This is a chapter in a TFF anthology in the making
“If You Want To Understand China.”

Foreword, Introduction, Authors and Table of Content here.

China has had an unprecedented development in the last 4 decades. It cannot be disputed. The progress list is long and covers absolutely everything, literally all walks of life, from on pavements to in space, from schools to research, from microchips to quantum computing, from one child to many and on and on.

In several fields, though, China remains stable: the culture, the hard work and the commitment to The Project, the project for a shared future for humankind.

It is a fact that the West is in decline, and China is on the rise. Relatively speaking, it is logical because that is how it is in zero-sum games. But is it really a zero-sum game? I do not think so; the cake can be baked bigger. It needs to be baked bigger with the increase in the global population. The zero-sum thinking is in line with the black-and-white thinking: There is no such thing; there are lots of colours in between. (It has been estimated that humans can distinguish approximately 10 million different colours from each other.)

This brings me to the conclusion that even if China is rising, the West could also be rising. Why, then, is the West declining?

My understanding of it can be condensed to the fact that China has a Project while, in contrast, the West has no Project.

The China Project is more than 5000 years old. No matter the dynasty, governance, or comings and goings, the kernel of the culture has been – and is – kept. Now, approximately 1,4 billion people contribute to the project. That is powerful.

It is based on:

• A family thinking, filial piety, respect and trust. These were key elements for survival in ancient times, and they still work. The family thinking is implemented in all layers of the Chinese ”onion.”

• Meritocracy, as from Plato’s The State. There is a very sophisticated system of selection to put the best person on the next step on the educational and later bureaucratic/governance ladder. The rulers rule because they are best at that, the workers work because they are best at that. Decisions are taken in a thousand-year perspective.

• Peace brings prosperity; war brings disparity. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been called the biggest peace project ever launched. Currently, 140+ countries take part and benefit from it, representing 2/3 of the world population. All in a win-win context. Common development of infrastructure, trade and other types of cooperation can make the nations feel more secure and seek disarmament rather than confrontation and armament.

• “It does not matter if the cat is black or white as long as it catches mice.” It is accepted to make money in China, much money, billions. The billionaires create jobs, and they can only eat one breakfast a day. However, according to the governance principle and the general culture of win-win, greed is not “inside”. And to challenge “Beijing’s” power is definitely “outside”.

• The Century of Humiliation stretches from the First Opium War (1839-1842) to the end of the civil war. This tragedy is driving the nation on full string. What the West did to China shall never happen again.

• Hard work. 1400 million people x hard work – and in the same direction or, say, in the at any time given directions – results in an enormously powerful movement forward.

• Modernisation, not Westernisation. China has been looking to the West and copying, testing and modifying to what suits their system and culture in a beneficial way. Not only technology and style, but also political doctrines and ideas: This and that but always “with Chinese characteristics”.

• Global initiatives. Over the very recent years, China has presented a series of global initiatives:

GSI – Global Security Initiative, which stays committed to the vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security, respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries.

GDI – Global Development Initiative, calling on the international community to accelerate implementation of the 2030 SDGs for more robust, greener and more balanced global development.

GCI – Global Civilisation Initiative advocates respect for the diversity of civilisations, the common values of humanity, the importance of inheritance and innovation of civilisations, and robust international people-to-people exchanges and cooperation.

And, of course, the Belt & Road Initiative, BRI.

This is China summarised in a few points. Add to that that the Chinese have far more trust in their governance and authorities than citizens in all other countries. Furthermore, China is not on a mission to spread its system; it does not seek hegemony. Things work, and a Chinese proverb makes this point: Do not change what works.

How is the West doing? Not so well, I am afraid, it’s lagging behind. It does not have a Project. Some of the symptoms are a lack of political leadership, failing diplomatic skill, a colonialist attitude, a hollowed-out democracy, and short-lived politicians putting re-election first. Further, endless discussions on all levels because individual rights and principles often result in upholding decisions for years and decades, wasting time, losing money and breaking progress – as well as attacking opponents, fake news and narratives – in short, overall negativity.

Being basically the extended arm of Washington, Europe’s position is difficult; it will split when faced with the real question of whom to support: the USA, the EU itself or China? Henry Kissinger asked, “Who to call in Europe?” A lot can be said about von der Leyen, her background, mission and attitude, but she does not have an easy task. Her leading job is like a farmer carrying a bundle of sticks that point in different directions.

The significant economic drivers, Germany and France, are trying to protect their domestic and vital industries while Hungary and Poland are against most of what comes from Brussels challenges the right to self-determination and all the other members with their different – perhaps minor, but for them essential – issues.

On top of this, the EU faces challenges from the US concerning the Build Back Better Act and the Green Act. So, seen from the outside – from the rest of the world – the EU is in chaos.

