By The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Belgrade, 16 August 1999

Implementation of Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) and the Military Technical Agreement, the current situation and positions of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

The Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, recalling its communications to the Security Council and the United Nations Secretary-General, as well as to the Heads of UNMIK and KFOR and in particular, the positions expressed in its Memorandum of 27 July 1999 relating to the current situation in the Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohija (hereinafter: the Province), has the honour to draw attention to the following facts and views:

1. Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) has unequivocally reaffirmed the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and, accordingly, defined the mandates and the terms of reference of UNMIK and KFOR.

By accepting the Ahtisaari-Chernomyrdin paper and by its consistent implementation of UNSC resolution 1244 (1999) and the Military Technical Agreement (MTA), the FR of Yugoslavia has confirmed its commitment to a peaceful solution for the Province, on the basis of an autonomy guaranteeing full equality of citizens and national communities within the framework of the constitutional and legal systems of the Republic of Serbia and the FR of Yugoslavia.

2. Proceeding from the guarantees of the sovereignty and territorial unity of the FR of Yugoslavia, as well as security guarantees for all citizens in the Province, proceeding also from the inadmissibility of a security gap, from guarantees of the security and inviolability of international borders and an understanding regarding the return of a contingent of the Yugoslav Army and of police forces to the Province – the FR of Yugoslavia has expected that KFOR will in practice fulfil all its obligations, and particularly that it will guarantee the physical safety of citizens and their property, public order and peace.

3. The FR of Yugoslavia is deeply dissatisfied with, and seriously concerned over, many facts unambiguously showing that KFOR and UNMIK have not complied with their fundamental obligations as established by SCR 1244 (1999) and by the MTA. The following facts bear witness to it: In the two months of KFOR and UNMIK taking responsibility for the safety of citizens and their property, by a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing, more than 200,000 Serbs, Montenegrins and other non-Albanians have been expelled from the Province. In these two months, the terrorists have killed over 200 and wounded more than 400 civilians, women, children and elderly people, mostly Serbs and other non-Albanian residents. About 40,000 private homes and dwellings have been looted, demolished or burned, while 40 Serbian churches and medieval monasteries, many of which have been declared as part of European cultural heritage have been burned down or demolished. As many as 80,000 Serbs and other non-Albanian citizens have been intimidated and forced to leave their jobs. Responsibility for that lies with both KFORs and UNMIKs evidently tolerant attitude towards the terrorist so-called KLA and criminal gangs, being allowed to cross over illegally into the Province.

The obligation by the so-called KLA and other armed Albanian gangs and individuals to disarm has not been carried out, nor does the past attitude by KFOR regarding this vitally important obligation for the implementation of SCR 1244 (1999) give confidence that it will be strictly and effectively abided by.

Statements made by senior KFOR and UNMIK officials on alleged success in the demilitarization of the so-called KLA have been merely used as a cover for continuing the process of stock-piling and concealing huge quantities of weapons, from and via the territory of Albania and partly >from the territory of Macedonia as well. Ever since KFOR became responsible for the safety of citizens and their property, the Province has turned into a region of the largest build-up of uncontrolled, illegal weapons, terrorists, the drug mafia and criminal gangs in general, in contradiction with the main intent and basic goals of Security Council resolution 1244 (1999) and the MTA, thus posing a wider threat.

4. The assertions by KFOR, made in the monthly report back to the Security Council (S/1999/868, 10 August 1999), that the Serb exodus has slowed down as a result of KFOR efforts to ensure a safe environment, as well as the statements by KFOR and UNMIK officials to that effect, do not correspond to facts on the ground and divert attention from the heart of the matter. Indeed, the truth is that during the two months that KFOR and UNMIK have been deployed, nearly 200,000 Serbs and Montenegrins have been forcibly expelled from the Province in the face of KLA terrorism, so that only a small number of non-Albanians now remain in that part of Serbia. Of the 30,000 indigenous Serb and Montenegrin residents of Pristina before KFOR arrived, there are currently about 2,000, while the others were intimidated into departing. In the same period, more than 100,000 Albanians, citizens of Albania, amongst them a large number of criminals, plunderers, thugs, even members of the regular military forces of Albania, have entered and reside illegally in the Province with the permission of KFOR and UNMIK.

