Romanian and U.S. militarism increases insecurity in South Eastern Europa and the Black Sea Region

”Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”

President Dwight Eisenhower

The agreement recently signed between the government of Romania and the government of the United States represents one of the greatest political failures in Romania in recent decades. It is part of a continuing policy rooted in the absence of responsible politics and a reliance on increasing militarism and aggressive military engagement in a broader US dependent alliance.

Romania is the first post-Warsaw pact country to establish permanent US military bases in its territory, contributing to increased insecurity and militarization of the Black Sea region. This step is part of the policies of Romanian governments over the past 14 years – regardless of political party – which have led to the promotion of increased militarization, participation in three foreign wars and accompanying occupation, and misuse of national resources for excessive and unnecessary military expenditures.

US military deployment in Romania will include use of the Mihail Kogalniceanu airbase in southern Romania as the centre for its Eastern European Task Force (EATF). US forces will also use the Smardan training range, Babadag training area and Cincu training range. This is not the first time Romania has cooperated with the US military. In 2003 American soldiers used the Mihail Kogalniceanu air base to transfer US soldiers and military property into Iraq during the early stage of the Iraq war. Romania is also one of the few countries in the world which has increased its military presence in the occupation and war in Iraq, rather than calling for their withdrawal. Romania has 860 troops in the US occupation of Iraq, and additional troops in Afghanistan. Romania is also widely believed within Europe, internationally, and by Human Rights Watch, to be hosting a secret prison at the Mihail Kogalniceanu airbase as part of the United States global prison terror network, involving wide-spread illegal abduction and use of torture.

Given Romania’s own historical experiences of brutal and violent repression and use of torture against citizens by an authoritarian regime, Romania’s believed participation in this US run torture network, if true, is one of the greatest betrayals by the regime to the cause of human rights, democracy and freedom in Romania and internationally.

Active and engaged discussion of these issues, by all levels of Romanian society, media, academics and politicians is essential, whatever one’s position. Dialogue and investigation of alternatives and appropriate policies are vital. The participation of Romania as a host of foreign military bases and participant in wars which escalate and increase violence and threat of terrorism world-wide represents an extreme negative choice in the range of options facing the country. The measly economic benefit which will be brought in by US bases – a core focus of nearly all media reporting on the issue – will not equal the economic loss to Romania through misappropriation of revenue for increased military expenditures and the Bechtel highway in the country, nor the damage done by Romania for prospects for greater democratization and economic, social and political cooperation in Europe, South Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region. Romania today is becoming a country rapidly losing the respect of its own citizens and the world for the foreign policy roles it is playing.

In 1968 when the Soviet military illegally invaded Czechoslovakia, Romania had the courage and integrity to refuse to take part, and provided a refuge and asylum to Czechoslovak dissidents. This represented a high-point in Romania’s refusal to be involved in illegal acts of aggression and war, even when under significant pressure, building upon its past positive experience in the inter-war period in promoting disarmament and non-aggression. In 2002 Romania was one of the first countries to ask to be allowed to participate in the illegal war and occupation in Iraq which has so far contributed to the deaths of more than 100,000 Iraqi citizens, and continued instability and violence in the country, including wide-spread use of torture and human rights violations by the occupying countries.

In 1958 Soviet military forces and bases were withdrawn from Romania representing a step, if only a small one, to increased independence and sovereignty for the country. In 2005, Romania has invited another foreign power to establish military bases on Romanian soil, contributing to the expansion of military bases world-wide and a failure to develop responsible, effective and practical policies to deal with the challenges and issues facing Romania and the world today. Experience from the United States global network of bases has also shown a long track record of increases in prostitution, sexual violence, and rape, bringing negative social consequences, environmental pollution and human rights violations.

Concrete Proposals and Therapy

These policies and their importance to the country mean that they belong in the democratic space of decision making where all citizens have a right and responsibility to take part. Media, academics, NGOs, writers, politicians and all citizens in the country have a vital role to play in engendering a vibrant, constructive discussion of the challenges and issues facing Romania, domestically and internationally, and developing effective policies and responses which address the needs of Romania and its citizens and contribute to the promotion of democracy, human rights, and the effective and peaceful transformation of conflicts in the region and internationally.

