KLA Demilitarisation Deal Despite Last Minute Wrangles

By Laura Rozen in Pristina

Days of dispute slowed progress towards Monday night’s agreement on the demilitarisation of the Kosovo Liberation Army and highlighted a profound disagreement between the Kosovars and the international community on the nature of the force that will replace it.

The KLA made no secret of its intention to transform itself from a rebel army into a real army that will serve to defend a future independent Kosovo.

The internationals have tried to compromise by agreeing to the formation of a 5,000 person ‘Kosovo Protection Corps’, which they see as a civilian national guard type force that they intended to be as harmless as the Boy Scouts.

Sunday’s scheduled high-profile ceremony to mark the official end of the Kosovo Liberation Army failed to come to pass and another day of talks was needed to close the deal. The creation of the Corps was finally agreed on Monday night after hours of meetings between NATO supreme allied commander General Wesley Clark, and KLA military commander general Agim Ceku. The agreement calls for Ceku to become commander of the new corps – one of the KLA’s key demands.

Kosovo’s chief peacekeeper Lt-General Mike Jackson and UN senior official Bernard Kouchner envisage the Corps as a civilian organisation to help in civilian emergencies, reconstruction and search and rescue operations.

But concessions made in the final moments of the negotiations only underlined the increasingly obvious gap between how KLA commanders understand the future of the rebel army, and how Jackson’s KFOR peacekeepers see it.

Three stumbling blocks – the name of the Corps, its command structure, and the number of weapons some KLA commanders wanted to remain in possession of – were reported by sources close to the KLA to be the particular glitches which prevented Sunday’s signing ceremony from happening as scheduled.

The two sides agreed on the name of ‘Kosovo Protection Corps’, as requested by the KLA, instead of the ‘Kosovo Corps’ proposed by the internationals. Seen as a concession by KFOR, the word ‘protection’ in Albanian can also be translated as ‘defence’. KLA leaders have also consistently described this force to its rank-and-file and in the Albanian language press as a “Kosovo Army” or “Kosovo Troops”.

For not only the name of the force – which will have 3,000 full-time members and 2,000 reserves – but its essential nature, is at issue.

“The KLA is transforming, it won’t be called the KLA, but it will be a defence force of the citizens and territory of Kosovo,” 31 year old KLA political leader Hashim Thaci told cheering supporters in Pristina’s stadium following the KLA’s “farewell” parade through the town Saturday.

“Today, we are ending the march of freedom but we are starting the march of the future for the independent Kosovo and its army,” the KLA’s top military commander General Agim Ceku told the crowd. Ceku has been agreed as the new force’s commander.

The militaristic nature of the force KLA leaders describe is fundamentally at odds with the civilian nature of the national guard type force KFOR has agreed to train. As KFOR explains it, the Kosovo Protection Corps it has agreed to create would have absolutely “no military, law-enforcement or anti-terrorism functions.”

KFOR describes the duties of such a force as fundamentally civilian in nature; such as to provide rapid reaction services in the case of a natural disaster, or to assist with major infrastructure and good works projects around the province.

The new agreement will allow the Corps to deploy up to 200 small arms to its members guarding its bases. The KLA leaders wanted a larger number – 2,000 arms – to issue to the new corps. On this issue, KFOR did not give way; the number remains 200. However, KFOR officials earlier said that Kosovar citizens would be allowed to seek licenses to carry arms for “personal protection.” Presumably that means that some ex-KLA soldiers will be granted permission to possess certain types of small arms.

More than 10,000 weapons have already been handed over as part of as part of the UN mandated demilitarisation process.

KFOR spokesman acknowledge that Kosovo has a “culture of arms” and people are used to having weapons in their homes. Some might interpret his comments as saying, if the KLA would just sign the demilitarisation and keep weapons and uniforms out of sight and not cause trouble, then KFOR wasn’t going to go to great lengths to try to hunt for weapons buried in backyards and in basements throughout the province.

In fact, since it deployed three months ago, KFOR commanders have shown considerable sensitivity to the KLA leaders’ desire to play a constructive role in post-war Kosovo life. KLA members are being recruited in significant numbers into the new OSCE-trained Kosovo police force, and the fact that one has military experience is considered an asset when being considered for the force.

On Saturday, KFOR allowed the KLA soldiers to appear in uniform and lightly armed for the last time, as the force held a parade through the packed streets of the capital Pristina. KFOR’s willingness to create the Kosovo Corps is another indication of the international peacekeepers’ effort to give ex-Kosovar rebels a useful role in job-scarce Kosovo, and a sense of dignity.

And until snags marred the demilitarisation process Sunday, to date KFOR has generally praised the KLA for its compliance with the process, which has largely taken men in UCK uniforms off the streets. Although a brisk business in UCK car decals, key rings, and flags now thrives on the streets of Pristina.

KFOR’s fairly generous stance toward the KLA may have grown out of worries that too much pressure could lead to hardline factions of the organisation breaking away from the top leadership, and continuing its activities underground.

There was speculation that the KLA itself was in danger of splitting on these lines. KLA commander General Agim Ceku canceled a scheduled appearance with KFOR commander Lt. General Sir Mike Jackson Sunday morning to rush off to meet Ramush Harudinaj, a KLA zone commander in south-west Kosovo and former French foreign legionnaire. Harudinaj is one of two KLA regional commanders who were reported to be refusing to comply with turning over some weapons to KFOR.

KLA zone commanders were also reported to be anxious about losing the right to wear uniforms and their UCK insignia. Jackson said Tuesday that the new force’s emblem would use the same red, black and gold colours as the KLA insignia but replaces the Albanian double-headed eagle insignia with a map of Kosovo.

The demilitarisation process, which was extended to Tuesday midnight, required KLA soldiers to no longer appear in uniforms in Kosovo.

Laura Rozen has been covering the Balkans for western media since 1996.

The Institute of War & Peace Reporting <info@iwpr.net>

IWPR’s network of leading correspondents in the region provides inside analysis of the events and issues driving crises in the Balkans. The reports are available on the Web in English, Serbian and Albanian; English-language reports are also available via e-mail. For syndication information, contact Anthony Borden <tony@iwpr.net>.

Balkan Crisis Report is supported by the Department for International Development, European Commission, Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency, MacArthur Foundation, Press Now and the Carnegie Corporation. IWPR also acknowledges general support from the Ford Foundation.

*** ***

IWPR’s e-mail bulletin service is in the process of being upgraded. In the interim, please contact Duncan Furey for subscription assistance at <duncaniwpr.net>.

For further details on this project and other information services and media programmes, visit IWPR’s Website: <www.iwpr.net>.

Editor-in-chief: Anthony Borden. Assistant Editors: Christopher Bennett, Alan Davis. Senior Balkans Editor: Gordana Igric. Pristina Project Editor: Fron Nazi. Translation: Alban Mitrushi and others. Managing Editor: Rohan Jayasekera.

“Balkan Crisis Report” is produced under IWPR’s Balkan Crisis Information Project. The project seeks to contribute to regional and international understanding of the regional crisis and prospects for resolution.

The Institute for War & Peace Reporting (IWPR) is a London-based independent non-profit organisation supporting regional media and democratic change.

Lancaster House, 33 Islington High Street, London N1 9LH, United Kingdom. Tel: (44 171) 713 7130; Fax: (44 171) 713 7140 E-mail: info@iwpr.net; Web: www.iwpr.net

The opinions expressed in “Balkan Crisis Report” are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the publication or of IWPR.

Copyright (C) 1999 The Institute for War & Peace Reporting <www.iwpr.net>.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...