5. While UNMIK and KFOR, on the one hand, do not comply with their essential obligations under UNSC resolution 1244 (1999) and the MTA regarding personal safety and property security guarantees, in respect of demilitarization of the so-called KLA, while overall, they demonstrate an unacceptably tolerant attitude towards terrorists, bandits and proponents of violence, on the other hand, they seek to revise and enlarge in practice their mandate by ignoring the principle of sovereignty and territorial integrity, by disrespecting Yugoslav and Serbian laws and by delaying the implementation of those obligations meaning the protection of the rights and security of Serbs, Montenegrins, Roma, Muslims, the inhabitants of Gora, Turks and non-Albanians in general.

6. Bearing in mind the afore-mentioned, the Government of the FR of Yugoslavia declares that it does not recognize, nor will it recognize, any changes, decisions or measures that are contrary to the provisions and purposes of SCR 1244 (1999), the Ahtisaari-Chernomyrdin paper and the MTA from Kumanovo. The FR of Yugoslavia retains the continuity of its sovereign rights in the province as an integral part of its territory, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, the OSCE Final Act and the universal principles of contemporary international law. The guarantees of sovereignty and territorial integrity, as contained in resolution 1244 (1999), the Ahtisaari-Chernomyrdin paper and the MTA, the FRY considers final and unalterable.

7. For reasons stated above, the Government of the FR of Yugoslavia expects the Security Council to consider urgently the presented problems and to take appropriate steps to ensure full and consistent implementation of resolution 1244 (1999), in particular:

– to ensure full respect for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the FR of Yugoslavia, as unequivocally provided for under SCR 1244 (1999), operative paragraphs 10 and 11, Annex 1 and Annex 2, paragraph 8;

– to ensure respect for, and the application of, Yugoslav and Serbian laws and regulations. This implies the full respect of the unified legal, economic, financial (the dinar as the sole legal tender), tax, visa and passport systems; observance of the laws of the Republic of Serbia and the FR of Yugoslavia that are in force, in particular those relating to property, legal and status and administrative matters, registry of citizens, issue of personal identification documents, passports and other identity papers. Arbitrary decisions and selectivity in applying the legislation are not founded on resolution 1244 (1999) and constitute a violation of the principle of sovereignty and territorial integrity;

– to energetically put an end to violence against, and the ethnic cleansing of, Serbs, Montenegrins and other non-Albanians, to cease the tolerant attitude towards the terrorist so-called KLA and to establish the security of citizens and property and public order and peace in the Province; to conduct an effective investigation into the crimes committed, leading to the tracking down and arrest of all the perpetrators and those giving orders to them;

– to disarm immediately and effectively the terrorists of the so-called KLA, as required by operative subparagraph 9 (b) and paragraph 15 of resolution 1244 (1999); to trace the secret arms depots and cut off any further infiltration of illegal weapons;

– to ensure the full respect and inviolability of the State borders of the FR of Yugoslavia with Albania and Macedonia in their parts towards the Province; to prevent all illegal entries of non-residents of the FR of Yugoslavia;

– to deploy without delay contingents of the Yugoslav Army and police both at the border crossings and inside the Province, in accordance with operative subparagraph 9 (g) and operative paragraph 4 of resolution 1244 (1999), Annex 2, paragraph 6, and the MTA;

– to ensure full safety of Yugoslav customs and other officers, including their protection at work, an effective and unhampered operation of customs, visa and passport services, as well as immigration, anti-criminal, sanitary, phytopathological and veterinary control;

