The People Power Revolution in the Philippines: Lessons Learned for the Twenty-first Century

In response to an urgent Appeal from all the living Nobel Peace Prize Laureates, the General Assembly of the United Nations, on November 1998, unanimously declared the first decade of the twenty-first century to be The Decade for a Culture of Peace and Nonviolence. While people are naturally concerned about the amount of violence in our world and how it threatens our future, the Nobel Laureates are right to remind us of the potential of nonviolence and our calling to build a culture of peace and nonviolence. 

The twentieth century is instructive in the way that the philosophy and practice of nonviolence have begun to flourish and in the way that nonviolent movements have had an exponential growth across the world. Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. are the most famous nonviolent leaders but many have built upon the paths they charted as in country after country, tyrannies and oppressors on every continent have fallen to the concerted efforts of nonviolent movements. One of the most significant of these movements is the 1986 People Power overthrow of the Marcos regime in the Philippines in which masses of unarmed Filipinos rose up to affirm the upset election of Corazon Aquino as president and, in an amazing 77-hour period, nonviolently force from office Ferdinand Marcos.

What are the lessons learned in that People Power movement, lessons that we need to study and apply to current problems in order to help us build the culture of peace and nonviolence to which the United nations has called us?

First, People Power forced us to ask, What is power? Many think of power strictly in a military way. Mao Tse Tung summed it up when he said, “Power grows out of the barrel of a gun”. It is not only Maoists who subscribe to this belief. We see it in those who say, “Prepare for peace by preparing for war”. We see it in the budgets of most nations, rich or poor, religious or secular, where enormous amounts are spent for the military. 

People Power taught us a different way of looking at power. Marcos and his powerful army were no match for the nonviolent people who rose up against the regime. If we define power as “the ability to achieve purpose” then we see that a large, well-equipped army may not enable a ruler to provide jobs and highways and schools for a nation. When India exploded a series of nuclear weapons in 1998 to prove itself a great “power”. S.K. Bandopadhaya of the Gandhi Memorial Trust wisely remarked, “While our leaders are talking about nuclear bombs as a deliverance, 350 million of our people remain below the poverty line, nearly fifty percent of our population is illiterate, and 100,000 of our villages don‚t even have safe drinking water. In the villages of Rajasthan, where they detonated those bombs, many women still walk ten to twelve miles a day just to fetch water. This is the real India, the India that Indians already live in. And when all the fuss and shouting dies down, they will realize that nuclear bombs do nothing, absolutely nothing to help them”.

Secondly, People Power showed us the power of Truth. Gandhi defined nonviolence as satyagraha, truth power. God is Truth and that Truth is planted in every human heart. As the Quakers say, “There is that of God in everyone”. Within every person is the hunger for Truth and if that Truth is denied by lies and falsehood, people begin to feel violated. It is natural that all people want to be treated fairly and honestly. When they respond to the claim of Truth and join with others, they begin to express real power, a power that can reach a critical mass that becomes irresistible. Such is what happened in the Philippines in 1986.

This leads us to our third lesson learned: people have power. No matter how humble or poor or lacking in social status, when people rise up against evil, they are powerful. Poll watchers in the Marcos-Aquino contest stood their ground against armed goons. Thirty computer operators risked their lives to tell the world that Marcos was trying to falsify the election results. The world marvelled at Epifanio de los Santos Avenue (EDSA) when tanks and armored personnel carriers were stopped by the prayers and good will of the people.

A related lesson is that everyone can play a part in people power. Military power depends on highly trained, well armed soldiers, especially young strong men. As the Gandhian and Kingian movements showed, people power can draw upon everyone–old and young, rich and poor, abled and disabled.  Old people and children did their part at EDSA as part of the “unarmed forces of the Philippines”. Youth standing their ground in front of armed soldiers unnerved them as they gave their fierce foe sandwiches and candies.

Fifth, government rests upon the consent or the acquiescene of the governed. The way that corrupt or tyrannical or incompetent governments rule is through the passive acceptance of the ruled. But if the ruled begin to resist, even tyrants are weakened and can eventually be brought down. Andrei Sakharov, though internally exiled to Gorky, was a force the Soviet Union did not know how to control: one unarmed person speaking out for human rights in the Russian interior could not be stopped. The brutal government of Burma today does not know what to do with Aung San Suu Kyi, a slight, unarmed woman whose voice expresses the longing of the Burmese people for freedom.  Benigno Aquino was kept in prison for seven years and still he was a threat to Marcos. Even when he was killed at Manila International Airport, his spirit lived on with power to challenge the seemingly all “powerful” Marcos. When people withdraw their consent to be governed, the government experiences a loss of power. As the resistance grows, the government finds itself increasingly weakened.

Sixth, an indomitable will can bring down an oppressor. The Brazilians call nonviolence firmeze permanente, relentless persistence. The old chant, “The people united can never be defeated” holds great truth. When I was teaching nonviolence to representatives of the South Africa Council of Churches in l988, the government had just declared emergency rule and the anti-apartheid movement was very discouraged. Things had never been worse.  Repression was enormous. But one old woman stood up and said, “In Soweto we have a saying, ŒThe dying horse kicks hardest just before it dies.‚ The South African government is coming down harder than ever because our movement is wearing it down. They know if they don‚t stop us, they will collapse”. She was very wise. It was not long before President deKlerk released Nelson Mandela, called for national elections and the apartheid regime was thrown out by the people they had oppressed for so long. In like manner, the Filipino people‚s resistance to dictatorship finally won the day.

