Boken
VÄRLDENS CENTRUM
En essä om globalisering
Av: Stefan Jonsson
Norstedts

“Världens 358 rikaste människor tjänar tillsammans lika mycket som världens 2.5 miljarder fattigaste.”

Författaren och journalisten Stefan Jonsson bevakade 1995 FN:s stora sociala konferens i Köpenhamn. I sin nya bok “Världens centrum”, med undertiteln “En essä om globalisering” låter han en indisk utvecklingsteoretiker lägga fram uppgifter om tillståndet i världen. Medan konferensen pågick rapporterade han från den som journalist. I ett av avsnitten i sin bok reflekterar han över tillståndet i världen utifrån konferensens kartläggning av det globala tillståndet.

Hur ska man kunna förstå en så ojämlik värld, där samma ekonomiska mekanismer skapar både gigantiska rikedomar åt få och massfattigdom åt andra?

Kanske kan man överblicka situationen genom att uppsöka “världens centrum”, för att där finna en punkt varifrån världen kan överblickas.

Men hur finner man “världens centrum”? Jonsson funderar.

Följ ledarnas limousiner, säger någon.

Följ pengarna och penningflödet, rekommenderar en annan. Och Ralph Nader, den amerikanske miljöaktivisten, föreslår “följd avloppsledningarna”. Nader påminner med ett exempel om hur amerikanska bolag i Mexiko dumpar lösningsmedel vars giftiga ämnen hundratals gånger överskrider det egna landets gränsvärden.

En annan indier ger på samma konferens ett pedagogiskt exempel genom att jämföra vad en börsmäklare i New York kan tjäna jämfört med en kvinna på Sri Lanka. En kvarts arbete på Wall Street kan då ge samma inkomst som den lankesiska kvinnan för att tjäna ihop måste arbeta 4 351 år.

Vårt förhållande till den samhälleliga helheten liknar torparens förhållande till jetplanen, skriver Stefan Jonsson. Vi ser &endash; men förstår lite eller inget och få bryr sig.

“Världens centrum” är tredje delen av en trilogi, där författaren förhåller sig till nyckelfrågor i samtiden. I “De andra” (1993) handlade det om rasism och nationalism. “Andra platser” (1995) diskuterade kulturell identitet, , hus, minnen, identitet, sambanden mellan “vilka vi är och orterna där vi bor” med bland annat en lysande essä om nobelprisaktuelle V S Naipaul.

I “Världens centrum” tar sig Stefan Jonsson an frågor som rör globaliseringen, med nyckelbegrepp som kartor, gränser, centrum/periferi.

Det här är sådant som bestämmer mänsklighetens grundläggande villkor. I den globaliserade världen flödar information och varor i avancerade nätverk. Men trots det synliggörs de frågor Jonsson diskuterar nästan aldrig massmedialt. Klyftorna mellan vi och dom, mellan den rika världen och de fattiga länderna, är sällan nyhetsmässig.

Dock utgör den dramatiska hösten 2001 kanske ett undantag, med attentatet mot World Trade Center, som en attack mot “värdens centrum” och de amerikanska bombningarna av Afghanistan som centrums vedergällning och maktdemonstration mot periferin.

Därmed menar jag framförallt att Stefan Jonssons bok publiceras vid alldeles rätt tidpunkt, som ett engagerat och nödvändigt inlägg i för samtiden och framtiden alldeles avgörande frågor, en bok som förmedlar synnerligen inspirerande läsning, i den för mänskligheten så dystra tid vi lever i, tolv år efter det kalla krigets slut.

Stefan Jonsson undersöker tillståndet i världen. Han arbetar med essän som form och verktyg, ger röst åt insiktsfulla kritiker och reflekterar själv. Hans bok består av åtta kapitel som alla på något vis tar sin utgångspunkt i kartor, där kartritandet står för försök att kartlägga sammanhang, att se och förstå.

Författaren reser och uppsöker. I Senegals huvudstad Dakar träffar han den radikale egyptiske ekonomen Samir Amin, som påminner om att produktiviteten i Europa vid den industriella revolutionens barndom var 1.3 gånger större än annorstädes. I dag är produktiviteten i centrum 60 gånger högre än i periferin. Amin påtalar kapitalismens tre stora nackdelar, att “marknaden genomtränger privatlivet och förvandlar alla sociala förhållanden till varor”, att rika och fattiga länder polariseras och att produktivkrafterna miljömässigt “riskerar att förinta planetens livsbetingelser”.

Författaren beger sig också till Grönland, till Ittoqqortoormiit, där han lyssnar till historier om danska koloniala övergrepp gentemot lokalbefolkningen. “Få orter har så dåliga odds … och så mycket att lära världen”, säger en dansk som tagit grönländarnas parti i denna “Edens lustgård, modell Arktis”.

Stefan Jonsson diskuterar den nya världsordningen efter 1989 och använder motvilligt den svårdefinierade modetermen “globalisering”. Med den markerar han ett problemfält, en ambition att söka kartlägga det världsomspännande nät genom vilket information, värden och makt strömmar.

Allra sist kommer han faktiskt fram till världens centrum, till Felicity, en stad i Kalifornien som lanserat sig som “världens mitt” med en tio meter hög marmorpyramid rest över den exakta mitten, på amerikanskt vis. Kommunstyrelsen i denna staden “Glädjen” har fastställt att Felicity är väldens officiella centrum. Kanske kan man på så vis locka turister till den kaliforniska öknen.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...