The U.S. Cold War Against China Is Self-Destructive

The U.S. Cold War Against China Is Self-Destructive

Jan Oberg

Originally published by Global Times, Beijing, on September 5, 2023

September 28, 2023

A couple of years ago, The Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research, TFF, in Sweden, of which I am the director, published ”Behind The Smokescreen. An Analysis of the West’s Destructive China Cold War Agenda And Why It Must Stop” (130 pages).

Among several perspectives of the U.S./Western accusation industry, we looked into the medialised stories about genocide in Xinjiang, forced labour, and Taiwan and nine mainstream media manipulation methods that aim to manufacture a systematically negative image of China in the Western mind.

We found that the Cold War happens by attempts to influence the ’free’ press – also the Western state press – through three main mechanisms: a) Fake or fabricated stories, b) Omission – for instance, of every positive aspect of China’s developments, and c) Source Ignorance: using the same few disinformative sources from the U.S. rippling through and being repeated ad nauseam and never checking the root empirical evidence or validity of the assertions. In short, FOSI.

Ultimately, this causes a decay of the crucial, critical role of mainstream media and their conversion towards tabloid banalising black-and-white worldviews – ”we good, them evil” – that promote confrontation and warfare operated by the Military-Industrial-Media-Academic Complex, MIMAC.

Tragically for democracy, mainstream media have become a leading promoting militarism, armament, and legitimising the Empire and its wars.

What are the elements of the Cold War in all this?

First and foremost, the Cold War is a psycho-political phenomenon. It dichotomises our incredibly complex world into two: good versus evil. It seeks to preserve ’our’ superiority and keep others submissive and weaker. It promises war if its deterrence fails. And it precludes a world of equals, cooperation and mutual learning. If you are Number 1 in a system, you do not learn and listen; you teach, bribe and issue orders.

Cold Wars may go well for the Cold Warrior when in ascendance. In the ”old” Cold War in Europe, two fundamentally Western systems – one based on Karl Marx, the other on Adam Smith, to put it crudely – competed while the US/NATO ascended after 1945. On all power scales, it was superior to the Soviet Union and its system. We know the end.

The winner then – foolishly – took it all: The US/NATO world did what it pleased within its exceptionalist ’international rules-based order,’ not the UN Charter and other parts of international law. Catchwords: out-of-NATO-area military actions in violation of NATO’s own Treaty – Yugoslavia – and regime change/resource/anti-terrorism wars on an assembly line basis; NATO’s expansion against all promises given to the Soviet Union – a reckless hubris-like taking advantage of Russia’s de facto lying down.

It all went so well and seemed so easy. Why listen to or empathise with others? Why focus on the changing world when ’we’ are the change-makers, God’s own country par excellence? If we can get away with it, we do it. However, prudence, statesmanship and long-range thinking would have compelled global impact analyses instead of narcissist imperial self-aggrandisement.

So well did it go that the West overlooked the Rest: China’s impressive socio-economic development based on an eclectic combination of Chinese concepts – that the West still don’t understand – and imported Western elements; the establishment and maturation of organisations like BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, and African and other regional organisations.

The West also did not sense the actual prices of its militarism: It’s huge and growing burden on all civilian sectors, including technology and economy and – in the wake of the history of colonialism and imperialism – the Rest becoming more and more nationally and collectively self-reliant – a concept developed about 50 years ago and ridiculed by the West.

And the result? Well, this article is written the day after BRICS expanded with essential countries in Africa, the Middle East and South America – a huge step towards a multipolar and cooperative Rest saying: We can do without you, America and Europe! If you want to cooperate on new, reasonable terms, we are ready, but the days of your Western hegemony and universalisation of Western values are numbered.

Such is global macro history: Empires have come and gone, and that of the US/NATO is the last: Nobody is so naive as to believe that it has a God-given right to be the ruler of the whole world and force others to accept its values.

The enormous world order changes before our eyes were as predictable as inexorable. Only the ignorance – blinding intoxication – of power overlooks it. The West has run its race and become over-extended, insensitive to other cultures and ways of thinking, and unable to adapt to system changes but insists on steering unilaterally. It’s losing legitimacy in the eyes of others, relative economic and political strength and the creative ability to outline a better future world that the Rest feels attracted to: Classical decline indicators!

What I have said here is pure Gandhian thinking: You may harm others by using violence – physical, economic, military, structural, cultural and environmental violence – but, sooner rather than later, your violence boomerangs: corrupts, debases, brutalises and makes you more loathed than loved.

A critical mass will develop.

In a deeper socio-cultural sense, the Christian Occident has never appropriately problematised those many types of violence upon which it built its relations with The Rest.

The West’s Cold War on China is about so much more than the issues that dominate daily news – chips, trade, Taiwan and the topics of the permanent accusation industry.

It’s about profound tectonic changes in humanity’s way of developing – and about whether or not the West will join and contribute or become a de-developed periphery in the new world. And whether its Empire will go down with a whimper or a bang or adapt to macro history’s unavoidable changes.

We know very little about humanity’s future in the next 100 or so years. The safest philosophy will be for The Rest to, despite all, extend compassion and cooperation to the good forces of The West and abstain from tit-for-tat against its evil ones.

It is easy, fast and safe. Go here. Many thanks!

2 Responses to "The U.S. Cold War Against China Is Self-Destructive"

  1. Richard Eng   September 28, 2023 at 11:56 am

    American excellence and world rule have caused enormous death and destruction over the decades. No other country comes close to America’s level of devastation and human misery created, for example, in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine and Vietnam. This is immorality of the highest order.

    Has China done anything like this, especially since its opening up in the 1980s? China has fought no wars during this period, making it the most peaceful world power that has ever existed.

    American excellence and world rule have also suppressed the development of poorer nations and exploited them for their natural resources. Endless sanctions have caused untold human suffering. This is immorality of the highest order.

    China, on the other hand, has helped these countries through the Belt and Road Initiative. China has given these countries a voice in BRICS and SCO.

    We have a choice: US imperialism or Chinese prosperity. US violence or Chinese peace. We must do away with Western immorality.

    • JO   September 28, 2023 at 5:30 pm

      Many thanks, dear Richard Eng. You’re right, there is destruction of others – and I add the consequence over time: destruction of one self, moral decay and need for a reality check.


To promote dialogue, write your appreciation, disagreement, questions or add stuff/references that will help others learn more...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.