State Terrorism / Terrorism, USA / Iraq, Israel / Palestine Right Now

johangaltung

[1]  When somebody declares “War on Terrorism” any counter-war should come as no surprise.  War is a two-way street as Anglo-Americans and Israelis with their punishment expeditions and military intervention against peoples unable to hit back are now learning. Today they hit back, military and civilians against military and civilians; USA-UK killing by far most. Terrorists possess less destructive force than the state terrorists, but their societies are more vulnerable.  Thus, a nonviolent Muslim strike in some of them will have a major impact.

[2]  This also applies to members of the “US-led coalition” with military deployment in Afghanistan and Iraq like Spain. The 11-M Madrid-Atocha atrocity is in this category although other issues handled badly by Spain like Ceuta-Melilla may play a role.  US stupidity has generalized a simple 9/11 attack to a real clash, including with Australian sex, also pedophile, tourism in Bali.

[3]  Spain is now making history, defying the US Empire by withdrawing troops (1,300), with Honduras (1,200).  Thailand, Portugal, Ukraine and Kazakhstan will not replace troops. South Korea, Poland, El Salvador, Bulgaria and Singapore have doubts. A coalition bought by spoils and fed with lies is unravelling, and more quickly so the more obvious the imminent defeat.  They will negotiate withdrawal against promise not to attack.

[4]  To correct a grave mistake, like joining the US Empire fight for oil control, geo-political goals of the Mackinder type (Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Eurasia. then the world) , and missionary activity, under pretexts like links to Al Qaeda and WMD (watch for US plants though), against 92% of Spain, in the name of Democracy, is not giving in to terrorism, nor a sign of being weak.  The weak person is incapable of rectifying mistakes and gives in to pressure.  The strong person changes his course.

[5]  USA and Israel live in a virtual reality, pretending they are only up against some special groups in Iraq and Palestine. Look at the map, look at history.  There has been in-fighting among Arabs and Muslims, but almost all borders between the 22 Arab and the 56 Muslim countries are established by Christian and one Jewish colonizer. US/Israel state terrorism reinforces the old idea of one Arab nation of more than 300 million, and one Islamic nation of more than 1,300 million from Casablanca to Mindanao.  The divisions in Islam are in time rather than space, between khalifats, dynasties.  The Crusades, with the Mongols, killed the Abassid dynasty in the Baghdad 1258 massacre. The khalifat movement is now growing again thanks to Bush & Co.

[6]  The present Crusade, with missionaries and bibles, even unifies Sunnis and Shia, Arab and non-Arab Muslims.  But Western unitary nation-states overestimate the cohesion inside countries like Iraq and Afghanistan, and underestimates the cohesion with other Arab/Islamic countries.  For both federations along Swiss, not US lines, with linguistic/religious borders, are meaningful; so are confederations with Arab and Muslim neighbor countries. What Christians do in the EU Arabs/Muslims might also like to do [7]  Iraqis and Palestinians with other Arabs and Muslims fight Anglo-American geo-fascism alone on behalf of the many dozens of countries intervened militarily by the US Empire.  With the US Empire causing that much killing and exploitation all over the world they are fighting on behalf of all of us, with major rise in the conversion to Islam in Africa and Asia, Europe and USA.

[8]  The peace movement, mainly in Christian countries, is long on critique, numbers, ritualistic marches and demos that impress no geo-fascist, and short on constructive alternatives and real struggle against the US Empire.  Hopefully civil society boycott of US consumer products (like colas, burgers and gasoline), capital goods (like Boeing aircraft for travel when there are alternatives; Boeing being a major death factory) and financial goods (dollars, stocks, bonds) is on the way. The average profit of a US company abroad is about 6% so not much boycott is needed.  Always to be combined with dialogue. We are fighting two fundamentalisms like we once fought two superpowers.

[9]  Many cling to the hope that US atrocities depends on Bush. But interventions, killing and exploitation is bipartisan, slightly higher under the Democrats as Republicans have been more “isolationist”.  The participation of John F. Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate, in “rebuking” Spain shows both lack of judgment and sharing of the imperial pursuit when he could have built a bridge to the nucleus of Europe. Of course this is Bush’ Vietnam as Edward Kennedy has pointed out.  But it would have been even better if he had voted against the war and  not left that essentially to the wonderful icon Barbara Lee.

