PressInfo #67 – KOSOVSKI PRINCIPI – Grupe G 8 JOS JEDNA PREVARA S MIROVNIM PLANOM

“Ministri inostranih poslova zemalja G8 izdali su
deklaraciju o principima na osnovu kojih treba da se resi
kriza na Kosovu. To je mesavina raznorodnih elemenata koji
sluze da spasu obraz Zapada a ne doticu se ni jednog
jedinog od uzroka same krize a ni uzroka zbog kojih Zapad
kao medijator do sad nije imao uspeha. kaze direktor TFF-a
Jan Oberg. Ova deklaracija moze da posluzi jedino zato da
opravda nastavak bombardovanja, a ako se ipak primeni,
obecava vrlo tuznu buducnost za citavi Balkan. No, jedne
stvari ipak imamo u izobilju, nepismenosti u konfliktima,
pa nam danas vodeci mediji i ovo nazivaju Mirovnim planom
ponavljajuci tako gresku iz Rambujea. U prilogu imate
celoviti tekst Principa G 8 kako ih je objavio BBC, 6. maja
99. 

– – – – –

“Sledeci opsti principi moraju biti usvojeni i
primenjeni u resavanju krize na Kosovu:

* Trenutna i lako proveriva obustava nasilja i represije
na Kosovu.

* Povlacenje s Kosova vojnih, policijskih i paravojnih
snaga.

* Razmestanje na Kosovu efikasnog medjunarodnog civilnog
i bezbednosnog prisustva, o kojem treba da odluce i da ga
podrze Ujedinjene Nacije, sposobnog da osigura postizanje
opstih ciljeva.

* Uspostavljanje prelazne uprave za Kosovo, o kojoj ce
odluciti Savet bezbednosti Ujedinjenih Naroda, a koja treba
da osigura uslove za miran i normalan zivot za sve
stanovnike Kosova.

* Siguran i slobodan povratak za sve izbeglice i
raseljena lica i nesmetani pristup Kosovu za sve
organizacije za humanitarnu pomoc.

* Politicki proces usmeren ka uspostavi prelaznih
politickih okvira. Sporazum koji ce osigurati znacajnu
samoupravu za Kosovo uz puno postovanje Sprazuma iz
Rambujea i principa i suvereniteta i teritorijalnog
integriteta SR Jugoslavije i drugih drzava regiona i
demilitarizaciju OVK.

* Sveobuhvatan pristup ekonomskom razvoju i stabilizaciji
kriznog podrucja.

– – – –

Evo vam 10 razloga zasto ovu Deklaraciju mozemo da
smatramo samo za jos jednu mirovnu prevaru:

1. Ministri ovo nazivaju kriza, a ne konflikt ili rat.
Time naglasavaju svoju nameru da naprave obrazac za
spasavanje vlastitog obraza zbog krize koju je stvorio NATO
balkanskom bombarderskom brljotinom. Ljudi u Jugoslaviji
(SRJ), Kosovari posebno a i susedne zemlje to sagledavaju
kao konflikt koji je eksplodirao u rat i agresiju. Principi
ni ne dodiriju ni jedan od dubokih korena samog sukoba i u
zizu svoje paznje nisu uzeli ni jednu potrebu ljudi koji
zive u ovom regionu.

2. Potpuno izbegavaju bilo kakvo pominjanje NATO-ovog
bombardovanja i uslove pod kojima bi ono eventualno moglo
da prestane.

3. Prva stvar koju ministri spominju je povlacenje SRJ
snaga (kojih, svih ili samo nekih, odakle i kuda?) a
zavrsavaju sa opstom odrednicom (kasnijeg) razoruzanja OVK
i to pod tackom politicki proces. Ovim se u potpunosti
nastavlja neuravnotezenost – koju je prosle godine uneo
ambasador Holbruk – u odnosima s dve sukobljene
strane-snage u gradjanskom ratu.

4. Ne govore se nista da li sve ili samo neke snage SRJ
treba da se povuku. Oni pominju demilitarizaciju OVK, no
moze li uopste postojati vojska bez oruzja? Ako moze, nije
li to onda podrska Vladi u kojoj ce dominirati OVK – ionako
nedavno formirane izvan Ustava i politickih okvira
Kosova?