The following are a number of proposals which represent a practical and principled alternative for Romanian foreign policy:

• Non-stationing of foreign military bases in Romania: a policy which would prevent any country from maintaining foreign military bases in Romania, including withdrawal from all treaties which allow for the positioning of foreign military bases and the use of Romanian territory and airspace for military action against other countries

• Non-participation in illegal wars and acts of aggression against foreign countries: including respect for international law and the UN charter and withdrawal of all Romanian military units and personnel participating in the US wars of occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan

• Active participation in international fora, the UN and European Union to develop effective responses and practical solutions to the challenges of war and terrorism in the world today: Romania has so far played a minimal if not totally absent role in meaningful efforts by countries internationally to develop effective responses to addressing the root causes of terrorism (state and non-state), and developing effective mechanisms and tools for the resolution of domestic and international conflicts and prevention of war. This should change, with Romania, building upon its own historical experience, playing an active role in building international cooperation and alliances (with governments and citizens) to promote dialogue, respect for human rights, and regional and international efforts to transform conflicts constructively and effectively through peaceful means.

• Promotion of a ‘Demilitarized Zone/Peace Zone’ in the Black Sea Region: As an example of this, Romania could pioneer a policy of constructive engagement with all countries in the Black Sea Region for the total demilitarization of this international space and the promotion of greater regional social, political and economic development and integration and creation of a Zone of Peace in the Black Sea Region.

Would you be reading this now,
if it wasn’t useful to you?
Get more quality articles in the future

• Support for the creation of a UN Commission on Peacebuilding and EU Peace Commissioner and Peacebuilding Office: Going a step further, Romania could play an active role in supporting the development of effective infrastructure and mechanisms for the peaceful resolution and transformation of conflicts within Europe and internationally

• Establish a Romanian Ministry for Peace, Civil Peace Service and national peacebuilding infrastructure: Addressing this on a domestic level and following the model now being developed throughout Europe and internationally to professionally train foreign service and civil personnel for crisis response and prevention, conflict transformation, emergency relief and humanitarian aid, and post-war and post-violence recovery and reconstruction

• Support democratization, human rights mobilization and peace work in Iraq, Afghanistan, the United States and Britain: Providing direct government-to-government, citizen-to-citizen, civil society and sectoral cooperation – including teachers, engineers, and human rights workers – to organisations, communities and citizens in these countries working to promote democratization, respect for human rights, and the transformation of conflicts within their countries and in their countries’ engagement internationally.

• Support and encourage responsible media reporting: The media has a vital role to play in ensuring that citizens have access to correct and diverse information. Citizens, academics, politicians, and NGOs should support and encourage media and journalists in Romania to critically question and investigate and provide professional and responsible reporting and coverage of diverse opinions on such important issues.

• Promote democratic discussion and involvement on these issues in Romania: Including creating citizens fora and spaces for discussing these issues, public meetings, and vibrant dialogue and sharing of opinions and perspectives, as well as direct action to promote awareness and understanding of the issues facing the country and responsible policy options and alternatives.

These are policies which, if properly discussed and brought forward, could be supported by the overwhelming majority of citizens in Romania, and earn Romania the respect of the international community.

Continuing on Romania’s current path can only lead to increased disillusionment and loss of respect for Romania as a member of the community of nations, and Romania’s continuing contribution to war crimes and crimes against humanity through participation in wars and (possible) torture networks.

Alternatives are possible. It is up to citizens, media, academics, writers, politicians and all sectors of society in Romania to discuss these issues, to explore the impacts and effects of different policies and actions, and to choose through democratic processes the policies which meet the needs of the country, and contribute to the promotion of peace, human rights, and the abolition of war and terrorism world-wide.

The challenge is there! May we have the courage to take it up.

Links and Resources

Peace Action, Training and Research Institute of Romania (PATRIR)

Foreign Policy in Focus

TRANSCEND

US Department of Peace

Ministry for peace UK

Department of Peace Canada

TFF – Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research

Conflict Prevention Partnership

Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict (GPPAC)

Z Magazine

European Peacebuilding Liaison Office

Nonviolent Peaceforce

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...