The US is running a trade war with China, and the EU does not know what to do in relation to that war or with China. Perhaps that is natural since the EU doesn’t even seem to know what to do with itself. These factors summarise the West’s troublesome position when it tries to move forward these days.

In my view, all this clearly points in one direction: If the West wants fair trade, a win-win context, as well as peace and prosperity, it ought to cooperate with China!

That, however, would be a blow to the Military-Industrial Complex (MIC), of course, but that choice must be made.

There are problems worldwide – small and big, in every family, in every country, and so too in China. One main difference in addressing them is that the West focuses on the problems while the Chinese focus on the possibilities, the solutions, and the future.

The West is split and does not have a collective project. China has.

The Chinese sign for crises contains two words: 危机 – danger and possibilities.

Which one would you choose?

1972-2003 IT and business-related education by IBM in economy, sales, marketing and business development.1971-1972 Military service1968-1971 Gymnasium, mathematics and physics1965-1968 High-school

Related Posts

Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...

Recent Articles

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Read More
Living-Peace-Sign-Budapest-copy
Tony Robinson October 4, 2026 Violence is easy to recognise when someone is being beaten, shot or killed. It becomes more difficult when nobody is holding a weapon. Poverty, discrimination, exploitation and repression can restrict a human life just as effectively, although they do so in very different ways and with very different consequences. Simply adding more categories to an ever-growing list of forms of violence does not really solve the problem. The more interesting question is what all these different situations have in common and why it makes sense to describe them using the same word. Human beings do not simply react to what happens around them. They remember the past, imagine things that do not yet exist, make plans and undertake projects. Workers organise because they imagine different working conditions; people migrate because they imagine another life somewhere else; social movements emerge because people refuse to accept the...
b54a1f10-8c65-4f0b-9dd5-4abc0a7d04cc_2659x2659
It’s a matter of principles, courage, vision and pulling together – while the militarist world is falling apart… Peter Langille October 3, 2026 “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?”The Bertrand Russell—Albert Einstein Manifesto, July 9, 1955 ⁕ The forecast for what’s ahead is worrisome. The sharp rise in armed conflicts over the past three years is adding to what was already the highest level in over seventy years. Genocides, which should be prevented are supported. A shared climate emergency that jeopardises survival is ignored. Diverse polls now suggest that people are war-weary, worried and interested in a more effective United Nations. And, there are viable policy options for a more secure world! Yet governments are doubling-down, betting on more war and investing heavily. If current trends persist,...
010
Johan Galtung 1930-2024October 2015 Published here on October 3, 2026 Let us focus on Civilization for conflict analysis and remedies. Major forms of disorder use violence; war is state organized violence. The most belligerent states are the United States of America and Israel, both with civilization roots. National Evangelism, the US Protestant Christian civilization– more national than evangelical–justifies US warfare as exceptionalism of a people chosen by God, with a manifest destiny to run the world. Orthodox Judaism justifies Israeli warfare to conquer and expand from Nile to Euphrates as a religious right and duty to the Eternal One. The third most belligerent country, the UK, no longer believes it is God-chosen but chosen by the USA; not quite the same but something. But the root cause of global disorder lies in the Occident–with Islam–seeing itself as the single, universal civilization valid for all at all times, all others being...
Screenshot 2026-10-02 011738
Jan ObergPhD, director, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFFLund, Sweden October 2, 2026 This is my full original manuscript. The Chinese Academy of Social Science, CASS, makes two publications out if it. 1. China’s Five-year plan emphasized the capabilities of basic research and original innovation. It is regarded as the goal of the future social development, which, as required, should be significantly enhanced. Can you comment on the importance of original innovation in research and academic study? I believe it is easier to define “original innovation” in the natural sciences than in social sciences. The breaking points of what constitutes something new, or innovative, are not quite as sharp in the latter. But in both fields it is about opening up something that was closed, unseen, unexplored before – making manifest what was earlier latent. Innovations come in many forms and shapes – naming something that was not...
arctic-circle-map
The agreement is catastrophic both because of what it says and what it doesn’t mention. It reduces further the major asset of security policies: Freedom of action. Jan Oberg TFF director September 25, 2026 A couple of hours before the agreement was signed on September 22, 2026, I published the following 13 hypotheses about what it would most likely contain on TFF Substack (in English). I was wrong on only the first point. Contrary to what Trump had written on his Truth Social platform, it does not appear to come into force immediately. In fact, it turned out to be worse than even I had anticipated. After these hypotheses now come a number of reflections in light of what the agreement actually contains, and does not contain, as well as the way in which it has generally been presented by major media outlets and by the public-service broadcaster DR. My...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...