Seventh, training is important in preparing a people for nonviolent resistance. In 1984 and 1985 many workshops in nonviolence were held with student, labor and religious activists opposing dictatorship. When the elections were called poll watchers were trained all over the country. During the EDSA resistance, Radio Veritas continually prepared people for the struggle, with such things as readings of Jesus, Gandhi, King and others, along with practical instructions (bring food and water, no weapons, damp clothes and calamunsi in case of tear gas, etc.).  We should not rely on spontaneity to bring about a culture of peace and nonviolence. It must be prepared for in our churches and schools and community organizations. Step by step, vision, strategy and tactics need to be developed for hopeful, peace change. Eighth, the People Power movement was only a first step; it is not magic nor does it by-pass the need of careful, wise next steps. Systemic change is an ongoing, organic process that has to deal with all the pillars of oppression in a society. Bringing down an oppressor must be followed by replacing the oppressive structures with structures that are just. This is the role of a real democracy, which is the institutionalization of nonviolent problem-solving in the social order. Education, conflict resolution, the struggle for justice, nonviolent direct action, organizing for special needs, voting on issues, adjudicating differences, framing laws for change and reform: all of these need to be perfected as we seek to build a culture of peace and nonviolence.

Ninth, we need to re-learn history. Too much of what we have learned centers on battles and wars and minimizes the multitude of nonviolent episodes and movements in history. People often scoff at nonviolence as impractical, even impossible, forgetting Gandhi who said “Undreamt of and seemingly impossible discoveries will be made in the field of nonviolence”.  And this has been happening! In the 1980s alone, dictatorial regimes were brought down peacefully across Latin America, the Soviet bloc and parts of Asia and Africa. These have scarcely been studied; the lessons to be learned are massive and need to be appropriated for the struggles of the coming century. And long before the recent past there is a vast, largely unknown or forgotten history of powerful nonviolent efforts (e.g., such as the way Norwegian teachers and judges successfully resisted Nazi efforts to make Norway a corporate state fashioned after Nazi edicts; and the 6,000 women in Berlin during World War II who demonstrated for the release of 1,500 Jewish men and who would not stop until the men were released).

Finally, People Power demonstrates the potential power of religious faith in the building of a just society. Filipinos, driven by faith and determination, discovered courage, forgiveness, compassion and hope, as they risked their lives to save their country. Attending workshops, campaigning for a dictator’s opponent, guarding polling places–all required a courageous willingness to take a stand for freedom. Going to “Tent Cities” to pray and fast and be trained grew out of a determined faith. Ordinary people did extraordinary things as they sang and prayed in facing down armed soldiers. Enlisted men and officers risked arrest and even execution when they disobeyed orders to open fire on the protesters. People of various faiths came together at EDSA in a great ecumenical–nay, interfaith–movement for justice in the tradition of Gandhi and King. Both Gandhi and King were grounded in Jesus‚ teaching to love the enemy and overcome evil with good as they developed the philosophy and practice of nonviolence. King took the methodology of Gandhi and the spirit of Christ to fashion a dynamic, morally grounded, approach to social change that proved to be revolutionary. People Power was another step in humanity’s quest to build a just and free society.

A global civilization is struggling to be born.Technology increasingly brings the world closer together and our interrelationships grow in complexity. We have become more and more interdependent upon people ev erywhere. As Dr. King put it, “We are tied together in a single garment of destiny”. 

All people of goodwill, who honor truth, goodness and beauty, are called to work together to fashion a world culture of peace and nonviolence. We have precedents such as the People Power movement in the Philippines to inspire and instruct us.   

Related Posts

Photos © TFF 2000 Read PressInfo 90 “Lift the Sanctions and Bring More Aid to Yugoslavia” See Pictures from Belgrade © TFF 2000 Please reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.
By Jan ObergTFF co-founder and director February 11, 2026 PART 3 — ECONOMICS, TRADE & FINANCIAL SOVEREIGNTY A. Trade Measures & Market Signaling Economic pressure can be applied instantly and scaled without violence. Immediate Measures (within a week) Government boycott US goods and services  A very powerful signal which over time will be felt. Targeted tariffs on selected U.S. goods Symbolic but high-visibility sectors send a clear message. Suspend trade facilitation talks A peaceful pause that signals deep concern. Freeze U.S. participation in public procurement – military procurement in particular A nonviolent way to reduce influence. Competition law review of U.S. corporations A legal tool to scrutinise market dominance. Longer-Term Measures EU–Asia–Africa trade corridors Reducing reliance on U.S. markets. European supply chains for critical minerals Strategic autonomy in resource access. European Strategic Trade Authority Monitoring coercive practices globally. Euro-denominated commodity markets Weakening the dollar’s pricing monopoly. The EU must resume contacts and negotiations with Russia, focusing on energy cooperation To...
PART 2 — Diplomacy, Law and Nonviolent Power By Jan ObergTFF co-founder and director January 26, 2026 This is the second of four TFF-created idea portfolios designed to curb the global reach of the United States and, in both the short and long term, help catalyse a worldwide nonviolent resistance to what many observers describe as the Trump administration’s uniquely confrontational, destructive and world-threatening policies. These portfolios outline what governments and citizens across the world can do through dynamic diplomacy, creative initiatives, and strictly nonviolent means. They are typical TFF works in that we do not only tell what the problem is and how bad it will go – as 90+% of all commentators, experts and scholars do – we tell what we think can be done, inviting you to think of what you think you can do. It seems painfully clear to me that the current political dynamics in Washington increasingly resemble the most dangerous...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...