Arundhati Roys politiska essäer är genomgående ytterst läsvärda, originella, skrivna med kunskap, engagemang och vrede över sakernas tillstånd, menar Sören Sommelius.

Boken
DEN OÄNDLIGA RÄTTVISANS MATEMATIK
Av: Arundhati Roy
Förord: John Berger
I översättning av Hans O. Sjöström, Lars Andersson och Tor Wennerberg
Ordfront
Utkommer i dag (21/10 2003)

Med “De små tingens Gud” fick den indiska författarinnan Arundhati Roy sitt stora internationella genombrott. Hon fick 1998 det prestigefyllda Bookerpriset och romanen översattes till en lång rad språk. Men ungefär samtidigt tog det högerinriktade och hinduchauvinistiska partiet BJP makten i hennes hemland. Den nya regimen genomförde en serie kärnvapenprov som provocerade grannlandet Pakistan och förde de både länderna i krig med varandra. Båda parter hotade varandra med kärnvapen mer eller mindre öppet.

Vem skriver skönlitteratur i sådana tider? Inte Arundhati Roy. I sin mycket uppmärksammade essä “Fantasiförmågans slut” gick hon till fränt angrepp mot de politiker som genom kärnvapenproven ville framställa Indien som en potent stormakt. Därtill framställdes Bomben som det nya Indien, men inte hela Indien utan det hinduiska Indien.

Kärnvapnen tränger in i människors tänkande, skrev Arundhati Roy. Hon stämplades direkt av många som landsförrädare.

“Om detta att protestera mot att ha en nukleär bomb inplanterad i min hjärna är antihinduiskt och antinationellt, då utträder jag. Jag förklarar mig härmed vara en oberoende, mobil republik. Jag är medborgare på Jorden. Jag besitter inget territorium. Jag har ingen flagga.”

“Fantasiförmågans slut” inleder Arundhati Roys samling med dussinet politiska essäer, som i dag publiceras på svenska. Utgångspunkten för de flesta av samlingens texter är tillståndet i världen efter elfte september. De är med undantag för den första essän skrivna under den världshistoriskt så omvälvande perioden oktober 2001 till maj 2003. Två av dem har tidigare publicerats på Aftonbladets kultursidor, som spelar en helt avgörande roll för den politiska debatten i Sverige i frågor som dessa. Men de övriga presenteras för första gången på svenska. Titeln, “Den oändliga rättvisans matematik” anspelar på det namn USA först gav bombningarna av Afghanistan, “Operation oändlig rättvisa”.

Bokens texter är skrivna vid olika tidpunkter i skenet av då aktuella politiska händelser. En del av det Roy skriver har vidareutvecklats av andra i andra sammanhang senare. Ändå är essäerna genomgående ytterst läsvärda, originella, skrivna med kunskap, engagemang och vrede över sakernas tillstånd. Här finns ett självklart tredjevärldenperspektiv, där Roy relaterar till egna djupt upplevda erfarenheter.

Arundhati Roy föddes i den sydindiska delstaten Kerala 1959, samma år som en demokratiskt vald kommunistisk regim tog makten i provinsen. Som ung flicka upplevde hon Vietnamkriget , där USA bekämpade en kommunistisk regering i ett risodlande land. Hon greps av fasa:

“Vi hade djungler, floder, risfält och dessutom kommunister. Hela tiden föreställde jag mig hur min mor, min bror och jag själv slungades ut ur buskagen av en granat eller mejades ner, på samma sätt som gulingarna i filmerna, av en amerikansk marinsoldat med muskulösa armar, tuggummi och hög musik i bakgrunden. I mina drömmar var jag den brinnande flickan på det berömda fotografi som togs på vägen från Trang Bang.”

Återkommande fokuserar Arundhati Roy på USA:s roll och på den nuvarande högerextrema amerikanska regeringens destruktiva politik. Hur har USA kunnat överleva sitt fruktansvärda förflutna (slaveriet, min anm) och kommit att framträda med en sådan väldoft?, undrar hon och påminner om Hiroshima och annat. Hon skriver i Noam Chomskys anda i sin kritik av det amerikanska samhället, där rätten att tala fritt blivit en vara som allt annat, för den som har råd att betala. Hon efterlyser en kritik av de kommersiella medier som mest är anslagstavlor för storföretag och efterlyser ett universum av alternativ information.

En stor del av boken handlar om Irakkriget, inklusive dess förspel och det smutsiga efterspel vi alla nu dag för dag bevittnar. Hon ger konkreta förslag till hur vi kan förhålla oss. Under apartheidtiden bojkottade många de företag som gjorde affärer med Sydafrika. På samma sätt skulle i dag folkliga sanktioner kunna införas mot alla de storföretag som kammat hem ytterligt lönsamma kontrakt i Irak, som Bechtel, Chevron och Haliburton.

Genom att inte bara beskriva övergrepp och orättvisor utan också föreslå civil olydnad och icke-våldsmetoder knyter Arundhati Roy an till Mahatma Gandhi. Kanske är hon en Gandhi för vår tid?

John Berger står för ett inkännande och entusiastiskt förord, där han bland annat skriver:

“Detta är en bekännelse av en underbar skribent, men också en bekännelse som miljoner människor omedelbart känner igen som en del av sin egen verklighet”.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...