PressInfo #37 – Good News from Eastern Slavonia, Croatia

“Most of what you hear from Croatia and the Balkans
nowadays is negative. The good news is that it is possible
to bring young Croats and Serbs together and help them
develop an atmosphere of trust, tolerance and
reconciliation. It gives us hope,” says Jan Oberg, head of
TFF’s conflict-mitigation team, returning from the
foundation’s 30th mission to what was once
Yugoslavia.

Last month TFF conducted a series of reconciliation
seminars in Eastern Slavonia with 120 Croat and Serb
gymnasium students from Vukovar, Osijek and Vinkovci. For
most of them it was the first time they left “their” town
and met “the other side.” Various techniques such as fish
bowl, role play, groups discussions and brainstorming were
used. The students got to know each other and exchanged
views, made friends and sang songs. They cried when anyone
who so wanted told about the hurt and pain and what he or
she had experienced during the war; they did so with
statements like “I experienced, in my family…” and NOT
with statement like “you did this to us…” They did a
brainstorm and produced fascinating ideas and visions about
a peaceful Croatia, Eastern Slavonia and Vukovar. They
unanimously told us that many more ought to participate in
seminars like this: parents, politicians, journalists as
well as hardliners, war profiteers and people with little
education, as some of them said.

“It took Croat and Serb students less than an hour to
find out that they have a lot in common, in contrast to what
they have been told by their government, the media and often
their parents since 1991. Far the majority of those we
worked with told us directly and indirectly that they share
more with each other than with many among their own
nationality,” Jan Oberg continues.

“We didn’t want this war, those in power have stolen a
good part of our childhood. We cannot hate each other just
because someone tells us to hate. We have to meet and shape
our own opinions. Perhaps we cannot forget but we can learn
to forgive; if we forget, it could happen again. The
‘others’ are human beings like us, and we’d like to meet
them more frequently,” they told us repeatedly.

What the majority want is better schools and a much more
modern, well-financed educational system; they want places
to be together, employment opportunities, freedom to travel
and work; sports and culture activities, rock concerts – the
profits from which, they suggested, should go to the
re-building of Vukovar. They felt that politicians were
mostly playing their own games and not caring about the
young generation after the war. Many want to stay in Eastern
Slavonia or somewhere else in Croatia but do not feel that
the opportunities are promising.

“Their vision of peace includes open borders, another
type of police and military, if any. Some want to do
newspapers and a radio station together and for all
nationalities. Some want a peace and culture boat sailing
down the Danube. Very strongly: they long to be normal youth
and reach out to their Central European peers. What they see
around them is the opposite of their visions and hopes. Many
consider the newly independent state of Croatia quite
backward and nationalistic still, they feel that they have
little opportunity to develop their talents. It was
surprising for us to see that quite a few, Croats and Serbs
alike, would leave for other countries in Europe or for the
United States if they got the chance.”

Some students were prevented from participating in TFF’s
seminar by their parents. A minority wrote statements in
their evaluation such as “we can never live together” or
“the Serbs still don’t understand that Croatia is our
country and they better leave” or “Croats are obsessed with
nationalism.” Even if this was their honest view, these
young people listened and talked with each other in a
respectful and dignified manner.

“We must not forget that for many of them the war and
their refugee life has been extremely painful and left deep
scars. Many commented that it helped a lot to speak openly
about it and to feel that somebody cared and listened. The
fact that it went so well is extremely encouraging,” says
Jan Oberg and continues:

“I can’t help wondering: Why did the UN, OSCE, and
human rights organisations not do this systematically when
they were here in the thousands? Why is it not done today to
prevent new violent conflicts in the future? Do
international organisations at all understand the potential
for reconciliation and peace that young people represent –
potentially the future leaders it war-torn societies? Why
did neither Croatia nor the international community develop
a post-UN peacebuilding strategy? Why is Eastern Slavonia
forgotten in the media?

TFF and several local NGOs would like to do much more –
but it is so difficult to find the small sums needed for
this type of education. Croatia itself spends a lot of
resources on the police and military and the luxurious life
style in Zagreb contrasts, to say the least, with the
conditions of the schools in Eastern Slavonia, Vukovar in
particular. And the international community spends enormous
sums on arming new states or imposing market economy. It
would be helpful if some of them put people first,” says dr.
Oberg.

We have had 7 missions in Eastern Slavonia during the 18
months and we can see the changes, also among ministerial
representatives, principals and teachers. But these students
– admittedly some of the best educated in the country – are
much more ready and “peace competent” than the majority of
politicians we have met. It is amazing that all this
positive energy gets very little support from within Croatia
as well as from the international community. So much needs
to be done now. If the young citizens we met do become
leaders in the future, there is hope. Will anybody nurse
their aspirations and help them to stay and realise their
potential in time?”

What did TFF do? How did it plan and implement this
reconciliation process in cooperation with the Croatian
government? Exactly what did the students say about the
experience and about the future they wish to see? How did
the students evaluate TFF’s seminars and teachers? 

Read about it all in “Eastern
Slavonia: TFF seminars with 120 Serb and Croat Gymnasium
Students a Success. Report and Students’ Comments
” –
freely available, for your to print out.

Peace & future researcher + ‌Art Photographer

Related Posts

The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Jan Oberg May 15, 2026 Go to this Fox News page and scroll the whole way down: President Donald Trump tells the world that his meeting with President Xi Jinping yielded a lot of very concrete political and economic results – of course, only where the Chinese side, according to him, agreed with him. He does not mention the Taiwan issue, but Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, says that it did not feature prominently in their talks and that the US policy on Taiwan has not changed. Then go to China Daily – or Global Times – and you will see that for the Chinese it is framework, principles, structure of cooperation etc. that matters – all embedded in the overall idea of “constructive bilateral relationship of strategic stability.” Nowhere is any concrete agreement or deal – all that Trump refers to – mentioned. At the general level, this gives you insights into the very different social...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...