Irak 1
Helsingborgs Dagblad

Embedsmanden i det lille kontor i Irak rejser sig op og trykker min hånd og siger “fred være med Dem” og “velkommen til Irak” med den anden hånd mot sit hjerte.Han har en Samsung-computer på skrivebordet, og mens jeg venter, kan jeg se en ung, letklædt kvinde danse på skærmen ackompagneret af et lille orkester: “CD fra Syrien. Ikke dårligt, hva’?” Et fjernsyn ved den enkle jernseng, hvor han formodentlig hviler sig, når der ikke er nogen rejsende der vil ind i landet, står og murrer uden billede. Dette er det første eksempel på noget jeg senere skulle erfare mange gange: Der kommer faktisk varer in i Irak.

Jeg rejser fra Amman i Jordan. Der er ca. 900 km. til Bagdad. Det tog godt og vel en time ved grænsen for at komme ind i Irak. Jeg deklarerede min valuta og et dokument over min komputer og mit kamara blev oprettet. I løbet af ventetiden blev jeg budt på sød te; alle var venlige og høflige. Taskerne skulle åbnes, men hverken bøger eller papirer blev gransket.

Det sandgrå, flade og stenrige landskab strækker sig så langt øjet når mod den varmedirrende horisont. Skulle man lede efter nogle kg. kemisk substans, eller dele til masseødelæggelsesvåben, så kunne det let ligge begravet her omkring, uden at man nogensinde ville finde det. At, i dette vældige land, våbeninspektører nogensinde skulle kunne garantere at sådanne substanser ikke findes, så FNs sikkerhedsråd kunne hæve sanktionerne, er en absurditet. Irak ved det; vil vestverdenen indse det?

Den store amerikanske Cruiser får 200 l. benzin for 4 dollar(!). Vi møder stort set kun to slags lastbiler: De der kører med olje fra Irak til Jordan, og de der kører med andre varer, bl.a. meget hø. I løbet af dagene og månederne må det blive ikke så få fade af den førstnævnte vare, der forlader Irak.

BAGHDAD

Sammenlignet med Amman syder Baghdad af aktivitet. Butikkerne er åbne til langt ud på aftenen, og der handles livligt. Trafikken er intensiv og politidirigeret, nye og gamle biler kører rundt mellem hinanden. Når man kører langs de vældige boulevarder, ser man at butikkerne er fulde af kunder og varer. Det er en ret ren by og stemningen er afslappet. Man beregner at Bagdad har omkring 5 mil. indbyggere, en femtedel af Iraks befolkning.

Byen er moderne, men man ser let, med hensyn til renovering og vedligeholdelse, at den er en skygge af hvad den må have været. En del byggevirksomhed foregår hist og her, – ikke mindst ved en gigantisk moské, som det vil tage ti år at få færdig, – nye paladser, lejlighedshuse og offentlige bygninger. Man slås af Bagdads vældige størrelse og dens uendelige boulevarder med hurtig trafik, tusindvis af monumenter og billeder af Saddam Hussein samt mange moderne skulpturer og grandiøse mindespladser med dramatiske krigsmonumenter. Hist og her skimter man at byen ikke mangler charme, især nede ved Tigris; men jeg synes ikke at det er en storby der spejler dens imponerende historie, eller det at den har været en vugge for vores civilisation.

Irak har været et rigt og moderne samfund inspireret af Vesteuropa. Der har været små klasseforskelle, gode skoler og sygehuse, høj læsestandard og en god socioøkonomisk tryghed. Til forskel fra de fleste andre oliestater har irakerne investeret deres rigdom i deres egen velfærd og ikke sat pengene i schweitziske banker eller vestlige hotelkæder – hvad der måske er endnu en årsag til at USA er sur? Og det er et sekulariseret samfund. Men alt det har forandret sig på de 12 år, der er gået siden Gulf-krigen og oprettelsen af sanktionerne.

