PressInfo #207 – Tsunamien – den virkelige skandaleog hvad vi kan lære af den

Det udstiller falskheden i militærets retfærdiggørelse af sig selv som “forsvarer af liv”. Skyder man en politibetjent i USA, står man til dødsstraf. Men det, at have ansvaret for en stor del af de næsten 250.000 som døde under tsunamien ved at tilbageholde livsvigtig information fra dem betragtes ikke nu som en forbrydelse, selv om det er langt mere alvorligt.

Nogle af dem, der har mistet en slægtning eller en ven i tsunamien, burde anlægge en retssag mod dem, der vidste besked, men undlod at informere de mennesker, der var i fare, inklusive den militære øverstkommanderende på Diego Garcia og måske endda Pentagon.

Der er ikke store chancer for at de ville vinde retssagen, men den ville få en masse opmærksomhed og således hjælpe med at styrke debatten om militærets rolle i vor verden.

Den følgende artikel argumenterer for, at selv uden et officielt tsunamivarslingssystem i Det indiske Ocean, så kunne der være advaret i tide til mange af de ramte.

 

Hvad tsunamien lærer os

Udsendt via InterPress Service, 4. jan 2005.

I et interview på CNN den 2. januar blev chefen for NOAA i Colorado stillet det spørgsmål, som vi alle havde på læberne: Hvorfor blev der ikke udsendt nogen advarsel til de lande, der blev ramt af en tsunami, efter at NOAA havde opdaget det stærke jordskælv ud for Sumatras vestkyst den 26. december? Han svarede, at først og fremmest var der ikke et advarselssystem. Der var ingen i disse lande til at modtage budskabet. For det andet havde NOAA ikke en præcis model for tsunamien og havde ingen mulighed for at vide, hvor mange det blev nødvendigt at evakuere.

Nu behøver man ikke et dyrt varslingssystem for at få en mistanke om, at et jordskælv af størrelsen 9 under havet kunne risikere at efterfølges af en tsunami og at det ville sætte tusinder af menneskers liv i fare langs den tætbefolkede kyst ud mod epicenteret. Et jordskælv på 8.3 i Lituya Bay ved Alaskas kyst i 1958 havde givet en bølge på op til 516 meters højde, der vaskede træer ned fra bjergskråninger – heldigvis i et ubefolket område. Vist, det er ikke ethvert jordskælv under havet, der giver anledning til en tsunami, men forsigtighedsprincippet tilsiger os at forberede os på det værste, hvor der er selv en mindre risiko for en katastofe.

Selvom jobbeskrivelsen for de videnskabsmænd, der opdagede jordskælvet, ikke indeholder at udsende advarsler til de mennesker, hvis liv er i fare, så har de et moralsk ansvar for at gøre det. De havde måske ikke telefonnumre til de organer, der har ansvaret i de berørte lande. Men de kunne have informeret enhver, der kunne lade beskeden gå videre, selv midt i natten inklusive venner og slægtninge, de kunne have nået nogen mennesker i de berørte områder, som kunne have givet beskeden videre til andre. Hvis hver ringede 10 andre op, som derefter ringede til 10 andre, så kunne man i kun 9 led være oppe på 1 milliard mennesker. Selv om nogen ikke ville sende advarslen videre, ville der være andre, som gjorde det.

Folk uden telefon kunne være advaret af naboer. Radioudsendelser og internetbeskeder kunne også være opfanget af nogen, som kunne informere andre personligt eller pr (mobil)telefon. Helikoptere kunne have advaret med megafon langs de truede kyststrækninger.

Det er ubegribeligt at der ikke blev gjort noget i den retning.

Ville Du læse her nu
hvis Du ikke havde nytte af det?
Få flere kvalitets-artikler fra TFF i fremtiden

USAs udenrigsministerium kunne have kontaktet sine ambassader i regionen eller regeringerne direkte. Nogle regeringer fik information, men lod være med at handle ud fra den, på grund af risikoen for at skade turistindustrien. Det tog tsunamien 3 timer og 53 minutter at nå Sri Lanka, mindre tid for Thailand, men tid nok til en advarsel. Der er rigeligt med skyld at fordele.

Det er ikke nødvendigt at vide præcist, hvilke områder, der er i fare og skal evakueres. Hvilken fejl er mest alvorlig: at gå op i større højde end det viser sig at være nødvendigt eller at blive nede og drukne ?

For folk på Sumatras vestkyst var varslingstiden kort, kun ca 20 minutter for Banda Aceh en af de hårdest ramte byer. Ydermere blev en del telefonledninger ødelagt. Men man kunne lære folk at et stort jordskælv ofte følges af ødelæggende bølger. De, der ikke blev skadet af selv jordskælvet, kunne så have taget sig til en mere sikker grund.

Uvidenhed kan dræbe og uddannelse kan frelse liv. Et godt eksempel er re-hydreringsbehandling. En spiseskefuld sukker og en teskefuld salt blandet med en liter kogt vand givet teskefuldevis til en person med diarre, fremkaldt af tyfus eller kolera, kan redde dem fra døden. Før kendskabet til den enkle løsning blev udbredt, døde en 30 – 40 % af kolerapatienterne. I epidemien i Peru i 1991, hvor folk kendte til tricket, var det under 1 % af de smittede, der døde.

Det er velkomment, at mange regeringer og personer har bidraget med store summer til redningsarbejdet. Men det udgør stadig kun 1 promille af det årlige militærbudget i verden. Der er brug for meget mere og det kan skaffes, før flere liv tabes til tørst, sult, sår og sygdomme.

I denne enorme tsunamiulykke ved vi allerede (4. januar) at over 15.000 er døde, titusinder savnes og mange flere vil dø af sygdomme fremkaldt af at drikke forurenet drikkevand. (Per 20. januar er dødstallet revideret op til 250.000). Disse umådelige lidelser, som er dækket godt af pressen har for en gangs skyld vist størrelsesordenen på den strukturelle vold, som normalt går urapporteret: anslået 125,000 mennesker om dagen eller 45 millioner om året, flest børn og ældre, dør unødvendigt af sult og sygdomme, der kunne forebygges i vores verden af overflod.

Hvad forbrugere i Vesten bruger på is, kosmetik og dyremad slår til til at skaffe tilstrækkelig mad og sundhedspleje til alle de mennesker i verden, der mangler det !

Lad os fordoble vore anstrengelser for at afslutte denne horrible uretfærdighed.

* Dietrich Fischer. European University Center for Peace Studies, Stadtschlaining, Østrig, meddirektør i TRANSCEND, et freds og udviklingsnetværk.

Oversat af Orla Jordal, www.jordals.dk, som en public service.

 

Få gratis artikler og info fra TFF

© TFF and the author 2005

 

 

mail
Tell a friend about this article

Send to:

From:

Message and your name

 

 You are welcome to reprint, copy, archive, quote or re-post this item, but please retain the source.

 

Would you – or a friend – like to receive TFF PressInfo by email?

 

 

 

 

S P E C I A L S & F O R U M S

Iraq Forum

Gandhi & India

Burundi Forum

Photo galleries

Nonviolence Forum

TFF News Navigator

Become a TFF Friend

TFF Online Bookstore

Reconciliation project

EU conflict-management

Make an online donation

Foundation update and more

TFF Peace Training Network

Make a donation via bank or postal giro

Basic menu below

 

Related Posts

The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...