I Gandhis fotspår 7 – Saltmarschen – Gandhis och min egen

Så här började det…

Gandhi skickade den 2 mars 1930 ett brev till den engelske vicekungen i Indien, Lord Irwin, och förvarnade honom om att en aktion för civil olydnad skulle ta sin början den 12 juli. Han intygar att han inte kan skada någon engelsman men att hela det brittiska kolonialväldet är exploaterande, har förstört indisk kultur och gjort folket till slavar och att man uppenbarligen inte ämnar genomföra några ändringar som kunde påverka kommersiella intressen. Skattesystemet syftar till att slå ut bönderna.

“Även saltet som bönderna behöver för livets uppehälle har skattebelagts så att de ska betala mest”, skrev Gandhi. “Men själv har Ni en lön kring 7000 dollar per månad. Det är 235 dollar per dag mot den indiska genomsnittsinkomsten på 4 cent! Så mycket kan ni knappast ens använda, så jag är övertygad om att Ni ger det till välgörenhet. Men ett sådant system förtjänar att hamna på soptippen. Bara organiserad ickevåld kan stoppa den brittiska regeringens organiserade våld.”

Gandhi fortsätter med att förklara att deltagarna i denna aktion för civil olydnad kommer att “bortse” ifrån saltskatten och är redo att gå i fängelse om inte brevet appellerar till Irwins hjärta. Skulle Irwin vara beredd att diskutera kommer aktionen att avblåsas. Brevet är, intygar Gandhi, inte ett hot utan ett uttryck för öppen kommunikation, en satyagrahis (sanningskämpes) första plikt.

Irwin själv svarade inte. Han arresterade inte heller Gandhi. Då.

Saltmarschen börjar 12 mars 1930 kl 06:30

Knappt 80 Gandhi-anhängare lämnade Sabarmati den 12 mars 06.30. Tanken var att vandra söderut längs västkusten, samla stöd i byarna, hålla tal och mobilisera pressen hemma och i England. Ingen, inte heller Gandhi, visste den morgonen hur eller var det skulle sluta, nämligen på en gudsförgäten strand i en liten ort, Dandi, den 5 april, 385 kilometer söderut.

Monumentet i Dandi där Gandhi plockade upp en näve salt – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

Men saltet var alltså det symboliska medlet, Indiens självständighet målet – som inte uppnåddes för än 17 år senare!

För snart 20 år sedan upprepade Tom Weber, australiensisk Gandhi-expert och TFF-rådgivare, hela marschen på egen hand. Hans tegelstenstora bok där han genom “deltagande observation” utforskar Saltmarschen kom ut 1997, On the Salt March. The Historiography of Gandhi’s March to Dandi, (Harper Collins, Delhi, 594 sidor).

Med en blandning av skönlitteratur och litterär road movie gör Weber en minutiös efterforskning av alla källor och samtalar med alla som då var med på Marschen. Han har skapat en ovärderlig kronologi och analys av denna politiska aktion för självständighet, kanske historiens egendomligaste. Det är absurd teater, existentialism, symbolpolitik och realpolitik i ett, det är fars och tragedi, det är Dramat vid Havet genom vilket engelsmännen äntligen förstod att det var början till slutet.

Den som sett Gandhi-filmen kommer ihåg de mycket brutala scenerna vid Saltverken i Dharasana. 2500 satyagrahi hade kommit upp ifrån Bombay. Rad efter rad av vitklädda, obeväpnade marschdeltagare klubbades ned och låg blödande. Redan första dagen dödades 2 och 320 sårades. Många arresterades, fängelserna fylldes snabbt och Gandhi fördes till Punas fängelse.

Detta inträffade några dagar efter det att han nära havet i Dandi hade plockat upp en lerig klump med lite sand i och därmed trotsat det brittiska herraväldet. Som Louis Fischer skriver i sin klassiske biografi, The Life of Mahatma Gandhi (Harper & Row 1950): “Indien var nu fritt. Tekniskt, legalt hade dock inget förändrats. Tagore förklarade skillnaden: De som bor i England inser nu att Europa fullständigt har förlorat sin moraliska prestige.”

Min egen marsch  

Den 12 mars i år kl 06.30 marscherade jag själv ut genom Sabarmati-ashramens grind, i samma höga tempo, de första 6-7 kilometrarna ned till Ellis Bridge. En nästan full måne stod i väst medan solen gick upp över floden. Människor tittade ut under sina filter på denna märkliga man (som var jag) med kamera, papper och penna: good morning! Jag försökte föreställa mig hur marschdeltagarna tänkte just då. De hade lämnat hustrur och barn bakom sig i ashramen, helt medvetna om att de skulle kunna komma att dö för Indiens sak.

Morgon på Ashram Road 1 – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

Idag är Ashram Road en trespårig väg med butiker, biografer etc. För 71 år sedan var den en grusväg mellan stadskärnan och den by som omgav ashramen.Luften är rimligt klar, det infernaliska trafikbullret har inte börjat än. En kamel pinkar just som jag passerar den.

Jag når fram till Gandhi-bron 07.15 där det står en jättestaty av Gandhi, nu badad på ena sidan i solens röda ljus. Han står mitt i trafiken, omgiven av reklam, också för cigaretter och sprit. Stackars Mahatma!

Gandhi på Ashram Road – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

Vidare förbi Nehru Bridge och 07.50 över Ellis Bridge in mot centrum. Jag tittar ned i den nästan uttorkade floddalen där flera män sitter på huk och skiter.

Jag promenerar till Ahmedabads lyxiga Holiday Inn och äter frukost med gudomligt god ananas lassi (yoghurt). Där kan jag samtidig skriva över mina noter ifrån papper till min palm-dator. Det är fascinerande att kunna gå in och ur olika världar på noll tid. Frågan är om vi överhuvudtaget lever i den samma?

Morgon i Sabarmati-floden – Photo Jan Öberg, © TFF 2001

Så långt första etappen av min privata Saltmarsch. I en följande artikel kommer jag ut till havet. I bil. Med en som var med då, 1930.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...