“BONDELANDET” OG DETS MENNESKER

Ude på landet er alt anderledes. På landevejen til Babylon ser man halvfærdige huse, vandanlægninger der ikke fungerer og pigtrådshegn, hvor alt metal er pillet af og kun de nøgne stolper står tilbage. Den typiske landsby er en række huse på begge sider af 4-fils vejen, med små butikker, der sælger cigaretter, kryderier og grønsager. Hist og her i sandet, støvet og snavsen bevæger sig mennesker, får og nogle få køer. Bilverksteder findes der naturligvis en overflod af. Man kan se store plantager, hvoraf nogle er forbavsende grønne, men der er også grå eller lysebrune marker, der tilsyneladende ikke har set vand i måneder. Beduinske mænd og kvinder i sorte eller hvide klæder bevæger sig langsomt sammen med sine fårehjorde. To mænd forsøger at reparere en vandpumpe i den trykkende hede, som nærmer sig de 50 grader.

Kvinder, helt klædt i sort – blot deres øjne er utildækkede, henter vand fra en kilde mens mændene drikker te og ryger under et træ. Sådan så disse mennesker ikke ud for 10 år siden, men nu tilbyder religionen åbenbart det eneste sikre ståsted. Nu og da ser jeg ubemandede vagttårne og soldater, dog ikke i stort antal, som kontrollerer checkpoints ved indfarten til større byer.

Jeg spørger mig selv om det bliver den slags landområder bagdadboerne må flygte til, når deres land bliver bombet og indvaderet. Hvor skulle de ellers flygte til under bomberne?

LEILA OG SALEH

FNs udviklingsprogram, UNDP, tager mig med ud til nogle mikrokredit-programmer. Leila sidder i rullestol og fortæller mig at hun for nylig har afsluttet sin uddannelse i computervidenskab ved den tekniske højskole i Babylon. Derefter ansøgte hun hos UNDP om at få et af programmets minilån, fik 750 US-dollar og blev godkendt af det irakiske erhvervsministerium. Nu leder hun kurser for alle slags studerende i sit lille kombinerede butik og klasseværelse.

Jeg besøge derefter Saleh, en ugift snedker, født 1964 uden ben. Han er ifærd med at reparere en ret stor rokokostol med lidt afskallet guldfarve på, da jeg træder ind i hans verksted. Han fik et startlån på 500 US-dollar af hvilke han betaler 25 dollar tilbage per måned. De vældige skabe han bygger, siddende og kravlende omkring på gulvet, koster ca. 80 dollar. Han har gode chanser for at kunne tilbagebetale lånet indenfor nogle år, efterhånden som hans virksomhed vokser sig større. Han har lige investeret i en sav, men hans højeste ønske for fremtiden er at kunne købe sig en rullestol, som koster omkring 75 US-dollar. Jeg forlader ham med en følelse af håb; han har en chanse for at få det bedre, eftersom han udfører fantastiske sager med sine hænder og arbejder hårdt. Jeg kan ikke undgå at se stoltheden og håbet i hans store brune øjne.

Her, ligesom overalt inklusive Bagdad, møder jeg kun venlige og velkomstønskende mennesker. Det ville ikke have forbavset mig, hvis jeg, som vesteuropeer eller amerikaner, var blevet anset som medskyldig i sanktionerne. Men jeg føler mig tryg overalt. Butiksejere byder mig ind, serverer te og viser stolt sine smukt ordnede varer frem. Den klassiske arabiske gæstfrihed og velkommende indstilling til fremmede har sandelig ikke ændret sig. Deres taknemmelighed og glæde, over at nogen er rejst så langt for at spørge dem om deres liv, er virkelig rørende.

Det er mennesker som Leila og Saleh jeg tænker på, når Bush vil bombe landet. Det er deres drømme og håb som krigen vil dræbe – ligesom den vil det for de øvrige 25 mil. uskyldige civile irakiske medborgere. Men Bush vil at du og jeg kun skal tænke på Saddam.

Det irakiske folk fortjener verdens sympati, ikke bomber. Jeg traf ikke en eneste international embedsmand eller nogen chef for en international mission, som i sanktionerne så et virksomt politisk redskab, eller at en invasion ville kunne løse flere problemer end den vil skabe.

Hvis jeg kan rejse til Irak, så kan andre det også – folkebevægelser, mediefolk, forskere. Gør det! Få kundskaber om andre sider af sagen, dem vi ellers aldrig får herhjemme.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...