– to expel all non-residents of the FRY who, with the permission of KFOR, have illegally entered the Province as part of the sovereign territory of Serbia and the FRY, in violation of resolution 1244 (1999), the MTA and in breach of Yugoslav and international laws, rules and practices. In particular, we demand an immediate expulsion of the thugs and plunderers >from Albania, responsible for organized international crime, the drug mafia, arms smuggling, trade in people, the prostitution racket and other criminal gangs;

– to apply the unified visa regime and international agreements of the FR of Yugoslavia, implying the observance of the normal procedure under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations when foreign officials visit a part of the sovereign territory of the FR of Yugoslavia, the Province included; KFOR and UNMIK are not authorized to arrange or to allow the visits of foreign state representatives, with the exclusion of the Yugoslav authorities, since the Province is a part of the sovereign territory of the FR of Yugoslavia which is exclusively responsible for international contacts and visits. Any other behaviour represents a gross violation of the substance of SCR 1244 (1999), international law and practice and is not acceptable.

– To respect the democratic procedure and to cooperate in the process of the establishment of interim bodies of self-government with the competent authorities. UNMIK and KFOR are not authorized to impose arbitrarily, above and against the will of citizens belonging to individual ethnic communities members of interim bodies (councils). Only legitimate representatives of national communities may sit in those bodies.

– to prevent the establishment of offices, bureaus, etc. of other States in the Province without the prior consent of the competent FRY authorities;

– to provide full protection of the human rights and to ensure and guarantee conditions for the safe return of all refugee and displaced Serbs, Montenegrins, Roma, Muslims, the inhabitants of Gora and other victims of an organized campaign of ethnic cleansing conducted by the terrorist so-called KLA;

– to enable the re-opening and unimpeded operation of the Serbian-language State and private media;

– to provide the protection of Serbian cultural, historic and religious monuments in the Province from the daily vandalizing by the terrorists of the so-called KLA;

 – KFOR and UNMIK have no right to declare, let alone treat the indigenous Serbs and Montenegrins as a national minority in their own State, as was done in the monthly report to the Security Council on the KFOR operations (S/1999/868, 10 August 1999). This is incompatible with international standards, especially the Council of Europe Framework Convention on national minorities which are related to States as subjects of international law and not to provinces and autonomies as administrative units within sovereign States;

– to ensure the inviolability of private property and to give back without any further delay all property acquired by violence, and to restore in its entirety to its former state all movable and immovable property: flats, houses, companies and public institutions and all other conditions and relationships that result from violence and illegal conduct of individuals and groups;

– to respect and protect the ownership rights of the State of Serbia and the FRY over all movables and immovables; to respect and protect the status of public enterprises and systems, notably the EPC electricity company, PTT, Yugoslav Railways and others;

– to prevent, by resolute measures, all attempts at setting-up illegal, parallel institutions, services, illegal police, organs and bodies, etc;

– to ensure full freedom of movement and access, as well as security for humanitarian and other NGOs;

– to ensure an unhindered participation of Yugoslav experts and forensic specialists in the investigation of criminal acts, especially terrorist assaults, murders, abductions, and to cooperate with the Yugoslav authorities both in the elucidation of these crimes and the efforts to combat all forms of international organized crime;

– to halt urgently all steps and measures taken against the undertakings and without the participation of the competent Yugoslav authorities concerning the establishment of public and other services and the inadmissible favouring of Albanians over other ethnic communities.

8. Taking into account the fact that the Council is primarily responsible for the implementation of its resolution 1244 (1999), the Government of the FR of Yugoslavia urges the Council to take effective and resolute measures to implement its resolution 1244 (1999) and related documents fully and consistently, in the interest of normalizing the overall situation and creating conditions for the start of a political process of establishing the parameters of the autonomy.

The Yugoslav Government reiterates that the conclusion of a comprehensive agreement between the FR of Yugoslavia, as the host country, and the United Nations is a necessary prerequisite for cooperation between the Yugoslav authorities and the international civil and security presences (UNMIK, KFOR) mandated by the United Nations, as well as for a successful implementation of SCR 1244 (1999), and it calls on the Secretary-General to negotiate and sign such an agreement.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...