President Trump’s insulting and demeaning speech at the UNGA

And why the world, especially the EU, must now declare itself independent of the United States.

UN’s 80th anniversary

This year, the United Nations celebrates the 80th anniversary of its founding. The UN was formed after the scourge of the Second World War, in which 70 to 85 million people were killed and many countries were destroyed. That war came on the heels of the First World War, which also killed between 15 and 22 million people.

After the Second World War, especially after the use of nuclear weapons by the United States, which marked a turning point in the history of warfare that could result in the end of civilisation as we know it, humanity decided to move away from the era of empires and big power politics and usher in a new era of peace, freedom and cooperation. These were the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. The United States played a leading role in the establishment of both the League of Nations and the United Nations.

With the establishment of the United Nations, many nations hoped that it would mark a turning point in world history and would not repeat the mistakes of the League of Nations. At the same time, there was a great deal of public optimism about an era of universal peace and prosperity, combined with greater freedoms and equality throughout the world.

As we move away from the Second World War, we see the erosion of those ideals and the rise of new hegemonic powers. Now, many people have come to believe that we are repeating the mistakes of the 1930s and the early 1940s.

The world is moving towards greater disunity, nuclear rearmament and the pursuit of narrow national interests at the expense of universal peace. This is why the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the establishment of the United Nations is of great significance and provides an opportunity to remind us of the horrors of world wars and inspire us with a renewed determination to put an end to wars forever.

Gaza genocide

In retaliation for the terrorist attacks by Hamas on 7 October 2023, Israeli forces carried out an unprecedented genocide in Gaza, killing and maiming tens of thousands (according to some estimates, hundreds of thousands) of Palestinians, mainly women and children. They have turned almost the whole of the Gaza Strip into rubble, and have displaced over two million Palestinians, most of them multiple times.

Israeli forces have killed at least 248 Palestinian journalists and more than 500 aid workers, alongside at least 1,500 health workers. They have destroyed most hospitals and all universities and schools, killing most of their staff. These are unprecedented crimes. Israel has killed more journalists in the past two years than were killed during the First and Second World Wars, and the Korean and Vietnamese wars combined.

As Senator Bernie Sanders pointed out, ‘Many legal experts have now concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. The International Association of Genocide Scholars concluded that “Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide.” The Israeli human rights groups B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel have reached the same conclusion, as have international groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.’ (1)

Growing trend in recognising a Palestinian state

In view of over seventy years of illegal occupation of Palestinian lands and the construction of a growing number of illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, culminating in the Gaza genocide, more and more countries have decided to recognise a Palestinian state on the 80th anniversary of the establishment of the United Nations, with the number of those that have already done so exceeding 159.

Therefore, for many reasons, the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the establishment of the United Nations in New York were of supreme international significance and demanded serious and sober speeches, marking this important landmark in recent history. Many participants at UNGA were anxious to learn what the president of the United States had to see on these weighty issues.

United Nations Secretary-General’s speech at the General Assembly

The proceedings of the UNGA started with a speech by the United Nations Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres. (2) In his speech, he stressed the importance of the occasion and the steps that world leaders must take to prevent a global catastrophe. In a part of his speech, he said:

“Eighty years ago, in a world scorched by World War II, leaders made a choice:

Cooperation over chaos, law over lawlessness, peace over conflict. That choice gave birth to the United Nations.

Eighty years on, we confront a choice again: What kind of world do we choose to build together?

We must choose peace rooted in international law.
We must choose human dignity and human rights.
We must choose climate justice.
We must choose to put technology at the service of humanity.
And we must choose to strengthen the UN for the 21st century.

Now is the time to choose, and it is not enough to know what the right choices are; we must make them.”

He went on to say that the U.N.’s founders faced the same questions 80 years ago that we face today, but that the choice of peace or war, law or lawlessness, cooperation or conflict, is “more urgent, more intertwined, more unforgiving.” He rightly warned: “We have entered in an age of reckless disruption and relentless human suffering. The pillars of peace and progress are buckling under the weight of impunity, inequality and indifference.”

The UN Secretary General used his strongest words against Israel’s actions in Gaza, saying that the scale of death and destruction is the worst in his nearly nine years as secretary-general, and that “nothing can justify the collective punishment of the Palestinian people.”

This was a speech which stressed the importance of the occasion and the need for a new beginning in international relations.

President Donald Trump’s speech at the General Assembly

Guterres’s speech was followed by President Trump’s speech. (3) Trump spoke for 57 minutes, instead of the 15 minutes allotted to him, which is a sign of his disregard for rules.

The first thing that the president said was to complain about the malfunctioning of the escalator and the teleprompter. Ignoring the UN Secretary General, the president of the General Assembly and many dignitaries present in the hall, Trump started his speech with the following words: “Hello, Madam First Lady. Thank you very much for being here, and Madam President, Mr. Secretary-General, First Lady of the United States, distinguished delegates, ambassadors, and world leaders.”

At the international podium, addressing world leaders, he attacked his predecessor, President Joe Biden, in the strongest and most insulting terms. He referred to him nine times, directly or indirectly, accusing him of leading “the most corrupt, incompetent administration in history.”