[10]  Condi Rice complained that the intelligence contained no when, where and how of a 9/11 attack.  Ask what the USA has done in 240 interventions, and the  ask why. There is more to come.

[11]  The US project in Iraq is still-born in spite of a US deployment of 110,000 public and 18,000 privatized soldiers (“security civilians”) and the UK 8,700 UK; none of the others are reliable as defeat looms more clearly on the horizon.  Of course there may be lulls in the violence.  There is no Iraq to receive sovereignty, only a puppet regime, and what cannot be handed over because it can only come from the struggle of the Iraqis themselves will not be handed over anyhow, with the USA keeping an “embassy” with 5,000 employees in the “Green Zone”, 14 bases, and no plan to withdraw.  The war will continue.  30 June/1 July may become quite something.  These people fought centuries against the Ottomans and 40 years against UK regime.

[12]  The Israeli project in Palestine is also still-born. State terrorism, even targeted on religious leaders by the Israeli militarocracy, is a formula for collective Israeli suicide.

[13]  The TRANSCEND list of alternatives includes:

–  Conference for Security and Cooperation in the Middle East, CSCME

–  Iraq possibly as a federation, with a capital outside Baghdad

–  UN-led reconstruction/development

–  UN-led peacekeeping; all coalition troops out

–  A major role for the Organization of the Islamic Conference, OIC

–  Confederated Kurdish autonomies in Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Syria

–  A 6-country Middle East Community, MEC: Syria, Lebanon, Palestine     (242 and 338), Israel, Jordan and Egypt, with the EC as a model.

Related Posts

LONDON – So far so good, at least on the wider level. While internally Iraq seems on the edge of chaos, the much heralded clash of civilizations between the Muslim and Judaeo-Christian worlds has yet to become apparent. We have anger and despair aplenty in the Arab and Muslim worlds. But very little rushing to the standard and there was no great pilgrimage of warriors to join the fight, as happened when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan twenty years ago, and then, having driven the Red Army out, were left to ferment in that mountainous redoubt. With the armaments supplied by the CIA the mujahidin were transformed into Al Qaeda that became, for a relatively brief moment as these things go, ‘the greatest threat to the homeland that America has ever known.’ Nevertheless a ‘Cold War’ between much of the Muslim world and the West is certainly in full swing. Winston...
The Challenge of Nuclear Weaponsin the Twenty-first CenturyA Path Forward The peoples and governments of the world face an urgent challenge relating to weaponry of mass destruction and particularly to nuclear weaponry.  At the crossroads of technology, terrorism, geopolitical ambition, and policies of preemption are new and potent dangers for humanity. Despite ending the nuclear standoff of the Cold War era, nuclear weaponry is again menacing the peoples of the world with catastrophic possibilities.  We recognize the need for any government to pursue its security interests in accordance with international law; and further, we recognize that distinctive threats to these interests now exist as a result of an active international terrorist network having declared war on the United States and its allies. Nonetheless, we reject the assessment of the current US administration that upgrading a reliance on nuclear weapons is in any sense justified as a response. We find it...
By Karin Wegestal MP, the Social Democratic Partyon behalf of the Swedish Committee for Solidarity with the Yugoslav People During the last decade, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has received more than 500,000 refugees from Croatia and Bosnia, and another 300,000 internally displaced persons, mainly from the province Kosovo and Metohia. For a country with about ten million inhabitants, such an influx of homeless people is obviously a very heavy burden – even under peaceful conditions. But in addition to that, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been the subject to sanctions from the western powers for close to ten years and its infrastructure was badly hurt through Nato’s intense bombardment during 78 days in 1999. The result of all this is that Yugoslavia, once the most developed industrial country in Eastern Europe, is today the poorest country in Europe. In Serbia excluding Kosovo, with about ten million inhabitants and...

Recent Articles

Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...

