Mi imamo bogatu zajednicku bastinu i zelimo da je sacuvamo. Zato svima upucujemo poziv: ostanite i vratite se na Kosovo. KFOR i UNMIK su nam obecali da ce oni uciniti najvise sto mogu da osiguraju vasu bezbednost i garantuju vam buducnost u vasoj otaxbini. Mi im verujemo i molimo vas da i vi ucinite isto.

Obe strane osudjuju zlocine Milosevicevog rezima na Kosovu.

Osobe koje su osum-njicene za ratne zlocine i zlocine protiv covecnosti bice izvedene pred lice pravde. Mi podrzavamo ulogu Medjunarodnog tribunala za ratne zlocine. Mir se jedino moze graditi na pravdi, a ne na osveti.

Zbog toga molimo sve stanovnike Kosova, bez obzira na njihov status, civile ili vojnike, da se uzdrze od nasilja i da aktivno odvracaju ostale od svih nedela protiv svojih komsija. Takvo ponasanje je nedopustivo. Odgovorni ce biti dovedeni pred lice pravde.

Insistiramo da se javno objavi identitet svih zatvorenika koji su prebaceni u zatvore van Kosova i da se oni odmah vrate na Kosovo, gde ce biti predani UNMIK-u, da bi zbog onoga sto su ucinili bili osudjeni ili oslobodjeni. Insistiramo da se politicki procesi koji se sada vode u srpskim sudovima odmah obustave i da se svi politicki zatvorenici odmah oslobode. Takodje insistiramo da se svi nestali odmah predaju predstavnicima UNMIK-a. Mi podrzavamo zajednicke napore aktivista za zastitu ljudskih prava u albanskim, srpskim i ostalim zajednicama, uz saradnju sa UNMIK-om i ostalim medjunarodnim organizacijama, na ostvarenju ovih zahteva.

Put ka pomirenju ce biti dug i tezak. Ne postoji prirodno stanje mrznje medju ljudima na Kosovu.

Moramo da radimo zajedno. Kao prvi korak mi smo se danas slozili:

– da uspostavimo zajednicku direktnu liniju komunikacije izmedju nas, UN-MIK-a i KFOR-a i da odrzavamo redovne sastanke kao sto je danasnji, – da objavljujemo zajednicke poruke saradnje i pomirenja na TV i radiju,

– da osnujemo zajednicki Krizni komitet, zajedno sa UNMIK-om i KFOR-om kako bi hitno mogli da reagujemo na sve bezbednosne probleme u bilo kom momentu, ukljucujuci one koji se odnose na istorijske i verske objekate, kao i da organizujemo, sto je pre moguce, sastanak verskih i duhovnih vodja koji bi pozvali na toleranciju i postovanje verskih objekata, – i da osnujemo, uz pomoc UNMIK-a i KFOR-a, zajednicke lokalne komitete koji bi razvili konkretne pilot-projekte koji imaju za cilj da podsticu postepeni povratak svih ljudi svojim domovima, pocevsi sa podrucjem Mitrovice i Gnjilana, koji se kasnije mogu prosiriti i na ostala podrucja.

Pristina, 2 jul 1999 (16:20)

Za predstavnike kosovskih Albanaca Za predstavnike kosovskih Srba

Hasim Taci s.r., Episkop Artemije s.r. Rexep Qosja s.r., Momcilo Trajkovic s.r. Kolj Berisa s.r., Protosindjel Sava s.r., Bljerim Salja s.r., Dusan Ristic s.r.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...