A great part of his address concentrated on his own alleged achievements. He highlighted his administration’s counter-cartel mission in the waters around Latin America. It should be noted that his activities on the high seas have included attacking three Venezuelan boats, over 1,000 miles away from US shores, killing 11 in one and fewer numbers in the other two, accusing them of drug trafficking without any evidence. Even if they were involved in drug trafficking, they should have been arrested and tried, not executed in international waters. These are serious crimes, with the US Navy acting as judge, jury and executioner on the high seas.

In addition to signalling absolute contempt for the US’s allies and for global institutions, Trump commanded other nations to cease combating climate change. He described what he called “the global warming hoax” and mass migration as the two key threats to international peace, security, and prosperity. He said that if other countries end immigration and green energy policies, they could turn their “failing” countries into enviable successes.

Despite the almost unanimous views of scientists about climate change and global warming, he called climate change “the greatest con job ever.” He claimed that UN predictions “were wrong”.

Apart from the fact that his assertions are not backed by science, he harmed US interests in trying to provide new technologies for the rest of the world, and enhanced China’s role as the front-runner in sponsoring clean energy.

In fact, since the start of his second term, Trump has cancelled much of the US’s policy support for clean energy and has withdrawn from international cooperation to address the climate crisis, leaving the climate community shellshocked.

While most European governments had stopped buying much cheaper Russian oil and gas and had instead bought much more expensive US products, he criticised their failure to completely “cut off” Russian energy products as “embarrassing”.

Addressing an assembly whose main mission is to strengthen and maintain peace, Trump threatened to unshackle the U.S. military from international law. He said, “Our military has increased substantially in size. We spent $2.5 trillion over the last four years on our military. We have the most powerful military anywhere in the world, and it’s not even close.”

He claimed that he had attracted the greatest amount of foreign investment to the United States. Again, returning to the issue of the incompetence of his predecessor, he said: “In four years of President Biden, we had less than $1 trillion of new investment into the United States. In just eight months since I took office, we have secured commitments and money already paid for $17 trillion. Think of it, four years less than a trillion, eight months, much more than $17 trillion is being invested in the United States and is now pouring in from all parts of the world… In my first term, I built the greatest economy in the history of the world. We had the best economy ever in the history of the world, and I’m doing the same thing again, but this time it’s actually much bigger and even better. The numbers far surpassed my record-setting first term.”

He again repeated his claim that he had ended seven conflicts, adding: “Likewise, in a period of just seven months, I have ended seven unendable wars. They said they were unendable. You’re never gonna get them solved. Some were going for 31 years, two of them, 31, think of it, 31 years. One was 36 years, one was 28 years. I ended seven wars.” For these great achievements, he said, “Everyone says that I should get the Nobel Peace Prize for each one of these achievements.”

From the UN podium, he criticised the UN, questioning its purpose, and accused it of funding the migration crisis. He said the organisation needs to change and move away from the principles on which it was founded. “Not only is the UN not solving the problems it should, too often, it is actually creating new problems for us to solve.”

Without providing any evidence, he accused the United Nations of funding an assault on Western countries and their borders, adding, “The UN is supposed to stop invasions, not create them and not finance them.”

He insulted all European countries, accusing them of facilitating an “invasion” of Western countries, adding that the continent is in “serious trouble” over migration.

He particularly insulted Britain and London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, saying: “I am looking at London. It has a terrible mayor, a terrible, terrible mayor. It has been so changed, so changed. Now they want to go to Sharia law.”

Trump’s administration has cut UN funds, sanctioned many members of important UN organisations, such as the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, has withdrawn the United States from many vital UN bodies, such as WHO, UNHRC, and UNESCO. The US has constantly undermined the United Nations, refused a visa to the head of the Palestinian Authority whose people have been subjected to an unprecedented genocide but spread the red carpet for the perpetrator of that genocide who has been indicted as a war criminal by the world’s highest criminal court.

Needless to say, he proposed no solution for ending the genocide in Gaza and merely demanded that remaining Israeli hostages must be released. They would have been released long ago, if Netanyahu had not violated the ceasefire agreement that President Trump himself had proposed and Hamas had agreed to.

Many American commentators have spoken of their embarrassment at Trump’s rambling speech. However, at such a critical time in world history, when mankind is facing daunting and maybe existential threats, most people expect more from an American president who commands the world’s most powerful armed forces. This total disconnect from reality by a man in his position is dangerous.

Time for the world to declare independence from the United States

Maybe the time has come for the world, especially the European countries, to admit that the emperor has no clothes, declare their independence from the United States and find collective responses to global problems. The solutions must not be based only on Western interests, but should also consider the Global South. With the current policies pursued by the United States, Europe and their adversaries, the world is heading for a devastating war.

For the first time since the Second World War, the European space is a theatre of a devastating proxy war between NATO and Russia. Apart from massive death and destruction in Ukraine and Gaza, things can get out of hand and result in the Third World War. The genocide in Gaza, which has turned most of the Arab and Islamic states against Israel and its Western backers, must end and a way to a lasting peace in the region must be found.

European leaders are well-placed to influence the course of both conflicts and bring peace and sanity to Europe and the Middle East. There is no need to act as blind followers of the Trump administration, even at the cost of their own survival.

The question is will they continue on the current hazardous course, or try to stop the slide towards another global conflagration. The enormity of the problems requires serious decisions, strong leadership and a universal outlook. They Europeans can be US’s allies and friends, but not its vassals. Otherwise, we are all doomed.

End Notes

(1) Bernie Sanders, It is Genocide

(2)

Related Posts

Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...