TFF on Substack

Discover and subscribe to more peace materials on TFF Substack

Most Popular

Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
Read More
JoGSS-Silent
Jan Oberg TFF director October 28, 2026 Exactly one month has now passed since I published my criticism of the introduction to the special issue on Johan Galtung published by the Journal of Global Security Studies, JoGSS, and of Tor Egil Førland’s chapter about Galtung which serves as a preview to his forthcoming biography of Galtung to be published by PRIO. See the original on The Transnational here and the same article on TFF Substack with many general and critical comments and, in particular, the people who decided to withdraw from the biography project in protest. The special issue itself was extraordinary. It was devoted to the intellectual legacy of one of the founders of peace research and contained a number of strong assessments of his personality, scholarship, intellectual trajectory, and public role. Such assessments are, of course, entirely legitimate. No scholar is beyond criticism, and neither was Johan Galtung....
Screenshot 2026-10-26 115647
An aspect of Iran’s culture and civilisation you’ve probably never heard about. Don’t be surprised if the US and Israel also try to bomb them. Jan ObergTFF director October 26, 2026 Today – under the “USraeli” threat of new “annihilating” bombings – opens the 7th International Conference on Peace and Conflict Resolution at Tehran’s University. As far as I can tell, this is the only permanent, advanced peace research institution in West Asia/the Middle East. Perhaps more countries in that region could be inspired? I mean, how many military “security” institutes and military academies do they have? Many peace research institutes and university departments have been established since the 1950s in the West. They are now all under attack; some have closed down, some have gone mainstream, yet others kept the name but do nothing to research peace and disseminate results or advice; instead, they cooperate with militarism’s platforms such...
Screenshot 2026-10-15 141837
Let’s discuss using AI to create peace – in contrast to boring geopolitics devoid of creative healing and visions. Jan Oberg TFF director October 15, 2026 I asked VEED to create a short video exemplifying how peace is preferable to war, then chose the lady as a template. Simple as that. In less than a minute, it produced this video, which any peace-loving person would appreciate. The only problem is that human intelligence (HI), at least the one that exists among Western decision-makers, isn’t half as moral or smart as AI. I have used AI to dialogue about peace and peace plans, creative conflict resolution and visions of a better future for humankind. It so happens that I am having more stimulating, intelligent, creative and moral discussions with AI than I could possibly have with any EU or NATO leader today. Yes, AI has very problematic and dangerous aspects; used...
girl-5894831_1280
Below are TFF-related media mentions, comments, videos and social media posts published elsewhere but not on this homepage. We happen to catch and list only a fraction. Regarding video comments and debates, we recommend that you go to the TFF Video Channel on Substack where many of them are reproduced. Jan Oberg is a contributor to China Daily – 52 million daily clicks – and Global Times, CGTN and CCTV (the national television), China Investment, Xinhua News Agency and several others. Articles and videos on these media very often multiply into countless Chinese (and Western media) that re-post them from these main media. Thanks to The China Academy, his analyses, interviews and comments are frequently posted on YouTube channels such as Thinkers Forum and Wave Media. These videos are often re-posted on Bilibili (China’s YouTube), the China Content Center on TikTok, and on the Chinese edition of TikTok, Douyin.com. This means reaching hundreds of millions of viewers worldwide over a year. While there are too many to catch on all these...
Nobel-Prize-Plaque
Jan Oberg TFF director October 13, 2026 According to Alfred Nobel’s will, the Nobel Peace Prize shall be awarded: ”to the person who has done the most or best to advance fellowship among nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and the establishment and promotion of peace congresses.” Further down, he also expresses how the prize for the “champions of peace” shall be decided: “that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be selected by the Norwegian Storting. Alfred Nobel’s will is remarkably short and clear. But few seem to have read it. Nobel did not say that the committee itself should consist of members of parliament. He entrusted the Storting with appointing five persons. In principle, it could have selected diplomats, mediators, peace researchers, conflict-resolution specialists, or other individuals with recognised expertise in matters of peace from around the world. Instead, the Storting gradually...
law-419057_1280
The Quest for Humane Survival Richard Falk Professor emeritus, Princeton UniversityTFF Associate since 1986October 12, 2026 After decades of teaching and writing about international law in academic frameworks that were not institutionally situated within law school environments—at Princeton and the University of California, Santa Barbara—I found myself most receptive to the TWAIL outlook. It has been especially illuminating in clarifying the extent to which international law evolved as a dialogical critique of Europe’s efforts to legitimize its colonial undertakings. In particular, TWAIL has exposed how international law has functioned to legalize the subjugation of Third World peoples, securing conditions for exploitative investment and trade relations, the coercive enforcement of public debts, and an ideology of cultural superiority. TWAIL’s exposure of these economic legacies of colonialism has influenced my understanding of the history and development of international law, broadly conceived, as an ideological project of the Western sub-system of the world...