5. Ministri izbegavaju da definisu medjunarodno
prisustvo, mada izraz medjunarodno civilno i bezbednosno
sam za sebe doista predstavlja znacajan otklon od jedino
NATO pa predvodjene NATO-om i medjunarodne bezbednosne
snage s jezgrom od NATO-a. Dobro je da su UN konacno dobile
neku ulogu da odigraju, no da li ce one ovde biti
predvodnik ili samo talac s gumenim pecatom u ruci?

6. Mesta koja se odnose na teritorijalni integritet i
suverenitet SRJ su jednostavno nedovoljna. Deklaracijom se
ne pominje da ce se SRJ pitati, konsultovati o pitanjima
njene vlastite buducnosti. Vece bezbednosti UN-a ce
odluciti o prelaznoj upravi i prelaznom politickom okviru
koji ce u celosti ispostovati sprazum iz Rambujea. A taj je
ugrozio i integritet i suverenitet SRJ i uopste nije ni bio
nikakav sporazum.

7. Ministri kao da veruju da je ono sto je potrebno da se
donese mir ovom regionu prelazna uprava za Kosovo, a ne
socijalo-psiholoske na pojedincima zasnovane mere na
uspostavi mirovnog procesa. Time se nastavlja
katastrofalni, od vrha ka bazi inzenjering ili menadzerski
pristup konfliktu u kojem je neophodan preokret usmeren ka
konsultacijama, uspostavi poverenja i ozivljavanju civilnog
drustva koja svima treba.

8. Najzanimljivije u deklaraciji je to sto ni recju ne
pominje poimenicno: a) lokalne i regionalne mere na
uspostavi medjusobnog poverenja, b) konsultacije sa SRJ,
OVK-UCK i dr. Rugovom, c) pregovore koji bi se vodili
izmedju tvrdih jezgri sukobljenih strana i d) balkanski
regionalni pristup i procese.

9. Ministri izbegavaju da pomenu bilo kakvo zaljenje, a
jos manje izvinjenje narodima Jugoslavije za pale civilne
zrtve i nastalu stetu – cime zalosno propustaju dobru
priliku da otvore vrata pomirenja izmedju NATO zemalja i 10
miliona gradjana SRJ. Uz potpuni nedostatak samokritike i
sazaljenja, G-8 ipak veruju da ce se NATO zemlje izvuci
nekaznjene za to sto prvo nisu uspele da sprece nasilje,
zatim sto su pristrasnim posredovanjem i agresijom same sebe
onemogucile da budu ono sto sad zele da postanu, a to je
ovlasteni mirotvorci od poverenja!

10. Sa tako puno elementarnih pitanja na koja se
propustilo da se odgovori i s toliko puno neodredjenosti,
SRJ ce verovatno traziti pojasnjenja ili ce reci ne – a
onda ce NATO moci s punim legitimitetom da nastavi da
bombarduje one koji eto nastavljaju da odbacuju mirovne
principe.

Ovaj dokument ne uspeva da otvori ni jedna od vrata za
istinskog resavanja sukoba. On se ne odnosi ni na jedan od
izvornih korena srpsko-albanskog sukoba, a ni jos gore
regionalne i svetske krize koju je svojom katastrofalnom
politikom NATO izazvao.

Zamagljivanjem, omaskama, nedorecenoscu, kontradikcijama
i potpunim nedostatkom bilo kakvog izraza zaljenja zbog
patnji ljudi – izrazene su duboke podele koje stoje medju
tvorcima ovog nacrta. Rusija se ukrcala na ovaj brod – ako
jeste – samo zato sto joj je Zapad vazniji nego Kosovo.
Iznenadilo bi me ako Jugoslavija ovo shvati ikako drukcije
nego kao praznu deklaraciju. Tragicno je da najmocniji
svetski lideri nisu ni dan danas naucili nijednu lekciju o
razresavanju sukoba. Da parafraziram Ajnstajna, – Posle 24.
marta s NATO-ovim bombardovanjem nista vise nije isto osim
jedne stvari – nacina na koji mocni lideri razmisljaju o
sukobime i o miru a to nas sigurno vodi u nove i nove
katastrofe, predvidja Jan Oberg.

© TFF 1999

• You are welcome to re-print, copy, archive, quote
from or re-post this item, but please retain the source.

• TFF’s website has all the relevant links to Iraq,
the Balkans, including media there + peace research, and
non-violence

• Teacher, activist, journalist?? You’ll always find
something interesting at TFF.

• Get your daily global news from the leading media
on TFF’s site, all in one place.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...